User talk:Piotrus/Archive 60
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | Archive 62 | → | Archive 65 |
Asking for help from Piotrus about an edit
Hello Piotrus -- I'm not sure if I will get through to you this way but I'll try. I am the retired faculty member for whom you added a photo above six years ago. I would like to make an addition to the Wikipedia page "Mathematical Sociology" but I am not sure how to do so. I've forgotten whatever I once knew in making an earlier edit on that page and I think the rules have tightened to not enable just anybody to make an edit of a page. One possibility is that I could ask you to copy and paste something I would post here on your own User talk location or maybe there is a simpler way? Any help much appreciated. (I'm refraining from using my name because I think everything is tightened up on Wikipedia and I don't want to violate any rule.) SeniorScribbler (talk) 21:47, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Piotr, Thanks for your reply. While I thought I might make some edits, I realize now that the article is far less informative than it should be. Also, I find it very difficult to navigate Wikipedia in the edit role as contrasted with the user-reader role.
Along with a former student I've produced a far more thorough encyclopedia treatment of the field with particular elaboration on recent research trends and contributions. You can take a look at this via Google search: Sociopedia Mathematical Sociology
What I thought might be best is the following very minor edit: In the Wikipedia article, insert the following at the end of the Present research section:
Present-day research trends and contributions are discussed in detail HERE.
HERE would be the URL link to the Sociopedia article, which, as you see, is freely accessible on the Internet.
It would be a struggle for me to make even this simple edit, I admit. Would you be willing to make this insertion in the article? SeniorScribbler (talk) 19:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks
I see what you mean about the prominence of Wikipedia on searches relating to the subject. I may ask my collaborator on that linked article if he would be willing to amplify the "recent research" section although I don't know if he has any experience with contributing to Wikipedia. Thanks for adding that link and best wishes to you in all your activities.SeniorScribbler (talk) 14:05, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hatnote at the Teahouse
I undid your hatnote at the Teahouse. The other redirects to that essay page seem somewhat unjustified to me, so the fact that WP:TEA does not go there is not important. We can talk about it if you think it is important. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 16:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Change of mind about math soc insert
Piotr, I changed my mind and created a moderately long addition to the article that tries to explain the continuity between the earlier developments in the field and later work. I thnk it might fit under Recent Research but am not sure. Also, I'm just not sure how to insert it. Should I let you see it first? And, if so, how do I actually do that? I wish this were email, I could just send it to you as an attachment!
I apologize for first sending this new message without a heading and without the marks at the end. Sorry! 24.101.111.14 (talk) 22:15, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Substantial edit created
Piotr -- I made a substantial edit and feel pretty good about it. If you get a chance take a look (no hurry). Thanks for nudging me into giving it a try! Tom — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.101.111.14 (talk) 20:27, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Maria and Bogdan Kalinowski
Hello! Your submission of Maria and Bogdan Kalinowski at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:06, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Response about blue etc
Thanks Piotr, but I don't understand your two concerns. First, when I look at the math soc page I see blue links, not red or any other color, so the page appears to be OK. Second, in regard to inline citations do you mean changing all the articles mentioned in the text (in the form "....") to footnotes? If I understand you, I need to find a help page "changing text citations into footnotes" ? or is it "changing in-text citations into inline citations" ? The terminology is new to me. I envision going through the entire page looking for "..." mentions of specific articles in journals and changing each into a footnote. Is that what you mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeniorScribbler (talk • contribs) 15:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Sorry
This edit was an accident of mine. I didn't mean to revert your edits. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 20:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Request for approval of the article
Pozwolę sobie napisać w języku polskim. W ramach projektów GLAM współpracuję z Instytutem Adama Mickiewicza z Warszawy. Pracownicy tej instytucji proszą o zatwierdzenie przygotowanego przez nich hasła w en wiki, które utknęło na etapie Draft:Polish Radio Experimental Studio (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Polish_Radio_Experimental_Studio). Zależy im, żeby nie czekać 5 tygodni na weryfikację. Najlepiej jakby artykuł pojawi się przed 13 lipca (startuje wtedy wystawa związana z przygotowanym artykułem). Czy byłaby możliwość, żebyś spojrzał na hasło i je zatwierdził, o ile jest zgodne z wymogami? Celstrzel (talk) 06:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:12, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
Did some work on the article
Sorry, just forgot to give a subject/headline so here is my new post again. SeniorScribbler (talk) 20:55, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Piotr -- I spent a good deal of time trying to be responsive to your latest comments. For instance, you will see many more references in which I replaced article titles by use of the template for citations. Earlier I had done some other work to disambiguate a number of things. I have to stop now because this work is exhausting for me. I'm not sure if I've met all your tough requirements but I did try to improve the article in respect to Wikipedia standards. SeniorScribbler (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
As requested, I've copyedited "Battle of Westerplatte". When time permits, please review the result.
The "Background" section speaks of 5 outposts; the "Prelude" section, of 6. Which is the correct number?
