User talk:Nk TheWikipedian

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Nk TheWikipedian, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Pondicherry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content protocols, and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are struck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 16:50, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 07:17, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I messaged you in your talk box Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 10:05, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DMK[edit]

Hi Nk TheWikipedian, Welcome to wikipedia.

The potlitical position is not for the party's rank, it about the party's ideological leanings like center, right wing, left wing etc..
You have changed the number total number of seats of lok sabha and rajya sabha in this edit. Both have 543 and 245 seats total seats respectively. The 2019 general election results are already in the article Dravida_Munnetra_Kazhagam#2019_General_election_–_Secular_Progressive_Alliance. SUN EYE 1 12:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any other questions, feel free to ask me. Happy editing SUN EYE 1 12:13, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add[edit]

I'm reverting your changes in Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, don't add it back. Also read WP:DISRUPT. SUN EYE 1 16:23, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding tn assembly[edit]

Your works here should be unbiased not biased. change urs Nahtrav (talk)

What edit did u do in TN assembly in last election tag. It's is for the last assembly election. But u put the no.of seats before,and this is a biased one.Nahtrav (talk)

Ok... I understand. Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.. Sorrry.. I made it by mistake.. Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 11:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Tamil Nadu Assembly.svg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tamil Nadu Assembly.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:45, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Pondicherry[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Pondicherry. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. 220 of ^Borg 16:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copying pages, etc[edit]

Hi there.
Re the above message, on Wikipaedia (WP) it is not permitted to just take the content from an article, that other people have written, and claim it as your own, esp. by saying "I created this page" or similar without (at least) providing attribution to the source WP page/s. See WP: Copying within Wikipedia for more info. If the pages name needs changing, then MOVE is the right method. Otherwise this could be regarded as a WP:Cut and paste attempt to rename a page, which is undesirable.

There are also TWO drafts, the same or similar, that you created. You can get them deleted by blanking the pages, and an edit summary saying you want them deleted would help.

Regards, 220 of ^Borg 17:10, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page User:Nk TheWikipedian/sandbox, also apparently copied from the original Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam page, will have to be deleted too. Sorry, I hope you understand. 220 of ^Borg 17:27, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for Puducherry Dmk.... Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I realised after a while, but you still can't just copy other editors work. I don't think a branch of a political party rates it's own Wikipaedia page. WP: NOTABILITY. Probably just needs a line in the main article indicating a branch location? 220 of ^Borg 20:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Pondicherry, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Crazy Boy 826 17:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nk TheWikipedian. This is your user talk page; the purpose of this page is for notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or self-promotion. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or create new articles. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Pondicherry. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:58, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 02:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:43, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding blocking me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nk TheWikipedian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new for editing Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 04:34, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nk TheWikipedian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am new to wikipedia

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok.. I understand what i did.. So please unblock me... Now Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 06:10, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me... Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 12:55, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: This editor went right back to disruptive editing after the block was lifted. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Congress Sandesh[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Congress Sandesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ingratis (talk) 16:49, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.i deleted. Nk TheWikipedian (talk) 17:00, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nivas. K[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nivas. K requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Crazy Boy 826 18:05, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Suneye1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 05:24, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nivas. K[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nivas. K requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 09:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nivas. K moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Nivas. K, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 13:01, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nivas. K[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Nivas. K, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 13:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NSUI Puducherry moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, NSUI Puducherry, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nivas. K[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nivas. K, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NSUI PUDUCHERRY[edit]

The article NSUI PUDUCHERRY has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GPL93 (talk) 16:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Talk:NSUI PUDUCHERRY. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

I'm not really sure what you're up to. Please take a look through Help:Getting started and some of the other pages that it links to. This will probably prevent you from being blocked again. You can ask for help if you need it at the Teahouse. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate editor is now also socking at User:NSUI PUDUCHERRY to get around a previous deletion. GPL93 (talk) 12:28, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nk TheWikipedian, this constant low-level disruption needs to stop. You were temporarily blocked, and now you're finding new ways to be disruptive. What usually happens is that people end up indefinitely blocked per WP:NOTHERE when this happens. Your article NSUI PUDUCHERRY was effectively speedy deleted via WP:A7, so I don't think WP:G4 applies. But this draft doesn't belong on a user page, and it really doesn't need to exist on the user page of a sock puppet. This is getting to be a burden on admins and other editors, and you need to start following our rules more closely. I've already told you about the Teahouse, so you can't pretend that you don't know where to get help or ask questions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:56, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NSUI PUDUCHERRY for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NSUI PUDUCHERRY is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NSUI PUDUCHERRY until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GPL93 (talk) 17:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kalyana Sundaram moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Kalyana Sundaram, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 10:54, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nk TheWikipedian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry.. I now only read the Article Wizard of Wikipedia... So now I Understand how to create Articles in wikipedia.. So I request you to unblock me..

Decline reason:

This is not relevant to your block. See WP:GAB to understand how to address the reasons for your block. Yamla (talk) 17:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your UTRS Account[edit]

You have no wikis in which you meet the requirements for UTRS. Your account has been removed and you will be required to reregister once you meet the requirements. If you are blocked on any wiki that UTRS uses, please resolve that before registering agian also. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Nk TheWikipedian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:38, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pondicherry DMK[edit]

Hello, Nk TheWikipedian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pondicherry DMK".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Pondicherry[edit]

Hello, Nk TheWikipedian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Pondicherry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kalyana Sundaram[edit]

Hello, Nk TheWikipedian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kalyana Sundaram".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:19, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NSUI Puducherry[edit]

Hello, Nk TheWikipedian. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NSUI Puducherry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]