User talk:Nerilanik
Welcome
[edit]
|
The article RevealMe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Promotional article, no evidence of notability. RS sourcing is a single article in PinkNews, and that's a passing mention based on a survey done for a press release. The only other media coverage was Daily Mail and The Sun. WP:BEFORE shows two stories based on the same press release. This is, at absolute best, a WP:TOOSOON.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Orphaned non-free image File:Eliminalia small.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Eliminalia small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Sarthak Sharma for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarthak Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Sarthak Sharma for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarthak Sharma (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Laptopinmyhands (talk) 03:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 10:54, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Appealing Block
[edit]
Nerilanik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello Blablubbs, recently my Wikipedia account was “Blocked as a sockpuppet”, which seems like a misunderstanding as I have no relation to the accounts listed as allegedly linked to mine. Nerilanik is the only Wikipedia account I own or have connection to, thus, any resemblance or connection that it appears to have with the said accounts is a matter of sheer coincidence. Additionally, I would like to bring into your kind notice that the edit history (contribution) of my account has been clear of vandalism or any other violation of Wikipedia policies. The edits are done purely based on major news stories such as the ones listed in the block and have never been aimed at defaming or commending any party involved or not. I request you to kindly revert the block from my account and grant me another chance to rectify what you see as a mistake on my end, as my intentions have only been to add information on Wikipedia without any bias.Nerilanik (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Every sock puppet denies being one, because that is the whole point. I don't know if you are a sock or meat puppet, but this isn't just a coincidence. I see no reason here to disbelieve what the SPI found. Maybe someone else will. 331dot (talk) 06:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.