Thanks.
Nihil novi (talk) 21:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the International Sociological Association.gif
![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the International Sociological Association.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
DRN on AK
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Peacedove.svg/60px-Peacedove.svg.png)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Home Army. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!— Preceding unsigned comment added by François Robere (talk • contribs) 05:38, June 24, 2018 (UTC)
- A volunteer offered their help. I'm leaving it up to you on whether to take it or not. François Robere (talk) 15:32, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Piotr, HELP!
Piotr - this is SeniorScribbler again about the MathSoc page. I know you may not be available now but maybe you are. I've spent additional time since our last communication in which I've done a lot of work on editing. Today, Sunday 7-15, I spent hours -- really hours -- trying to recover from an "edit conflict." All my work appeared to be for nothing -- I mean all the work since I first contacted you about editing the article. After not finding a method of retrieving my edited page, I went through the laborious process of copying-pasting all my edit, major and minor, onto the editing page for the old version and then saving that. I then went through it to be sure that the page was back to my last work this afternoon before the conflict. But a few minutes later somebody named Chrissymad contacted me to say he/she had returned the page to the earlier version -- I mean before all my work since days and days ago! To be sure that person wrote that my edit was saved somewhere. The objection that this person had was about my edit not having a reliable source --- just after all this time I put in to produce reliable sources!! This will be the very last time I will do anything more on Wikipedia! All I ask of you now is to see if you can get Chrissymad to put back the page to the time of my last work, which was probably about 5pm here in Pittsburgh on 7-15. SeniorScribbler (talk) 21:47, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews
On 17 July 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1944 Report on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews accused US State Department officials of willfully obstructing attempts to rescue Holocaust refugees? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Report to the Secretary on the Acquiescence of This Government in the Murder of the Jews), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 01:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Feature Image for Kartik Aaryan
Hi, I recently edited the image on the page - Kartik Aryan, which was reverted by you for copyright violation. However, it's not really the case. Rohan Shreshta did a photoshoot with Kartik recently and the picture is from there. Please look at this for your reference -https://twitter.com/theaaryankartik/status/882225101827166209
Please suggest what necessary edit needs to be made on the uploaded file to notify that the image use is not copyright violation.
Thanks --B — Preceding unsigned comment added by Behanlife (talk • contribs) 06:51, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
RfA
"Why would they want to deal with the torrent of abuse known as RfA?"
It occurred to me recently that there may be a good reason for the torrent of abuse. Any admin is going to need to deal with arseholes; someone who can't, shouldn't have been made an admin. So part of the RfA process is to run a gauntlet of normally civil editors who are impersonating arseholes. Maproom (talk) 20:15, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Westerplatte
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Westerplatte you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:40, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Category:Censored media has been nominated for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Censored media, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. GZWDer (talk) 19:14, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Comment
I have added the following reply to the "Indonesia:talk:page -- "In addition, it would be useful to know who the users are at the Indonesian end -- whether they are Indonesians, or are foreign users who are living in or visiting Indonesia. It would even be interesting to know how many views are from Bali alone because many foreign visitors to Bali probably access Wikipedia while they are visiting. Pmccawley (talk) 22:11, 29 July 2018 (UTC) "
The Signpost: 31 July 2018
- From the editor: If only if
- Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality
- Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals
- Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose
- Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes
- Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else
- Technology report: New bots, new prefs
- Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons
- Humour: It's all the same
- Essay: Wikipedia does not need you
This Month in Education: July 2018
![Wikipedia Education globe](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/Wikipedia_Education_Globe_2.pdf/page1-150px-Wikipedia_Education_Globe_2.pdf.jpg)
Volume 4 | Issue 7 | July 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Your GA nomination of Battle of Westerplatte
The article Battle of Westerplatte you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Westerplatte for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Maria and Bogdan Kalinowski
On 4 August 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Maria and Bogdan Kalinowski, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Maria and Bogdan Kalinowski were recognized as the most avid filmgoers in Poland, having seen more than 13,000 movies together? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Maria and Bogdan Kalinowski. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Maria and Bogdan Kalinowski), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
Template:WPSOCCCER listed at Redirects for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WPSOCCCER. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WPSOCCCER redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jameboy (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Category:Polish resistance fighters of World War II has been nominated for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Polish resistance fighters of World War II, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Catrìona (talk) 20:09, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Waiting
Hi Piotrus -- Just to remind you: I left a message for you in mid July and am waiting for your reply to learn what you make of the loss of all my work in editing the Math Soc entry. SeniorScribbler (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thank you very much Piotrus for re-activating my edited Math Soc page. We'll see if there is some response from Chrissymad. SeniorScribbler (talk) 21:38, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Civil society organization listed at Redirects for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Civil society organization. Since you had some involvement with the Civil society organization redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 15:25, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 29
Books & Bytes
Issue 29, June – July 2018
- New partners
- Economic & Political Weekly–10 accounts
- Wikimania
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
