User talk:Openharmoir

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Naidu, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 14:23, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adari Tulasi rao moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Adari Tulasi rao, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 16:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

plz delete that article i would write once again properly Openharmoir (talk) 15:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bhogalingeswara swamy temple for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhogalingeswara swamy temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhogalingeswara swamy temple until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sri Gowri Parameswara Temple for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sri Gowri Parameswara Temple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sri Gowri Parameswara Temple until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— DaxServer (t · m · e · c) 18:26, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this temple is 122 years old so it is prominent to be as a page Openharmoir (talk) 14:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Naidu999 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naidu999. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 16:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock me[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Openharmoir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Openharmoir (talk) 15:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nothing you say below even attempts to address the violations of WP:SOCK and WP:EVADE. Yamla (talk) 15:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of naidu999.i didn't done anything.i didn't copied anything sill I was blocked.i never did unfair things .kindly look into this matter @Girth Summit.i did my own work still I was blocked,this is not fair plz look into this seriously — Preceding unsigned comment added by Openharmoir (talk • contribs)

unblock me and blocked unfairly[edit]

I had my own work still I was blocked of suspection?? many users might have used the same source or might be a coincidence that doesn't mean that both are same.i never engaged in any edit war but that suspected account have many edit wars,how I can be that person.kindly do a proper investigation and come to conclusion??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Openharmoir (talk • contribs)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Openharmoir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Openharmoir (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We generally don't provide the evidence in these cases as it would make it easier to figure out how to evade detection. Also, I notice that it doesn't appear you are a native English speaker, and your shortcomings in that area are maybe a reason you should edit the Wikipedia in your native language. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. why I was blocked kindly provide the evidence,i didn't done anything wrongly block should be reversed as I didn't done anything wrong ..kindly all the edits and come to conclusion as I did my work and contributed to wki,still I was blocked kindly look into this issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by Openharmoir (talk • contribs)

Beesetti Apparao moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Beesetti Apparao. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and Comment: notable if he was elected to a state assembly, but has too many problems to continue to languish in mainspace.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buddha Mahalakshmi Naidu moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Buddha Mahalakshmi Naidu. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it has too many problems of language or grammar. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:00, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Openharmoir&oldid=1172831186"