User talk:Newsprod1

Glasgow University Guardian[edit]

Hi. Thank you for leaving me a message. Please see my response to your additions on the article's talk page. If you need any assistance let me know. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:13, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Newsprod1/How to start a revolution has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/How to start a revolution, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 18:44, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taking film article to "Did You Know" (linked from main page)[edit]

Thanks for creating the article on the film How to Start a Revolution. You may want to know about the possibility of highlighting the article on Wikipedia's main page, as a "Did You Know" item. See the DYK overview/instructions HERE. We'd need to think of a hook. The article might be OK as is right now (I cleaned it up a bit), but it might prevent delays if someone (you?) shifted some of those bare links in the reference section to be inline citations (ideally with proper titles/info facilitating recovery in case link is broken). The catch, though, is that DYK nominations must be made before an article is 5 days old. So something should be done soon. -- Presearch (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of How to Start a Revolution[edit]

Hello! Your submission of How to Start a Revolution at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Aridd (talk) 20:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed (material removed)[edit]

Dear Newsprod1: I will shortly be removing material from the article on How to Start a Revolution, that you started. I am removing the material because I couldn't find a source. I think you may know this topic better than I do. If you know of a source for any or all of this material, please restore whatever parts of the material you can, but in a properly sourced form. One sentence I am removing is: "film has received strong international interest being translated and screened on television channels in Spain, Norway, Belgium, Japan, Brazil and across the Middle East by Al Jazeera Arabic." --Presearch (talk) 23:26, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for How to Start a Revolution[edit]

On 15 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article How to Start a Revolution, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that How to Start a Revolution, a 2011 BAFTA award-winning film that profiled the "Machiavelli of Nonviolence", was described by the New York Times as a "noble documentary"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/How to Start a Revolution.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Carabinieri (talk) 08:04, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamila raqib[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jamila raqib requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamila raqib[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jamila raqib requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:06, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know it may seem odd that I both declined the speedy deletion and then nominated, but that's because I felt that you had done just barely enough paraphrasing to pass the concerns of the previous deletion request. Note that if the article is kept, it will need a massive overhaul, because it's still far far too close to the target URL. However, I don't expect it to be kept, since I don't see any evidence that this person is particularly important, and certainly not notable in a Wikipedia sense. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:08, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/How to start a revolution concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/How to start a revolution, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission How to start a revolution[edit]

Hello Newsprod1. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled How to start a revolution.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/How to start a revolution}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jamila Raqib has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jamila Raqib. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamila Raqib (March 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are all either directly connected to her (i.e. PRIMARY and thus discouraged) or do little more than mention or quote her. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamila Raqib and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:32, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jamila Raqib concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jamila Raqib, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:08, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Newsprod1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jamila Raqib concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jamila Raqib, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jamila Raqib[edit]

Hello, Newsprod1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jamila Raqib".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl | talk 18:56, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Newsprod1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]