User talk:Nori2001

Welcome![edit]

Hello, AlbnorRagibi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 21:44, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2022–23 FC Barcelona Femení season[edit]

Hello, Nori2001

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meena, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, 2022–23 FC Barcelona Femení season, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meena}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– Meena • 11:00, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2022–23 FC Barcelona Femení season[edit]

Hello, Nori2001,

Thank you for creating 2022–23 FC Barcelona Femení season.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Sources from independent WP:RS will help to improve the article further.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meena}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– Meena • 13:58, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

Hey, with this edit, you added things to the box who are not needed (round, event...) I assume you use visual editor, which does things like this. Kante4 (talk) 21:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your message on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2022_FIFA_World_Cup[edit]

On Talk:2022 FIFA World Cup I replied to your edit to my clarification request, which you hid again, by the way. Since your user name appeared in read there, I assume you may not be reachable by a “reply to”.Redav (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only hid it so it won't be distracting for the readers, and I knew that you would see my reply in the source code. Sorry if I made it hard for you to find the reply, it wasn't my intention.

Thank you for writing, I replied back in the Talk discussion, and hopefully this "issue" can be considered resolved.

Thank you for your understanding and have a good day/night depending on where you're from. Nori2001 (talk) 16:26, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of sourced content[edit]

Hello, I'm GenoV84. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2022 FIFA World Cup without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GenoV84 (talk) 00:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I only removed that part because waving a national flag shouldn't be considered as hatred towards anyone, and that specific line was removed by a lot of other editors before me during the World Cup, because they also agreed that it isn't relevant to that particular section. And everyone understood why it shouldn't be written back in the article, and it wasn't added back until the last days of the World Cup (don't know by who), so when I removed this part it was because I was trying to return that section to the original way it was written before being added back sneakily by some editor. I hope I have clarified the reason for the removal of that part of the text. Thank you for your understanding, and don't hesitate to write back if you have any more questions. I won't remove it again and I'll leave it up to you to decide, but I believe that waving a flag shouldn't be considered as a hostile act of hatred against a country or people, therefore I think it shouldn't be in the article, however, as I already said, the final decision is yours. Nori2001 (talk) 01:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you for explaining that. As the cited references state, Arab fans attending the World Cup were waving Palestinian flags and chanting anti-Israeli slogans against Israeli visitors and fans. That's why it is better to keep these informations in the article, both for contextual accuracy and broader understanding to the readers. GenoV84 (talk) 02:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles III requested move discussion[edit]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024[edit]

Your edit to Messi's World Cup: The Rise of a Legend has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:13, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mistake, it wasn't intentional. I have now added a short description of the show that doesn't violate any copyrights, and will do the same for the episode descriptions in the next few days. Thanks for the feedback and explanation. Nori2001 (talk) 20:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also had to remove most of the lead, because it was copied from https://www.ign.com/videos/messis-world-cup-the-rise-of-a-legend-official-teaser-trailer. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 20:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I won't, it was an honest mistake, since I wasn't really familiar with the copyright material rules in regards to TV show articles. Again, thanks for informing me so I won't make the same mistake in the future. Nori2001 (talk) 00:00, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finding consensus at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza[edit]

Hey, thanks for pitching in at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza. More attention on the subject can help the community come to a reasonable decision. But I noticed the input you provided is based on your personal analysis of the subject. This type of input can be counterproductive, because consensus on Wikipedia should be based on reliable sources and policy-based arguments. In the case of a page move, arguments should be based on what the subject is explicitly called in reliable sources, not what individual editors understand or determine it to be. Personal interpretation or analysis is generally given little to no weight when determining the results of the discussion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I based my input on the South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention) case in which the ICJ accepted the "plausibility" that some Palestinian rights under the convention were violated, with the final judgement on the case coming after a few years. I'm sorry if it came across as a "personal analysis", I only based my argument on the current findings and judgements of the ICJ case, nothing else. Nori2001 (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate edit summary[edit]

In your edit summary here you say you are making a routine change in the date format ("Date fix from Oct. 7 to 7 October"), which you did. You also added a word not in the source ("alleged"). Please desist. Thank you. Coretheapple (talk) 18:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I realized that it was a mistake after checking the source and was on my way to remove the changes but you had already beaten me to it, anyways thanks for the correction. Nori2001 (talk) 19:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I appreciate your transparency on this. Coretheapple (talk) 19:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]