User talk:No name22

Welcome!

Hello, No name22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:04, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anthony James Rogers

The article Anthony James Rogers has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Madg2011 (talk) 22:06, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the proposed deletion tag for this article after adding two references to this article. The problem is neither reference is considered a reliable source. One you had was to Wikipedia itself, which generates a loop of "person is notable because Wikipedia says so", which does not hold water. The other was to IMDB, which also is not a reliable source. Please see WP:IMDBREF. Since neither of these sources are a reliable source, I have removed them, and re-added the proposed deletion tag that you removed. Please do not remove it again without finding reliable sources supporting content on this article. Please be aware; I took a look around trying to find reliable sources to add, and found nothing. This person's only claims to fame are a minor part in one released movie, and involvement in two film projects that are as yet incomplete. That's not enough. Please see WP:NACTOR. If you have questions, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 13:58, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Despite my information you above that IMDB is not a reliable source, you've re-added it anyway and removed the proposed deletion template. Why? I've undone your edits. Please do not do this again. PLEASE read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Continuing to add non-reliable sources such as IMDB and removing the proposed deletion tag will NOT result in what you want, and may lead to a block of your editing privileges. If you're uncertain about how to proceed, ask. I'll help you. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And now you're adding a reference that doesn't mention Rogers. Ok, how about you pause in your editing of this article, and talk with me? I'd be happy to help, but you need to talk. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:28, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, is this how I answer you? What do I do to keep this link? And his pictures keep getting deleted too...— Preceding unsigned comment added by No name22 (talk • contribs)

Yes, you're answering properly :) What you do is find reliable sources that attest to his notability. Simply because he is an actor is not enough. There's two things here that are crucial, which I've directed you to before. You've really got to read these; WP:RS and WP:NACTOR. As for the images, they keep getting removed because as I explained above, they are copyright violations. You can't take an image from IMDB, claim it as your own, and upload it to Commons. That violates copyright. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:10, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Sorry on delay in responses, I saw your comments and was trying to fix everything while being too stupid to respond. Ha. I took the IMDB photos and he's a big comedian https://www.facebook.com/afrstl

Can you provide any proof that you took those images? As is, there's no way to verify this is the case. To us, it simply looks like they were taken from IMDB. You should have a read through WP:DONATEIMAGE. Also, if he's a "big" comedian, I'm sure you can find reliable sources (and Facebook, other wikis, IMDB do not count as reliable sources) attesting to his fame as a comedian. I looked around and found nothing. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:34, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure on proof, how would you like me to prove it? And Anthony's Facebook is verified, which is what they do for public figures and what in today's world consider people in the industry, which is why I linked it. Under normal circumstances, I definitely wouldn't use Facebook as an example.

Should I find press links or something? Since links to info about his movie on Netflix and the Netflix link itself isn't enough proof.

That a facebook page is verified as belonging to a particular person does not make that Facebook page a reliable secondary source. Have a look at WP:FACEBOOK, and also understand WP:SECONDARY. Think of it this way; let's say I claim I'm famous. So, I make a Facebook page, prove it's me that made the page, and then I have a friend make an article here on Wikipedia about me, using that Facebook page as "proof" that I am notable. See the problem? Just because I am saying I am famous doesn't make me famous, and having a Facebook profile proves nothing except that I know how to make a Facebook profile. Try finding reliable secondary sources. For example, go to news.google.com, and see what you can find about him in news articles. I tried doing this and came up with nothing. Maybe you can find a search that will reveal sources that attest to his notability. As is, he's simply a minor actor. Have a read through WP:NACTOR. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sure: https://thedirty.com/dirty-army/netflix-star-and-comedian-anthony-rogers-has-no-chill/#post-2198360

Here's a Washington Post article about him and Gavin (creator of VICE): https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2014/10/21/inside-the-contradictory-world-of-thought-catalog-one-of-the-internets-most-reviled-sites/?noredirect=on

Here's a local publication's post: https://www.riverfronttimes.com/artsblog/2017/06/09/st-louis-comedians-offensive-posts-are-no-laughing-matter-to-vess-soda

Do these count? Thanks man.

Images you have uploaded to Commons

Twice now you have uploaded images to Commons under the claim that these were your images. They have been taken from IMDB. Please understand you can not take images from a website somewhere on the Internet, claim them as yours, and upload them to Commons. We do not permit this behavior as it violates copyright. The act of downloading and re-uploading of the image to another site does not transfer copyrights from the author to you. Please stop this behavior. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Rogers (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bradv was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article was resubmitted without any improvements.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Rogers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anthony Rogers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brad v 02:18, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, No name22! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brad v 02:18, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Those links are credible sources and he is the main subject of each page. The Washington Post one is about him and Gavin from VICE getting fired from Thought Catalog and the other two are literally about him.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Rogers (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks the formality needed in an encyclopedia article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Rogers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anthony Rogers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:34, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Rogers (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"world freaked out", for example

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Rogers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anthony Rogers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anthony Rogers presents

The article Anthony Rogers presents has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:V, depends on original research.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cryptic Canadian 01:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, No name22. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Anthony Rogers presents, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Cryptic Canadian 01:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Watch This Movie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Watch This Movie, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Sam Sailor 19:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Saint Louis Times moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Saint Louis Times, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 17:32, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anthony Rogers (artist) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anthony Rogers (artist), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anthony Rogers (artist)

Hello, No name22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Rogers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:01, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:AnthonyRogers.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AnthonyRogers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Saint Louis Times concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Saint Louis Times, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Saint Louis Times

Hello, No name22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Saint Louis Times".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:54, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony Rogers (writer) (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If this draft is accepted, an entry will need to be added to the disambiguation page for the primary name.

The disambiguation page for the primary name is Anthony Rogers.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NENT for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against. Does not satisfy political notability or notability for creative professions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anthony Rogers (writer) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anthony Rogers (writer), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anthony Rogers (artist)

Hello, No name22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Rogers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anthony Rogers (writer)

Hello, No name22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Rogers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anthony Rogers (artist)

Hello, No name22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anthony Rogers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:46, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]