Jump to content

User talk:Ninetyone/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


e
Archive 1 ← Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9

Fire and rescue service organisation

The current name is still problematic, so what else would you recommend? Bearcat (talk) 22:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

History of Police

ok no problem, I'll edit and then put it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vaiddauji (talk • contribs) 07:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Virus Nine

Just a friendly note on Virus Nine. While the version you tagged was a painful mess to read, there were a couple of good faith claims of importance -- 500+ performances, multiple releases on a record label. However, notability isn't established, so if you think it's not notable, feel free to take it to AfD. (I'm assuming the creator will contest a prod, just as they contested the speedy.) HTH--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

He's right.

This editor is nothing but disruptive and all of his edits have been reverted, please have a look at his edits. Each and everyone has been reverted, it is a style issue, I am attempting to talk to him and your reverting my revert is not very helpful. (Off2riorob (talk) 22:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC))

I also find that to revert and go is a bit disruptive. Off2riorob (talk) 22:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
all his edits have been reverted or almost all, the edit you have reverted, he has made before more than once. My work here has been to get him to talk as he was editing according to the other editor in question under different ip.s and failed to communicate and they have been following him around and reverting him for quite a while. I am bothered about this not so much the story in the box, it will likely be altered tomorrow by one of the ip's wiki revert stalkers. Off2riorob (talk) 23:33, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

It is disruptive to go around altering consensus style and be constantly reverted and fail to talk about it. (Off2riorob (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC))

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:46, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Yemen and `' etc.

It's taken from the source. However the source itself may not be that reliable (being derived from a more RS by unknown means) so if you have reason to think it is wrong, please cite and change. However some of the names use both marks - so I would hazard that it is correct. Rich Farmbrough, 20:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC).

Question

You made a question you portuguese, but I couldn´t understand it very well. I´m military and if you want you can ask me in english. Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andersonnakamura (talk • contribs) 23:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Ordnungspolizei image dates

Hi. According to the Ordnungspolizei article, it wasn't formed until 1936. But from my reading of the edit history, you added "in 1931" to the caption for the image in the Information Box (using the date in the Bundesarchiv's own documentation of this picture). I don't know if the 1936 foundation date is wrong, the 1931 caption date is wrong, the picture is of policemen belonging to another (older) force, or if there's some other explanation for the discrepancy. But I'm tempted to hide this picture (together with two others with pre-1936 captions) from view in brackets until the anachronism is resolved, or else to replace it with the Infobox's earlier picture of Ordnungspolizei in the Cracow [Krakowa] ghetto in the 1940's.

If you can help me resolve the confusion (one editor somewhere said that the Bundesarchiv's documentation isn't always to be trusted), would you mind responding not to my talk page (since I hate ping-pong exchanges that others can't see) but directly at Talk:Ordnungspolizei#Caption date? Thanks. —— Shakescene (talk) 05:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

re: CFW Machine

Just wanted to let you know CFW Machine has been deleted. You were partially right when you PRODed instead of speedy tagging it, as non-notable products are usually speedy deletable. However, in this case it was a copy & paste form the manufacture's website and thus speedy deletable as a copyright violation.

Articles that sound promotional and/or have messed up formatting (this one fit into both those categories) are often copyright violations. As such, it pays to do a quick internet search using a sentence or two from the article in quotes. (Preferably not the first one, as that one is often changed slightly to fix a pronoun or some such.)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, and let me know if you have any questions. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

IPSA

I've just done some editing to the Independent Parliamentary Standards page - just so you don't think I'm being contrary. The Parliamentary Standards Act received Royal Assent a few weeks back, and the IPSA is nothing to do with the Constitutional Renewal Bill. It's definitely the IPSA, not PSA, and I'm afraid it wont have any jurisdiction over the Lords :( Its also not correct to use the term 'Fees Office', cause such a place doesn't exist, apart from in the media, but as it has now come into common usage, I havent edited it out.

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Law Enforcement in Brazil

Well, sir, that's the question: I don't trust in the neutrality on the article. The reader (Sparks 1979) is a Brazilian Army 2nd LT. And the Brazilian Armed Forces have "liberal" & "conservative" "branches". If u trust in this guy, no problem. But I'm trying to defend my profession Municipal Guards. By the way: We are reconizad by IPA & ILO. Regards.


20:40, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Kingdom_of_Lovely#Proposed_merge

Hello. You may be interested in participating in the above discussion. The JPStalk to me 19:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Policia nacional logo.jpg)

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Policia nacional logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 20:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Policia nacional logo.jpg

Concerning this: I may have forgotten the namespace in the edit summary, but yes, I have compared it with File:Escudo CNP.svg, of course. File:Policia nacional logo.jpg is obviously not an unused duplicate or lower-quality/resolution copy of File:Escudo CNP.svg, thus it doesn't qualify for a WP:CSD#F1 deletion. If nobody objects the switch in the article it will be deleted in 7 days as an orphaned non-free image.
Amalthea 21:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm speechless. I'm trying to speed up the process instead of leaving useless files hanging around. G7? ninety:one (reply on my talk) 21:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
I was just typing this up when you left the message: I've only now noticed that you uploaded it originally, and that it has been removed from the article quite a while ago, so apparently nobody objected to the switch. It still isn't an F1 deletion, which is really only meant to speed up uncontroversial deletion of dupes.
I didn't decline the speedy deletion out of bureaucracy: I found it very conceivable that people might object the switch, since the SVG version is unshaded and looks very flat, quite different from the JPEG version in my opinon.
Cheers, Amalthea 21:18, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: New York City Human Resources Administration Police

