Jump to content

User talk:Nicknikio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Nicknikio, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 11:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: NICKNIKIO (April 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 06:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nicknikio! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KJP1 (talk) 06:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm KingAndGod. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Exo (band), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KingAndGod 08:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Monster (Exo song). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. KingAndGod 08:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NICKNIKIO (April 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Stop icon

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia — and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - Nick Joong to sandbox[edit]

A cup of coffee for you!

Hey, there! I'm KingAndGod. I wanted to let you know that I've moved your article (Nick Joong) out of the article space. The article does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved the article to your sandbox where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and are ready to submit it for review, place {{subst:submit}} at the bottom of the article and click "Publish changes". To reduce the chances of deletion, it is best to let a reviewer accept the submission rather than move it yourself as other editors could tag it for deletion immediately. If you would like to experiment, please use the public sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. KingAndGod 17:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Joong for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Joong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Joong (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 18:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nick Joong for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Joong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Joong (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia /cheap shit room 19:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nick Joong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Quek157 (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nick Joong, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Quek157 (talk) 19:34, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that User:Nicknikio/sandbox, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:3164:A7CC:68AF:4311 (talk) 20:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Nick Joong.jpg, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 2A02:C7F:963F:BA00:3164:A7CC:68AF:4311 (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you do not cease your blatantly promotional and disruptive editing your next block will be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ad Orientem: Would you be against extending this into an indefinite block? Please see my closing rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Joong (2nd nomination). This user is not here to build an encyclopedia. xplicit 02:07, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Explicit  Done -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:11, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 02:08, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicknikio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

why did u block me i am practicing to create a wiki article can u please unblock me. i did nothing why Nicknikio 06:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC) 331dot (talk) 08:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Being a test or practice might explain one edit, but you attempted to spread your "practice" edit to other articles, which would cause people to think you are actually a member of a South Korean band. There are proper ways to make practice edits, what you did was not one. As I am not certain that you understand this, I am declining your request. You will need to indicate the correct way and place to make practice edits, and tell us what you would like to edit about, in order to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nicknikio (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #21563 was submitted on May 18, 2018 08:13:45. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 08:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock Nicknikio[edit]

User:Ad Orientem

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicknikio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

why did you block me i am practicing to create a wiki article in my sandbox why everyone is deleting my saved edit and telling creating Hoax. i did nothing i am just practicing i am just trying to improve my self from wiki edits please unblock me User:Ad Orientem

Decline reason:

See previous decline reason. Yunshui  09:55, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot[edit]

User:331dot Actually i am not a showing off to others that i am as south korean boy band. Nick joong is a south korean singer i am just trying that if it will work or not on the semi protected pages if i edit but it worked and i have entered nick joong's name in the article that was my mistake but i was just checking it. Nicknikio 08:35, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So you aren't from India as Explicit believes? 331dot (talk) 08:46, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No i am from India User:331dot and my apologies for making my test edits on other article i am sincerely being sorry i was just trying to make some use in the wikipedia and also user User:Explicit he always makes my edit deletes if you can please unblock me again i won't do an disruptive edits Nicknikio 08:53, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In your unblock request that I declined, I explained the things that you need to do that are most likely to get you unblocked, but it's not a guarantee, and your edits don't help. Another administrator will be reviewing your request. 331dot (talk) 08:58, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I live in South Korea, so I would really love to hear more about how Nick Joong is under SM Entertainment, how he's a member of Exo, and all these other claims you've made. For administrators, please see the deleted text of User:Nicknikio, where the subject states he's from India. xplicit 00:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


User:Explicit Nick joong is not a member of exo he is an artist under s.m entertainment i just wrote his name on exo band page that if i edit this will really work or not i am testing it if i create an article if it stays or get's deleted i am just checked it. After i created it you have seen it and deleted it for creating Hoax a fake article. Then i have realized it wikipedia will only accept the reliable sources.Nicknikio 03:52, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

UNBLOCK[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nicknikio (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

first of all i am SORRY to the mistakes i have made and i am willing to make only useful edits. Please unblock me i will never again make such cause or damage or disruptive edits to Wikipedia content and i won't create multiple accounts and i promise that and I am truly being sorry here Nicknikio 15:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

User engaged in block evasion as Songoku21 (talk · contribs) showing they are operating in bad faith. This user is heading toward a permanent WP:CBAN rather than an unblock. Yamla (talk) 11:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Id like to propose the following conditions for unblocking. 1) No more edits about Nick Joong under any variant or different spelling. No edits about anyone connected with SM Entertainment or Exo. 2) Please explain how you avoid making promotional edits. 3) Please give us your understanding of Wikipedia's policy on material copyrighted elsewhere. How must content be licensed to be used on Wikipedia? 4) Please explain in your own words what is meant by "all content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." 5) Detail what constructive edits would you make.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

user:Dlohcierekim i promise that i will do no more edits about Nick Joong and no more edits who are connected with SM Entertainment or Exo (band). I would like to make only useful edits only by respecting Wikipedia policy and copyrighted material and i would use only reliable source which are verifiable to users who will review my edits. Thank you Nicknikio 08:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

user:Dlohcierekim i am waiting for your response.Nicknikio 06:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You answered the first point above, but only provided a vague generality for the rest of them. Please specifically answer the other points. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks 331dot for doing the dirty work. SOmetimes I'm too inclined to not require complete answers.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And then there is this... User:Songoku21. [Returning to my vacation.] -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Should an SPI be filed for the record? » Z0 | talk 08:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's necessary as it's a check user block. But I don't see how an unblock request can be granted at the present time. I suggest the request be declined with the understanding that Nicknikio can request a standard offer in six months. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]