User talk:Nizil Shah/Archive 15
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Nizil Shah. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 |
WikiCup 2022 May newsletter
The second round of the 2022 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 115 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top seven contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 11 featured articles and the 79 good articles achieved in total by contestants.
Our top scorers in round 2 were:
Epicgenius, with 1264 points from 2 featured article, 4 good articles and 18 DYKs. Epicgenius was a finalist last year but has now withdrawn from the contest as he pursues a new career path.
AryKun, with 1172 points from two featured articles, one good article and a substantial number of featured article and good article reviews.
Bloom6132, with 605 points from 44 in the news items and 4 DYKs.
Sammi Brie, with 573 points from 8 GAs and 21 DYKs.
Ealdgyth, with 567 points from 11 GAs and 34 good and featured article reviews.
Panini!, with 549 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and several other sources.
Lee Vilenski, with 545 points from 1 FA, 4 GAs and a number of reviews.
The rules for featured and good article reviews require the review to be of sufficient length; brief quick fails and very short reviews will generally not be awarded points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Vohrawad of Siddhpur
Hello, Nizil Shah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vohrawad of Siddhpur".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:49, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 | |
| One year! |
|---|
Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Wrt to rating of article Devayat Bodar
Dear Senior Editor, How has the article got rating C when there are only two references given on the page and both of which are questionable. Please see Devayat Bodar, in my view it should be classed as stub. Thanks and Best RS6784 (talk) 11:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Monson Mavunkal
Hello, Nizil Shah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monson Mavunkal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
New article review request, Purulia Pumped Storage Power Station
Can you review the article I just created?❯❯❯Pravega g=9.8 05:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review.❯❯❯Pravega g=9.8 11:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nayika Devi
Did this movie release as per schedule on 6 May? I'm not seeing any reviews or box office etc. From the trailers, the movie looked high budget but I don't see any hype around it. 49.207.206.53 (talk) 18:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, it was released on 6 May. See this Ref.- Nizil (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2022 July newsletter
The third round of the 2022 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 180 points, which is a lower figure than last year when 294 points were needed to progress to round 4. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
BennyOnTheLoose, with 746 points, a tally built both on snooker and other sports topics, and on more general subjects.- Bloom6132, with 683 points, garnered mostly from "In the news" items and related DYKs.
Sammi Brie, with 527, from a variety of submissions related to radio and television stations.
Between them contestants achieved 5 featured articles, 4 featured lists, 51 good articles, 149 DYK entries, 68 ITN entries, and 109 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article nomination, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. WikiCup judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Mandalika III
Mandalika III article needed update not reverting the update.in that article alternative sources clam different views. Jadeja97 (talk) 20:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Monson Mavunkal for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monson Mavunkal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:21, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Shrimad Rajchandra page edits
Thank you for your comments Nizil. I am new to editing on wikipedia but I have understood what your are saying. I have tried to use more neutral language in the additions i am proposing under each section below as these are important facts that would help a reader understand more about Shrimad Rajchandra. I have also tried to cite all the factual statements and have referenced the page numbers as well. Nonetheless, do let me know what other amendments need to be made! Thankyou for your cooperation and patience-
Family life:
This is evidenced through his writings in [1], a 108 chapter short-text, which he wrote at the age of 16. Sharing his views on family life and spirituality, he writes
“The pleasure, which I get from religion, conduct, morality and scriptural study, is indescribable. I have the aspiration to give up all types of connections.”
Business: Despite being a successful businessman, his focus remained on his spiritual pursuits. In Gandhi’s autobiographical book “The Story of My Experiments with Truth”, Gandhiji writes "Raichandbhai's commercial transactions covered hundreds of thousands. He was a connoisseur of pearls and diamonds. But these things were not the centre round which his life revolved. That centre was the passion to see God face to face…The man who, immediately on finishing his talk about weighty business transactions, began to write about the hidden things of the spirit could evidently not be a businessman at all, but a real seeker after Truth.I saw him thus absorbed in Godly pursuits in the midst of business, not once or twice, but very often. I never saw him lose his state of equipoise."
Last years: On the eve of departure he said to his brother, Manukhbhai, and others “Don’t worry, this soul is eternal, it is surely going to attain a very high state.”
