User talk:NinaPfifer

Speedy deletion of Corporate Vision[edit]

A tag has been placed on Corporate Vision, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 19:59, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Maria_Cuadra_actress_circa_1970.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Maria_Cuadra_actress_circa_1970.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Maria_Cuadra_actress_circa_1970.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Maria_Cuadra_actress_circa_1970.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 06:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Corporate Vision Strategists[edit]

A tag has been placed on Corporate Vision Strategists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sting Buzz Me... 12:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Corporate Vision Strategists[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Corporate Vision Strategists meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate Vision Strategists. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Sting Buzz Me... 22:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Melissa Odabash[edit]

Hello NinaPfifer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Melissa Odabash, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Author has not requested deletion, or other users have added substantial content. Thank you. —Kusma (t·c) 12:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Odabash. If you believe the article should be deleted, you will have to start a new deletion discussion. —Kusma (t·c) 12:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kusma - I created the page for Melissa Odabash many years ago and she is requesting for it to be taken down as there are too many personal details. i will propose for deletion again NinaPfifer (talk) 17:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I said in the AFD (which I have formatted for you), you can use the information on our contact page to let us know via e-mail what information should not be in the article. —Kusma (t·c) 15:58, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, NinaPfifer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Melissa Odabash, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 15:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]