User talk:Neelix/Archive 7

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Speedy deletion declined: The Verifier

Hello Neelix, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of The Verifier - a page you tagged - because: I don't think that's particularly spammy. Could do with a rewrite though. . Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Ged UK 19:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Spirit of America

I was trying to find photos of all 12 of the "Spirit of America" statues appearing in the American Adventure pavilion in Epcot. You have uploaded 11 of the 12 (Spirit of Adventure, Education, etc) but did not upload the Spirit of Freedom statue photo. If you have a photo of it, I would be greatly appreciative if you could post one on Wikipedia. Thank you. Don Hanson (hansond@shaw.ca) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.167.82 (talk) 03:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Deletion tags

I can't imagine anyone typing in a parenthetical name to search for the word "pied," so have put deletion tags on. Nothing personal, please don't be offended. We shall see what the wikigods say. Montanabw^(talk) 21:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pied (pattern)

The article Pied (pattern) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unneeded redirect to disambiguation page that already exists

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw^(talk) 21:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pied (act)

The article Pied (act) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unneeded redirect to disambiguation page that already exists

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw^(talk) 21:36, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Pied (pattern)

I have nominated Pied (pattern), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pied (pattern). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Montanabw^(talk) 05:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Pied (act)

I have nominated Pied (act), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pied (act). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Montanabw^(talk) 05:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Divine Similitude

What was inappropriate about the hatnote on UU-ism?

It seemed perfectly reasonable to me. What was your reason for deleting it? Thanks. Academic38 (talk) 17:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Blackworld Entertainment

Hello Neelix, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Blackworld Entertainment - a page you tagged - because: Not unambiguously promotional. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:47, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Insensible

Can I suggest unconsciousness as a better redirect for insensible and related terms. DJ Clayworth (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Carabane

Hello Neelix,

Yes I had noticed it a few weeks ago. Great job indeed, looks better than the original ! At the moment I can't remember where these assertions came from (probably some of the flaws...), but I'm going to have a look at it within a couple of days. A bientôt donc, Ji-Elle (talk) 16:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Carabane (suite)

Re-bonjour Neelix, je vais répondre ici petit à petit (pas si facile...) :

1) pénurie d'argile : Louis-Vincent Thomas, Les Diola : essai d'analyse fonctionnelle sur une population de Basse-Casamance, IFAN, Dakar, 1958, p. 121

5) après la dissolution de l'éphémère Fédération du Mali, la Casamance voit arriver des fonctionnaires venus du nord, souvent wolofs et musulmans, mais surtout ne connaissant pas le pays diola et ses traditions. Les périodes de sécheresse qui frappent le Sahel à partir des années 1970 poussent aussi des cultivateurs d'arachide à s'installer dans une région où le riz régnait sans partage : numérous sources, e.g. Oumar Diatta, La Casamance : essai sur le destin tumultueux d'une région, L'Harmattan, Paris, 2008, p. 160-161

6) pirogue-ambulance : no real source I am afraid, except the picture itself taken while talking to people, and this [1]

7) kayendo : source already mentioned elsewhere : Constant Vanden Berghen et Adrien Manga, « Les outils », dans Une introduction à un voyage en Casamance, L'Harmattan, Paris, 1999, p. 55-56

A suivre... Ji-Elle (talk) 08:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Image rename request

Hi Neelix, Just a little heads-up on of your images: Oniscid is Roach Thanks for PDing - I will be using it as an example of onisciform non-Oniscids :o). Cheers, Pudding4brains —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.75.10.66 (talk) 09:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Carabane (again)

Hi,

Je me suis absentée deux jours, mais me revoilà.

3) "des observations qui restent précieuses aujourd'hui" : la formulation était peut-être maladroite. En fait je voulais dire qu'à ma connaissance il n'y a pas eu depuis d'étude aussi systématique. En tout cas cette description servira de référence lorsqu'un nouveau travail de terrain sera effectué.

4) l'expression "une carte postale de rêve" et la phrase "sa plage de sable blanc bordée de cocotiers assurent désormais sa renommée" viennent de la revue Teranga ("Les secrets de Karabane", p. 23-24) déjà citée ailleurs dans l'article. Pour le commerce des noix de coco, je n'ai retrouvé que ceci : [2].

Le mieux est en effet de supprimer ce qui pose problème, ça ne me semble pas fondamental.

En revanche une mise à jour de l'article serait sans doute nécessaire de mon côté aussi, notamment pour les problèmes de transport et d'accès, je verrai ça un de ces jours.

