User talk:Nemoralis/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, NMW03, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! McSly (talk) 14:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

WP:MODERNPLACENAME

Welcome to en.wp. Per WP:MODERNPLACENAME we welcome modern place names - which means as found in reliable English sources since 2015 in most cases, in the case of major cities, since 2020. The Turkish font, Azerbaijan font are welcome on en.wp and used for all geo articles except where there is a proven exception list of English exonyms. Happy editing. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. But that discussion is for anglicizing name. Not new name. --NMW03 (talk) 15:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Salam Azərbaycan023 (talk) 05:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

AZAD Systems moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, AZAD Systems, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 07:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @HitroMilanese:. Can you review again? --NMW03 (talk) 10:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:AZAD Systems has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:AZAD Systems. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:50, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AZAD Systems (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject. Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, NMW03! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:39, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Control copyright icon Hello NMW03! Your additions to Draft:AZAD Systems have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🇨🇦 (talk) 13:40, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: AZAD Systems (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No significant coverage, but it can be still redirect to Aeronautics Defense Systems.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Operation Goranboy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artsakh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Misak Torlakian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tabriz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:13, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

AA2 advisory

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
  • Changed "Azerbaijani" into "South Azerbaijani" on the Tabriz article (thereby inferring some sort of WP:CON that has never existed, nor any sort of discussion). No edit summary either.[1]
  • Reinstated the same edit (i.e. revert #1)[2]
  • Reinstated the same edit (i.e. revert #2), accompanied by a WP:BATTLE-loaded edit summary ("you don't decide that; WP:JDL (...)")[3]

You need a consensus before making such changes to long-standing content. Edit warring content into articles won't work on Wikipedia. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:14, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Dear @LouisAragon: I'm not "POV-pushing". I thought {{Lang-az}} don't work with arabic scripts (RTL thing). I just saw that it has |script=Arab parameter which does RTL. Anyways, I hope we come to a consensus. But I want to get your opinion on something. Why do you think {{Lang-azb}} exists? NMW03 (talk) 22:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

1RR

Hello NMW03, you recently broke the WP:1RR on the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War article which you can find first thing on talk, the same 1RR that when placed in an article, also appears when one is undoing something, so you should've been aware of it yet you broke it. Not only that but you also made an edit reverting the information that was discussed extensively in the talk, and you didn't even discuss the change you wanted to enforce before making the edit. Please self-revert, if you wish to make a change, discuss in talk beforehand. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 21:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

@KhndzorUtogh next time, please add discussion's link in edit summary. I see three users disagreeing with you in that discussion. You didn't reply to the last comment for 4 days, only coming back to reply a day after the main user disagreeing with you was topic banned. That's not a very good look. I am going to ping the participators in the discussion to resume the discussion who aren't topic banned. NMW03 (talk) 16:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
I hope you appreciate that instead of reporting you for breaching 1RR I came to your talk out of good faith. Now, when you're undoing your reverts after having breached 1RR and having not commented on talk, please be so kind to self-revert not just one but all of your edits, including this; the rationale for this was already explained on talk a long time ago. Furthermore, it's baffling to me that with all this discussion investigating, you didn't notice that my reply was literally directed to a completely different user who isn’t blocked and could’ve commented any time. You can see that in a separate comment I did announce the changes I made on the article talk, nobody commented on it or opposed it (even though anyone else who was not blocked, could comment) hence your remark “not a very good look” is undue. Please undo all of your reverts and try achieving consensus on talk. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 20:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
You're the one who made changes to the article without consensus, and those changes were reverted. Per WP:BRD, the idea is for us to discuss and find consensus on any modifications before adding them. One month isn't "a long time ago". I'm not going to revert my other edit per WP:BRD. Can we continue this discussion on the talk page of that article? NMW03 (talk) 20:37, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
Something that isn't challenged for that long from any editor in that discussion is consensus per WP:SILENCE, hence I implemented the changes you now want to contest. You are the one who wants to introduce a change (which, as you can see, I’m challenging), hence it's on you to try to reach consensus, I therefore reverted your edit. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 21:46, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit. Thanks you. 2402:800:6344:2A73:8DE5:C07C:DACA:63E6 (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi. I'm not native speaker. You can ask in WP:GOCER NMW03 (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. R.Lemkin (talk) 13:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nemoralis/Archive_1&oldid=1176920170"