Jump to content

User talk:Pregoscientist1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:ObsGynaeCam)

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, ObsGynaeCam, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CrazyBoy826 18:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with... Pls help correctly moving the article Gordon C. S. Smith from my userspace to wikipedia: it seems to retain the userspace name as a title. --ObsGynaeCam (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC) ObsGynaeCam (talk) 20:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page, User:ObsGynaeCam/sandbox GordonSmith, has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be advertising which only promoted or publicized someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 331dot (talk) 20:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

[edit]
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 20:16, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

response on blocked account

[edit]
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pregoscientist1 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

The previous username was unintentionally picked as an organization name. I now understand that this is not allowed and I changed it to a personal nickname for myself. The account was never intended to be an organizational account. I was trying to create few articles, which were not promotional but rather informative and educational. The POP study article describes a study which is now finished, so the page was not intended as a recruitment tool. The biography article on Prof Gordon CS Smith was not intended to promote him personally and is similar to many other articles on prominent academics on Wikipedia. I created this account and these articles because I am a scientist working in the pregnancy field and I intend to contribute to other articles relevant to my expertise

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]