Good luck anyway,

Ji-Elle (talk) 16:29, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Telecommunications in Thailand

Thanks for your contributions to this article. Telecommunications one of the fastest developing fields of technology in the world. A special effort is therefore required to keep articles like these up to date as the statistics reported here can change dramatically in as little as a few months. If you can, please take a moment to check the page for accuracy and make any necessary updates.--Kudpung (talk) 06:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Hustler (disambiguation)

You seemed to have a pretty strong desire to organize that page in a specific way. You'll probably want to re-do it, since it has recently had a bunch of stuff added to it in one blob at the top. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 12:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

MOSDAB

You are likely to be interested in this topic. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 22:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Spread heads

The article Spread heads has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I understand Spearhead Snake but Spear Head can be about anything. Not just snakes!

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Coldplay Expert (talk • contribs)

RfD nomination of Ohr'-fee-uhs

RfD nomination of Ohr'-fews

RfD nomination of Sabi'oon

RfD nomination of Sabi'een

RfD nomination of Sabi een

RfD nomination of Sabi oon

RfD nomination of Sabieen

RfD nomination of Sabioon

Carabane (again again)

Actually I very much like the article, and I will be striking my oppose.

My rather poor French isn't good enough to judge whether all of the sources support what the article is saying, but from what I've looked at I can see no red flags. If Karanacs comes back and says she's happy, then I'll more than likely switch to support. --Malleus Fatuorum 23:42, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Avram (disambiguation) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Avram (disambiguation). Since you had some involvement with the Avram (disambiguation) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MegaSloth (talk) 01:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for removing the duplicate article.

I don't know if you saw my comments on the deletion discussion before you made the change. If not, please can you address the following additional issues to complete the page move:

Content has been cut-and-pasted from Avram (name) to Avram (given name) andAvram (surname) without proper attribution; please see instructions at Help:Split#Procedure for the correct way to split pages.
Content from the lead sentence of Avram (name) is missing from Avram (given name) and/or Avram (surname), for no readily apparent reason.

Many thanks, --MegaSloth (talk) 22:10, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Neelix. You have new messages at MegaSloth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Articles for deletion nomination of O. cornutus

I have nominated O. cornutus, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O. cornutus. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pcap ping 23:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Carabane note

I just wanted to say that I appreciate your good nature and disposition throughout a difficult FAC! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

And I'd just like to congratulate you on forging your way successfully through a rather difficult FAC. --Malleus Fatuorum 01:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

My apologies for not getting back to the FAC more quickly. You did a superb job, Neelix - congratulations to both you and Ji-elle! Karanacs (talk) 15:39, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Carabane ?

Hi Neelix ! As I had told you, I left for about 10 days and couldn't see the various messages. I am now back from the Mauritanian Adrar and I wonder what happened here in the meantime. Is everything OK ? Ji-Elle (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Neelix! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Hoss (musician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nancy McArthur - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Facetiously listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Facetiously. Since you had some involvement with the Facetiously redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Powers ^T 11:56, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Carabane, etc.

Bonjour Neelix,

Je me réjouis d'apprendre que vous avez atteint votre objectif, avec autant de détermination que de sérénité ! Je me réjouis aussi de savoir que Carabane a désormais un article dans deux langues, et donc de meilleures chances de se faire connaître, même si ce n'était pas le but à l'origine.

Au plaisir d'une prochaine collaboration, un jour, peut-être...

Bien cordialement, Ji-Elle (talk) 20:30, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Merci. Ji-Elle (talk) 06:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Congrats

Nice work translating Carabane; I read it today when it was on Wikipedia's main page. Regards, —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 22:24, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Excellent. I have a request. Can you improve the main Senegal article? It should be three times as long at least and 300 times the quality! ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 13:57, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

OK. As an article on the whole country it is shockingly bad. The goal eventually is to have an articles on an African towns or village or island looking like Carabane!! Well done! ‡ Himalayan ‡^ΨMonastery 16:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Breaking Down (Sugar Samba)

I made an article on the band. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed new map style for List of Diplomatic missions by Country articles

As a regular contributor to these articles your views are sought about a new map style for the List of Diplomatic missions by Country articles.

Currently we are using maps which show which countries host a diplomatic mission of a given country (please see as an example the map we use for List of diplomatic missions of Spain). These maps however do not show where the missions are actually located (which may be a few for those countries with large networks of consulates). And the title of this ("Diplomatic missions of Spain") and other similar maps could be more accurate

The map style I propose instead indicates the cities that host a mission of a given country. As an example, I have produced this map for List of diplomatic missions of Singapore.

