User talk:Okredgreen

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Okredgreen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! DiverseMentality 07:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please only use reliable sources per WP:RS and don't add original research, per WP:OR — Realist² 21:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Use reliable sources only, read WP:RS again, clearly you didn't last time. — Realist² 22:12, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are not reliable though, reliable sources will report it soon, you just have to be patient. — Realist² 22:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Womanizer (song), you will be blocked from editing. — Realist² 15:22, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. I've just watched you go around 6 articles adding unsourced chart positions to articles. Stop doing this. — Realist² 03:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

No, I can't stop. Please provide some reliable sources that they are unofficial (a source like MTV, or Eminem's website) and that they should not be included in the infobox (that would have to be a Wikipedia policy which I'm unaware of). Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 00:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why would I? Those are singles, thus they're in the singles section of the infobox. The section is for singles, which does not rule out "unofficial" singles from being there. Your unsourced edits will be reverted by me each time you don't provide a source and explanation. Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah sure who wouldn't stop arguing when he has no proof of his claims? And I'm still reverting unsourced opinions. Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 03:09, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I never ever claimed or behaved like I own an article. I'm reverting whatever is unsourced or doesn't comply with Wikipedia policies. Your cpntributions are never explained nor sourced. Somehow you believe your opinion is relevant, whereas it is not. What matters are reliable sources and Wikipedia policies. Other things are irrelevant. Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 03:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 03:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Daniil Maslyuk (talk) 03:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:SheWolf545.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SheWolf545.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters (talk) 07:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SheWolf545.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SheWolf545.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]