They are special officers under subsection 40 of the CPL. "40. Special officers employed by the city of New York or by the New York city health and hospitals corporation; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall be deemed to authorize such officer to carry, possess, repair or dispose of a firearm unless the appropriate license therefor has been issued pursuant to section 400.00 of the penal law." http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86720 MOOOOOPS (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Cross border powers of arrest territorial police

Nice addition to the UK law enforcement page. Good stuff Dibble999 (talk) 18:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 24 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Category:Law enforcement agencies of Turkey

concerning your revision on Category:National law enforcement agencies of Turkey. Sorry, but I don't quite get it. Why should two categories exist on one country with the only difference being the word "national" at the beginning? If there are no "international" agencies such a category should be obsolete or am I missing something on a different aspect, such as should I have started a discussion?. Sc.helm (talk) 21:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

wvep

asl article name els —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.58.66 (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Texas Ranger Division

Hello, Ninetyone. You have new messages at QueenofBattle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ok, but WP:BOLD's brother is to please be careful. Would discussing the split first hurt anything? Also, messing up a FA by adding an expand tag doesn't seem to make too much sense to me. QueenofBattle (talk) 21:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Get better quickly. QueenofBattle (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Nice job on the section split. QueenofBattle (talk) 17:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Deleted posted heading in article:list of police ranks in india

Reason is provided for editing desired statement. If you disagree, kindly also give the reason. Thanks

D.V

Template:Law enforcement in India

As all important Indian templates concering the Govt. of India have the Indian flag just beside their names/tiles. I request you to kindly provide a valid reason of not putting it there. I'll edit and put it there, only when you do not disagree.

Regards D.V

Brown

Hi. I have removed the half blind label that you replaced. I dislike taging people with labels like that without very strong citations, the template Category:Half-blind_people was created only on the 20 sept 2009 by User Paladin and you can see I have left him a note here User_talk:Paladin_R.T. I would appreciate it if you didn't replace it without discussing it with me and also with a strong citation perhaps from him himself stating catagorically that he is half blind or half seeing, whichever way you want to look at it. Regards. Off2riorob (talk) 09:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I did Know about the detached retina, perhaps it has got better, he must get the best medical help, but we can not be sure that he is as described half blind actually I dislike the template so much I am going to ask the creator to delete it or I am going to prod it myself. There is no medical report that states he is half blind. I have removed countless times that he has a glass eye and this can also be found around the internet. If he has even 10 percent of sight in his poor eye has is not half blind, so as a BLP protection I have removed it. We can't add a doctors report that clearly confirms that he is half blind so it is actually detrimental to the article to state that he is. imo. Off2riorob (talk) 18:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
There is no citation that declares strong enough that he is half blind, it is a matter of protection of a living person. Off2riorob (talk) 18:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Avon Fire & Rescue Serivce

Hi Ninetyone!

I notice that you undid my revision on the above page. My reason for deleting the reference and link is due to them being out of date. I owned that website but due to lack of time and money, no longer update it.

Regards, James

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

WOOOOW Thank you!

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

That was fast! Thank you! I just offer a small flower (couldn't find a smile or the right barnstar). Sebastian scha. (talk) 18:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

sign

Regarding signature I'll fix it.


thanks -- LONTECH 06:48, 16 October 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lontech (talk • contribs)

fixed-- LONTECH  Talk  13:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

GlobalAir.com

Hey there, as you can tell I'm new here and attempted my first article which you marked for deletion. I appologize if I have broken any wikipedia standards, I was honestly trying to submit an article I thought useful for many wiki users. If I have broken the rules by doing this however then by all means please remove the article. Sorry to waste any of your time, and I will try to be more careful in the future. Flyguy088 (talk) 20:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

There's no point in warning Mario1987 about copyvios anymore

Sandstein permblocked him. HalfShadow (talk) 21:08, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, looks like there are a few looking him over. I doubt they'll miss anything between them. HalfShadow (talk) 21:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

Josephina Sykes

Hi there-


Please don't delete Josephina Sykes page I'm trying to create! I'm trying to add it up for weeks, I own the copyright of my Bio. I don't see the problem. I would try to do more myself on this site but it isn't user friendly.

Thanks- Nola X. 

(NolaX (talk) 22:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC))

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

WP:NEWT

Hello I just wanted to inform you that there was a thread started that concerns you and other editors at Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at CSD/Coffee. Feel free to comment there! --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 23:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

Speedy deletion declined: J. A. W. Gunn

Hello Ninetyone, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of J. A. W. Gunn - a page you tagged - because: A7: Subject satisfies WP:ACADEMIC. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:40, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

J. A. W. Gunn

No problem. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Royal Latin

You don't have any "knowledge". Mr Cooper is employed until the last day of the month. 78.150.21.20 (talk) 07:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

File:Rabbi Myers.jpg

Why did you speedy that picture. It is an own work, and no reason it should be deleted. Am I missing something? Debresser (talk) 21:36, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

I found the reason: a minor can not release copyright. Sorry for bothering. Debresser (talk) 21:39, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Myers image

Image deleted; thank you. -- Avi (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ninetyone/Archive_7&oldid=1141450780"