It is not difficult to make these maps. They are based on the third map below (accessible at [File:Blank map cities shaded.PNG] on Wikipedia Commons), in which I have indicated all the world capitals and other major cities where diplomatic missions are located. The circles representing cities are not visible because they are slightly different shade of grey, but all you have to do is colour each circle with a distinctive colour, and in no time you can have a more accurate and easier to read map.

I think that this approach is more appropriate for this and other categories of articles which concern cities (such as List of national capitals, Lufthansa destinations, List of cities that failed in their bids to host the Olympics etc.), rather than countries.

Please add your views to this new proposal, including whether you like it, see problems, or see ways how it could be improved here

Thanks! Kransky (talk) 10:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Campbell.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Campbell.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Resident Evil creatures

Hi. It seems that you forgot to include the source articles in the edit summary when you merged the creatures to the main list. I assume that the content came from List of creatures in Resident Evil 4 and List of creatures in the Resident Evil series. Would you mind attributing it with a Help:Dummy edit? Alternately, I can do it if you confirm the sources. Thanks. Flatscan (talk) 05:04, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Are you making a minor change (dummy edit) or no change (null edit)? I usually switch the number of spaces 1↔2 following a period. I suggest editing the section List of Resident Evil characters#Creatures to get the automatic edit summary and to make the diff highlight text related to the actual copy. Flatscan (talk) 05:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Glad that I could help. Happy editing to you as well. Flatscan (talk) 05:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Removing self-links in List of Resident Evil characters

If these were pure self-links, I'd agree with removing them, but why remove links to specific sections within the same (long) article? It's actually helpful to be able to jump without returning to the ToC. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 17:16, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Looking at your full diff, the second change (removing the Queen Leech link) looks to be a legit section link. I don't know what would or would not be helpful (my experience with Resident Evil is limited to the first 15 minutes of RE4), so I don't know the relative importance of these characters and what would make them link worthy. That's just an example; it seems like there are at least a few others like that. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 17:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello, possibly Frennch Speaeking Member

I've been User-surfing and noticed that you are Quebec-Canadian. (Sounds a bit like stalking. :p) Anywho, I mentioned French-Speaking because a couple of months ago, I stumbled across a "making of" video of the first Mortal Kombat film. It was compiled by Christopher Lambert who is a French-Speaking actor who portrayed Raiden (Mortal Kombat) in the film. I was wondering if you could extract any useful information from it to add more to the article. The link is here: http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x52xat_making-of-mortal-kombat_shortfilms It is of course at your discretion but would be a great addition to it. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Government Issue

Regarding this, the potential confusion is with G.I. (military), which is an initialism for "Government Issue". What would you recommend as a better hatnote dab for readers that might be searching for the military term rather than the band? --IllaZilla (talk) 22:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Zilla,

Hatnotes should only disambiguate with articles which could be referred to by the article's title or the title of a redirect to the article in question. If G.I. (military) is the only other article which could be referred to as "Government Issue", I would recommend a hatnote such as the following:

Happy editing,

Neelix (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Neelix. You have new messages at Brambleclawx's talk page.
Message added 20:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Awaiting Brambleclawx's response. Airplaneman ^talk 20:04, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Neelix. You have new messages at Brambleclawx's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:Torbay.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Torbay.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Carbonear city seal.

Hi, I noticed that someone uploaded another image over an image of you. See File:Carbonear.JPG. Normally, i would have split these two in separate uploads, but both are Fair use files, so I'm coming to you first before I do that (because that would mean deletion of your file). —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 22:54, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Halloween

First, show me where it says, "The standard method of linking to character lists when some individual characters have their own articles is to link the word "Characters" in the section title." I've never seen such a thing in WP:MOSFILMS or WP:MOSTV. Unless there's an WP:MOSNAVBOX, then I'm sure there's nothing that says they must be linked there. Especially when it looks more like you're linking the term "Characters" and not providing a link to a "List of characters" from the film franchise. As for the line break...I really don't care of it's there or not. It was originally put them to keep symmetry, yes, but I was made aware a month or so ago that it was appearing on certain screens as 4 broken lines, instead of just two. I never changed the Halloween template to reflect it, and I didn't realize that you had removed it when I put the link to the character page back where it was before. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 04:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fortuneseal.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fortuneseal.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 14 March 2010 (UTC)