User talk:Oliver diamond

September 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Tropicalkitty. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cleopas Dlamini—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Tropicalkitty (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gordon Rugg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PopoDameron (talk) 03:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 3robi, you may be blocked from editing. PopoDameron (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of North Star High School (Montana)[edit]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as North Star High School (Montana), is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Storchy (talk) 05:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technically not outright Wikipedia:Vandalism, but as close as that to be pretty much indistinguishable. There appears to be a school of this name that might pass WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES but would probably be WP:REDIRECT-ed to its district. Whatever the situation, this is not the way to start an article. Please don't do that again, Oliver. --User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at September 11 attacks, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop making totally unnecessary changes, without explanation. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 11:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Doctor Mike. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 00:44, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below this notice. Materialscientist (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Water—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]