User talk:PRISH123

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Grabup. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 125 SATA Regiment (India) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GrabUp - Talk 06:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GrabUp

I am amending the page as per the latest guidelines perculated down. the prebious data has been out dated and requires modifications. Please dont undo the corrections. Thanks. PRISH123 (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at 125 SATA Regiment (India), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. GrabUp - Talk 06:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 125 SATA Regiment (India), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 125 SATA Regiment (India) was changed by PRISH123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909061 on 2024-05-24T06:26:19+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the previously uploaded content was not correct and hence, had to be updated to the current format. PRISH123 (talk) 12:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the one hand, your formatting was improper for Wikipedia standards. You used all capitals improperly (see MOS:ALLCAPS). You did not provide reliable sources for your additions, and you deleted the references from the prior version. You also deleted the categories at the bottom of the article for classification of it. —C.Fred (talk) 12:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at 125 SATA Regiment (India). Sadustu Tau (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 125 SATA Regiment (India), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The History section you added lack any references to reliable sources, preferably independent secondary sources, about the history of the unit. —C.Fred (talk) 12:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Repeating the warning above: this edit is unacceptable, and a repeat will result in your account being blocked. You removed all references for the unit awards, and the section is improperly formatted in all caps. —C.Fred (talk) 12:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, as per the guidelines perculated to us from the higher HQs. We are not supposed to give out sensitive data, like the detail of the operations on wikipedia and hence, the necessary amendments are being carried out. All unit references had to be removed because putting the same is against the norms of disclosing data on the internet. I hope you understand. Thanks. PRISH123 (talk) 13:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First, if you're editing on the directive of a commanding officer, you need to make the necessary paid editing disclosures as required by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Second, even if you're not editing under a direct order or within your MOS (or whatever the Indian Army calls them), you have a conflict of interest due to your connection with the unit.

Finally, the norm is to cite the sources for the information, especially when the sources have already been published on the internet! —C.Fred (talk) 13:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,

These directions have been received pan Indian Army to Update/Create a page of the respective units under the following subheads i.e History, ONLY the names of the Operations participated (Not the details of it), Gallantry Awards (if any)/Citations and Achievement in Sports, if any.

Balance data to be removed.

If you will be kind enough to scroll through other pages, all the units are updating their data in the said format.

Requesting you to kindly allow the same.

Thankyou. :) PRISH123 (talk) 13:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which "other pages" are you referring to?

And you still need to declare a conflict of interest regardless. Procyon117 (talk) 14:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 'other pages' are the other pages of the Regiments of Indian Army .

How do i declare conflict of interest?

Also, if you can guide me on how to delete this page and make a new one, if that will be a better option? PRISH123 (talk) 14:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See this to declare a conflict of interest. If your contributions are paid, see here as mentioned by C.Fred earlier in this thread.

And you do not need to delete the page and make a new one. Use what's already there. Procyon117 (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have mentioned appropriate references and will further add more for its authenticity. Thank you :) PRISH123 (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which references? I don't see where you mentioned any. —C.Fred (talk) 17:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 17:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since I've seen similar edits on other articles, I've filed the noticeboard incident to alert other editors that, for lack of a better phrase, Wikipedia is under attack by the Indian army. —C.Fred (talk) 17:15, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —Ingenuity (t • c) 11:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 111 Rocket Regiment for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 111 Rocket Regiment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/111 Rocket Regiment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mdann52 (talk) 13:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]