User talk:Nicky Haugh

July 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Total Drama (season 5), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summaries[edit]

Hi there. I saw you recently expanded the plot of Dawn of the Dead (2004 film). Unfortunately, Wikipedia film articles are supposed to be kept to a 700 word maximum in order to maintain readability. This means that we can't always include as much detail as we'd like. One way to get around this is to include a bit of descriptive detail in the cast section, such as in the Featured Article Prometheus (2012 film). However, this should probably be sourced content and avoid overwhelming the reader with overly detailed trivia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Back at it, I see. I removed your expansion work because of WP:FILMPLOT.

If you need a word count tool you can try one of several online ones, for instance this one. Please refrain from making the plot sections too large. Binksternet (talk) 23:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of storylines in Emmerdale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew King. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Furious 7, did not appear constructive and have been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:04, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Nicky Haugh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Transformers: Age of Extinction. Stop violating the WP:FILMPLOT guideline by adding too much text to plot sections. Binksternet (talk) 13:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 20:52, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Nicky Haugh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pat Phelan (Coronation Street), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. – JuneGloom07 Talk 17:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pat Phelan (Coronation Street), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sebastian Shaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Nicky Haugh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coronation Street timeline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Preston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert Sugden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Atkinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at L.A. Confidential (film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at L.A. Confidential (film), you may be blocked from editing. WP:FILMPLOT is very clear about recommended word counts for plot summaries, and the mere fact that you think your summary is more clear isn't sufficient grounds for ignoring it by hundreds of words. You are welcome to discuss this further at the article's Talk page; perhaps other editors will agree that the guideline should be ignored in this case, but you should not simply reinsert your changes. DonIago (talk) 03:26, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bury F.C.. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosemary King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grayson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Phil Mitchell, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please stop reverting the changes to the lead. It was bloated and full of info not sourced within the article. It certainly does not need a list of every character Phil has ever feuded with. – JuneGloom07 Talk 19:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the List of Emmerdale characters (2011) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. It is possible to add a more concise summary of storylines. Please don't rely on others to do it for you, and remember that plot sections are the least important part of an article. The sourced development is what counts if an article wants to pass notability guidelines. - JuneGloom07 Talk 19:25, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Phil Mitchell. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. You've been warned about this before. We don't need an essay on articles. 5 albert square (talk) 17:07, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Phil Mitchell, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:FANCRUFT and WP:LEAD, and stop expanding articles with large amounts of unsourced detail. – JuneGloom07 Talk 22:00, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Phelan lead problems[edit]

Hello. I know you're one of the primary contributors to this article, so I thought I'd ask if you would have a go at condensing the lead, which is far too long. There's a lot of information that isn't covered in the article, or is excessively detailed. The guide at MOS:LEADLENGTH that might provide you with some help. Thank you. - JuneGloom07 Talk 20:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you exactly mean by condensing? Nicky Haugh (talk) 01:04, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JuneGloom07 condensed it and you expanded it. This is highly disruptive.Rain the 1 21:23, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked on a number of occasions to stop adding excessive amounts of plot to fictional character articles. The case of Pat Phelan is simple - it needs condensing, not expanding. There are hundreds of sources for the character's development, yet you want thousands of words on plot detail only suited to a Coronation Street fan.Rain the 1 23:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Condensing means to make the writing more concise. The previous version of the lead was too long, making it confusing for those who are not familiar with the subject. It was also overly detailed and the information is not sourced within the article. Please read the link I left above, it really is helpful in explaining how big the lead should be in relation to the article's content. I'll add that the article really needs more sourced, real-world information, and I left some sources on the talk page that could be added. - JuneGloom07 Talk 23:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Pat Phelan (Coronation Street), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Expanding unsourced plot information on a tagged article, when you have been asked to condense is disruptive Rain the 1 21:32, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pat Phelan (Coronation Street), you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding fancruft Rain the 1 23:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamie Mitchell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E20 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the Day of the Dead (2008 film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:58, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phil Mitchell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Janet Mitchell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trevor Morgan (EastEnders), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sean Andrews.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Foster (Coronation Street), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Clayton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

Hey! I hope you're well :) At Pat Phelan (Coronation Street), I see that you have dedicated a lot of time expanding the lead. I really thank you for your commitment and dedication, but unfortunately this has been reverted as it is way too long. An overly long lead can put people off reading an article and can be stressful when being overloaded with a lot of information. I am not trying to be mean at all. If you would like to discuss it any further, please let me know! :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 16:12, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Tate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stella Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Details[edit]

Hey, I wanted to thank you for all of your contributions on Wikipedia. I have cut a few of your expansions on the leads of some of the leads, as an overly long lead can put people off reading an article and can be stressful when being overloaded with a lot of information. I am not trying to be mean at all. If you would like to discuss it any further, please let me know! :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 05:17, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lengthy leads[edit]

Hello. I notice that you are still adding lengthy leads to articles. There are quite a few issues with this. Leads should be summaries of the rest of the article – the details you are adding into the leads are covered nowhere else in the article. This makes the information unsourced, which we do not allow on Wikipedia. Also, the sizes of the leads are ridiculously long. See the lead length guideline for the accepted lead lengths. I appreciate the effort you put into your writing, but I do not appreciate your disruptive behaviour. You have been told by more than three editors to stop this behaviour. They have all put it nicely, but I'm here to say it needs to stop as of now. – DarkGlow • 21:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Meena Jutla, you may be blocked from editing. – DarkGlow • 12:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gail Platt. – DarkGlow • 09:12, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptively ignoring community concerns about verifiability and excessive detail voiced here on this page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]