In popular culture (adding on to Yugpurush the drama) Yugpurush’ was performed 1030 times in in 306 cities across the world. To educate a wide and diverse audience regarding the principles of Shrimadji which moulded Mahatma Gandhi’s character, the play was performed in Gujarati, Hindi, Marathi , Kannada, Bengali, Tamil & English and in India, USA, Canada, UK , Europe, UAE, Oman and Africa, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Australia, New Zealand etc. In addition to the Transmedia Gujarati Screen and Stage Awards for the Best Drama, Best Director and Best Actor in a Supporting Role, Yugpurush is bestowed with the prestigious Dadasaheb Phalke Excellence Award 2017 for ‘Best Drama’! Yugpurush was also the first Indian event staged at the prestigious Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, Los Angeles where the world-famous Oscars Awards Ceremony are held. The play supported the cause of Shrimad Rajchandra Hospital – a new 200-bed multi-specialty charity hospital for the economically underprivileged in South Gujarat.
Please let me know if this is okay to be published or the revisions that need to be made. Relevant citations from books such as mokshmala and My experiments with truth will be added once approved.
Thank You
Long quotes as you suggested are unnecessary and not according to Wikipedia guidelines. So we better avoid them. Regarding play, there is a separate article. - Nizil (talk) 13:59, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Tasnim Mir
Hello, Nizil Shah. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tasnim Mir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2022 September newsletter
The fourth round of the WikiCup has now finished. 383 points were required to reach the final, and the new round has got off to a flying start with all finalists already scoring. In round 4, Bloom6132 with 939 points was the highest points-scorer, with a combination of DYKs and In the news items, followed by BennyOnTheLoose, Sammi Brie and Lee Vilenski. The points of all contestants are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.
At this stage, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For the remaining competitors, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and importantly, before the deadline on October 31st!
If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. The judges are Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Goradia has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Nizil (talk) 07:50, 10 September 2022 (UTC)New Article
Hello. After long time. Hope you are well. I was out of Gujarat. I changed my username from Imfarhad. Can you please review Admitted? It won National Award this year. Thanks. Ishi6181 (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Done.- Nizil (talk) 12:34, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Ishi6181 (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ambika Temple, Girnar, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kalpasutra and Ambika.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Dear Nizil, I have noticed that, in article H. J. Kania, The first Chief Justice of India, seems to be a flaw in Kania's name. as per article his name is Hiralal but i think his name was Harilal. i had checked it on Gujarati Vishwkosh and few other references. would you please guide me about this?
Ref:
- H. J. Kania Wiki (everipedia.org) [1]
- What Happened 71 Years Ago, When the Vision of the Supreme Court Was First Laid Out (thebetterindia.com) [2]
- Govt Law College [3]
- Historical Series: Justice Harilal Kania and The Criminal Contempt Case of 1942 – The Leaflet [4]
- Harilal Jekisundas Kania Biography - Birth date, Achievements, Career, Family, Awards - SamanyaGyan.com [5]
Snehrashmi (talk) 14:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
- Correct it. His name was Harilal. Leave a note on talkpage. The above mentioned references are not considered reliable so dont cite them. Search Harilal Kania in Google Books and you will find plenty of reliable refs. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 05:25, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
- I think the confusion is because of Madhukar Hiralal Kania. He was 23rd Chief Justice of India and nephew of Harilal Kania, but his father's name might be confused with Harilal as Hiralal. I Leave a note on talk page. Thank you very much for your guidance. Snehrashmi (talk) 11:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Mangadh massacre
Hello, Nizil Shah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mangadh massacre".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 05:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
WikiCup 2022 November newsletter
The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is
- Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
- Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
- BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were- Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.
During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.
- Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
- Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.- Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
- Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.- Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
- Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
- Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
- Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
November 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- What a joke! --Gazal world (talk) 18:23, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Please don't edit against community wide consensus on MOS:INDELECT. Continuously editing the section name from Schedule to 'electoral process' is incorrect, since no info on electoral process is in that section. Discuss on talk page for consensus. Dhruv edits (talk) 18:34, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Well, I could not find a community consensus on MOS:INDELECT. Can you point where was discussion about MOS held? Btw, I will follow MOS for now but may need necessary amendments in the future. Thanks,- Nizil (talk) 06:27, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Random query
Dear Nizil Sorry to bother. I wondered whether I was worthy of joining any India projects?? Whispyhistory (talk) 20:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Not much. Most WikiProjects related to India are not active enough. On talkpages of them, sometimes discussions are held about specific issues, guidelines or articles. You can watchlist them if you like to participate in them. I have joined many of them but just for sake of being participant in India related projects. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 04:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, will have a look. thanks Whispyhistory (talk) 05:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
New Edit Support
Hi Nizhil,
I am new to wikipedia edits. I was writing about AVERA Mobility. I need support in publishing the article. As you have already wrote about ATHER, AVERA also into electric mobility. 117.202.39.43 (talk) 08:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for Draft:Avera Mobility. The article needs a lot of trimming. Please remove every sentence which is not supported by any reference. There are some references so article can pass but it currently reads like advertisement. Wikipedia should read like an encyclopedia. Write in plain language without any flowery words. Only major awards supported by references should be there. Even if article become very short, it is importance that the information provided should be verifiable by references. Once you have done it, please message me here. I will help copyedit it. Note that if you are associated with company in any capacity, please declare your affiliation on the talkpage of the article, see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure for more details. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in December 2022
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Niren Bhatt
I think lyricist Niren Bhatt is now notable too. He has written lyrics for multiple films as well as the writer for movie Bhediya. So I have created the page Niren Bhatt. Let's get into a decent shape. Coderzombie (talk) 06:58, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes. I was thinking the same. They are many instances where he needs to be linked too. Thank you for creating it. Kutch Express (film) needs your attention too. :) -Nizil (talk) 07:45, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
 
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to the 2023 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2023 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Sacnilk
A user is removing all the boxoffice data with sacnilk as a source. Do we want to contest it? I have been using it recently in some articles as well, but honestly I am not going to fight for it, so I am ok with the removal too. Coderzombie (talk) 06:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Let it be so. Sacnilk has been contested in past and others do not consider it reliable. We used it only because we have no other sources for BO figures of Gujarati films. It is a lost cause. There is no way to prove it as a reliable source. :( -Nizil (talk) 16:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2023 March newsletter
So ends the first round of the 2023 WikiCup. Everyone with a positive score moved on to Round 2, with 54 contestants qualifying. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Unlimitedlead with 1205 points, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with two featured articles on historical figures and several featured article candidate reviews.- Epicgenius was in second place with 789 points; a seasoned WikiCup competitor he specialises in buildings and locations in New York.
FrB.TG was in third place with 625 points, garnered from a featured article on a filmmaker which qualified for an impressive number of bonus points.- TheJoebro64, another WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points gained from two featured articles on video games.
Iazyges was in fifth place with 532 points, from two featured articles on classical history.
The top sixteen contestants at the end of Round 1 had all scored over 300 points; these included 
LunaEatsTuna, 
Thebiguglyalien, 
Sammi Brie, 
Trainsandotherthings, 
Lee Vilenski, 
Juxlos, 
Unexpectedlydian, 
SounderBruce, 
Kosack, 
BennyOnTheLoose and 
PCN02WPS. It was a high-scoring start to the competition.
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. The first round finished on February 26. Remember that any content promoted after that date but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Some contestants made claims before the new submissions pages were set up, and they will need to resubmit them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Gujarat Metro Rail Corporation Ltd Logo Ahmedabad Metro.png
Thanks for uploading File:Gujarat Metro Rail Corporation Ltd Logo Ahmedabad Metro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claude Batley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln House.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Gujarati Asmita
Hello, Nizil Shah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gujarati Asmita".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you.- Nizil (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Shakereh Khaleeli
Dear Mr Nizil Shah,
My name is Begum Esmath Khaleeli Clark, I am Shakereh Khaleeli’s youngest daughter. I would like to know why there are so many inaccurate changes on my mothers Wikipedia page? Starting with her date of Birth amongst other things and Why have I been blocked from editing the page?
Please let me know at the soonest.
Thank You Begum72 (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- ^ “Mokshamala’