User talk:Peterchiapperino

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Peterchiapperino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for MC Yogi. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Blue Rasberry (talk) 13:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the box to MC Yogi. Also thanks for the picture - you are attributed on the picture's page, and per policy I removed the attribution you put into the article. If you need anything then ask. Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox images[edit]

I don't want to in any way suggest your contribution of photographs is not appreciated, or to discourage you from making further contributions. However, several of the changes you made today, changing infobox photos, were not consistent with Wikipedia practices. Infobox photos are intended as the primary means of visual identification of article subjects, and photographs clearly and prominently depicting a subject's face are generally preferred. While an image like File:John Stamos by Peter Chiapperino.jpg may be an excellent choice for illustrating the section of the Stamos article dealing with his music-related activities, it is not an optimal choice for the infobox photo. If you'd like assistance selecting an appropriate location to place an image, I'd suggest either the article talk page or, more generally, at WP:Help desk. Thanks again for your contributions. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No prob Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, Im still learning this stuff. I've moved the photo down in the artilce. Peterchiapperino (talk) 02:10, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI on image captions[edit]

It usually isn't necessary to include attribution in image captions, which you seem to have done here, since a description and attribution exists at the image description page. Have a good day! — SamX‧☎‧✎‧S 19:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copy that S! I promise to get better at this!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christina Novelli (June 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Christina Novelli.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 06:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Peterchiapperino, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 06:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Christina Novelli was accepted[edit]

Christina Novelli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Test[edit]

Signature Photocyclone (talk) 01:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Concert Photography) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Concert Photography, Peterchiapperino!

Wikipedia editor Goalbox just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice!

To reply, leave a comment on Goalbox's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

User:Freakphotography[edit]

Are you aware that his userpage seems to impersonate you? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:37, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Anna Frodesiak. Seems as though User:Freakphotography copy and pasted my template. I am pretty sure he will change it to suit his needs. Good looking out! Mahalo for the heads up! Photocyclone (talk) 01:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to help, my friend. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jack Johnson (musician)[edit]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Jack Johnson 2014.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 01:08, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

G.B. Hajim moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for creating G.B. Hajim. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and References provided does not talk about the subject. Lacks significant coverage to establish notability. IMDB is not a reliable source, see WP:IMDB for details and a guide on reliable sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 15:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks user:Raydann! Im on it! Was literally citing some awards to establish notability when you edited the page. No worries. Photocyclone (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I pulled a couple of the sources out of Internet Archive. I also removed the IMDB link because WP:IMDB and you have another cited source where it is used anyway. Good to see you around and message anytime if I can support. Bluerasberry (talk) 22:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: G.B. Hajim has been accepted[edit]

G.B. Hajim, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bogger (talk) 21:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G.B. Hajim moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, G.B. Hajim, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:49, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

user:Onel5969, First thanks for the tireless effort you put into Wikipedia to make it a good home for encyclopedic content.

The article I wrote last weekend about GB Hajim was submitted through the Articles for Creation. The article cites multiple reliable sources, such as the university of Hawaii and Hawaii Tribune Herald. The subject meets WP:GNG due to the fact that the he produced and directed the first known film to be entirely in Hawaiian language.

A few days later it appeared to have moved from draft to start class. I have continued to edit the article on my free time. However I am unsure as to why one would move an article rated from draft, to start class back to draft again.

I want to contribute and would be wondering if you would offer any experience and advice for an amateur Wikipedian that wants to contribute quality content.

Thanks! Photocyclone (talk) 18:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You know, you're right. I've moved it back to mainspace. Sorry for the confusion. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thanks user:Onel5969, i went ahead and removed the template as well, however, your advice is always welcome. Photocyclone (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]