User talk:Neo-Brasidas
Welcome!
[edit]
|
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Neo-Brasidas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The rules say I can file an unblock request and so I'm submitting one on five grounds: 1. the block is the result of an underhanded strategy executed by Ashmedai 119 meant to terminate new "threats" instead of proactively opening channels for discussion (proven by Ashmedai 119 correlating me with the "Deucalionite" account twice and never personally approaching me to collaborate), 2. a false positive from a duck test is still false, 3. never was I notified of any witch-hunt proceedings and was never given a chance to even defend myself against the laughably wrong straw-man accusations filed against me by Ashmedai 119 who has continuously suppressed my good faith edits with Jingiby, 4. causation and correlation are not the same: correcting parts of a controversial page doesn't make me controversial and asking for help as a last resort from someone who welcomed you doesn't suffice to eternally banish anyone from anywhere, 5. my contributions were all done with the best of intentions and I've actually improved some neglected sectors of this encyclopedia. In closing, Ashmedai 119's false profile of me, operating on racist assumptions, can be countered point for point and if given the chance, I can demonstrate to the community what is ultimately a terrible misunderstanding. Neo-Brasidas (talk) 00:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Firstly, having checked the relevant editing histories fairly thoroughly, I have seen evidence which encourages the belief that this account is a block-evading sockpuppet. Fortunately, not all of the evidence was described in the sockpuppet investigation. Secondly, whether this account is a sockpuppet or not, it has been responsible for persistent tendentious editing, refusing to acknowledge consensus or to edit collaboratively, and unblocking the account would not benefit the project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:33, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.