User talk:Noname479

January 2018[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

picture[edit]

I didn't mean it was you. Someone uploaded a picture that said "own work". That's what I meant by 'your' picture. Can you prove that you personally took the picture? Anyway, there are very strict rules about using pictures on wikipedia, and this one does not seem to qualify. See WP:IUP for starters.Bollyjeff | talk 21:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shah Rukh Khan have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Extremely obvious what you're doing here - the picture doesn't add anything to the article, and article subject is obviously not the subject of the photo. Crop it to just SRK and maybe. Ravensfire (talk) 22:31, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse Question[edit]

Hello, Noname479. I have answered your question about referencing at the Teahouse. I have also commented that the way you've set your username to display makes it virtually impossible to see at the moment. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 17:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Kukreja (May 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

:* source are mainly primary - need independent reliable source

* please see notability guidelines and make sure subject meet the said guidelines prior resubmit veritable source as indicated above prior resubmit.

Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjay Kukreja and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjay Kukreja, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noname479! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Noname479. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?[edit]

Hello, Noname479! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Noname479. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:51, 26 May 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Noname479! You created a thread called Submission at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Delivered by Muninnbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sanjay Kukreja[edit]

Hello, Noname479. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sanjay Kukreja".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sanjay Kukreja[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sanjay Kukreja, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 00:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]