Jump to content

User talk:Pepperide

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Pepperide, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asplenium cimmeriorum has been accepted[edit]

Asplenium cimmeriorum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 19:49, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pepperide (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't understand what you mean by "Checkuser block". I understand what a Checkuser block is, but the fact is, I've never abused another account because I simply don't have one. I've made nothing but positive contribution to Wikipedia since I've created this account.

Decline reason:

I have used the checkuser tool and can confirm that your account is  Technically indistinguishable to Libertydom5997. PhilKnight (talk) 03:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request, and an apology for my actions[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Pepperide (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

While this is no where near the amount of time I should wait for a WP:SO, I still want to appeal this block per WP:ROPE.

This is a sockpuppet of User:Nestofbirdnests. I know what I've is wrong. It's not within the spirits of Wikipedia, and it's immature as well. Sockpuppetry, hoaxing, harassment, cross-wiki abuse, etc, is wrong, for obvious reasons. I want to make positive contributions to Wikipedia. I go on it almost every single day, and I have been since 2020. I have made positive contributions in the past, and I want to continue doing so. If you're wondering why I even started vandalizing Wikipedia, it's mostly because I came across WP:LTA, and I started getting some ideas. It's been over a month of me making sockpuppet accounts, (some of which haven't been found like this one) and I want to stop doing that.

I cannot reiterate how much I want to contribute to Wikipedia. I am more than fine with a topic ban from all linguistics related articles, an interaction ban from User:Fdom5997, and maybe even a 1RR too. I apologize for all the things I've done to Wikipedia. You could bring this to the community if you'd like. I swear to never vandalize ever again.

As well as that, could you also unblock User:173.73.180.124? It might be asking too much, but since that's my home IP address, it'll make editing easier.

fyi: I've been globally locked on Nestofbirdnests, which is why I'm making an appeal here. I know I can directly appeal to stewards on that account, but to be frank, I prefer the username of this account.

Pepperide (talk) 00:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Of course not. Appeal through your original account or not at all. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:28, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pepperide (talk) 00:43, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]