Hindi, Italian and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of User:Piotrus/South Korean scandals for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether User:Piotrus/South Korean scandals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Piotrus/South Korean scandals (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the article. Nardog (talk) 03:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Political scandals in South Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Hyun-chul (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Gorals and Kaszubs
Hello, I really don't understand why you reverted the section title for 'minorities' which you yourself proposed, as a compromise measure. Also, I don't understand why you keep highlighting the narrative that Gorals and Kaszubs are non-Polish, especially since they themselves identify as both Kaszub/Polish and Goral/Polish, perfect example of this is the 2011 census where a near total majority listed two ethnicities together, so they identify with the Polish nation, as opposed to German or Ukrainian minorities which did not. --E-960 (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Schleswig Holstein ostrzeliwuje Westerplatte 39 09 01 b.jpg listed for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Schleswig Holstein ostrzeliwuje Westerplatte 39 09 01 b.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Parsecboy (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Category:Science fiction in Poland has been nominated for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Science fiction in Poland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Hanbo scandal
Hello! Your submission of Hanbo scandal at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:25, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2018
- From the editor: Today's young adults don't know a world without Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flying high; low practice from Wikipedia 'cleansing' agency; where do our donations go? RfA sees a new trend
- In the media: Quicksilver AI writes articles
- Discussion report: Drafting an interface administrator policy
- Featured content: Featured content selected by the community
- Special report: Wikimania 2018
- Traffic report: Aretha dies – getting just 2,000 short of 5 million hits
- Technology report: Technical enhancements and a request to prioritize upcoming work
- Recent research: Wehrmacht on Wikipedia, neural networks writing biographies
- Humour: Signpost editor censors herself
- From the archives: Playing with Wikipedia words
DYK Visakha
Hello Piotrus, would you please take a look at the new ALT for this? [1] Wikiman5676 (talk) 02:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 12
This month: WikiProject X: The resumption
Work has resumed on WikiProject X and CollaborationKit, backed by a successfully funded Project Grant. For more information on the current status and planned work, please see this month's issue of the newsletter!
-— Isarra ༆ 22:24, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Bombing of Wieluń
On 1 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bombing of Wieluń, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Wieluń, Poland, became the first city to sustain major damage and casualties from German bombing (pictured) in World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bombing of Wieluń. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bombing of Wieluń), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
WikiCup 2018 September newsletter
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:
Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
- Other contestants who qualified for the final round were
Nova Crystallis,
Iazyges,
SounderBruce,
Kosack and
Ceranthor.
During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
This Month in Education: August 2018
![Wikipedia Education globe](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/Wikipedia_Education_Globe_2.pdf/page1-150px-Wikipedia_Education_Globe_2.pdf.jpg)
Volume 4 | Issue 8 | August 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
Replying about the proposed deletion of "Elastoplast"
Hi. I have no particular worries about the "Elastoplast" article being deleted. I believe I created the article back in 2004 because there was a thing on Wikipedia in those days whereby people would request articles on various topics and then editors who were at a bit of a loose end could create stubs or full articles to fulfill the request. I created a whole bunch of these kind of articles just because they were on the list of requests. Since the Elastoplast article is fairly short I would suggest merging it with a bunch of similar articles on notable products or iconic brand names like Marmite or Doc Martens. Some of the brands could have a brief paragraph while others might have a link to a longer article. Cheers. wayland (talk) 14:15, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Westerplatte
The article Battle of Westerplatte you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Westerplatte for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:02, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Haywards Heath Building Society
I've de-prodded the article and added more info & sources. Even as it stood the title would have merited a redirect to its successor rather than deletion. Cabayi (talk) 12:35, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Tee-Com Electronics disputed
I reject the proposed deletion of Tee-Comm Electronics because this is a company that is the heritage of the first direct digital to home satellite TV service. The topic should not be disregarded due to some arbitrary "notability" requirement. KJRehberg (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Battle of Westerplatte
On 7 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Westerplatte, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the surrender of the Polish garrison at the Battle of Westerplatte on 7 September 1939 ended what has been described as the opening battle of World War II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Battle of Westerplatte. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Battle of Westerplatte), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Your proposed deletion of La New Corporation
La New Corporation is a notable company in Taiwan and became particularly notable after its purchase of a professional baseball team, now called the Lamigo Monkeys. Simply from association with Lamigo Monkeys should provide sufficient reliable citations for the corporation. Coo000ookie (talk) 01:18, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of RadioBOSS for deletion
The software is very well known in its niche, it has lots of references here and there. There are categories in Wikipedia that lists such software: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Internet_radio_software or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Radio_technology for instance. Some articles about other software do not have any external links and the only source is their own web site. There are also lots of free software that is not widely known or used and with no external sources. And this is OK and not deleted for years. So why RadioBOSS is not allowed? Is it personal? Fmcoder (talk) 12:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Furgate
Hello! Your submission of Furgate at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Hanbo scandal
On 13 September 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hanbo scandal, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Hanbo scandal, one of South Korea's largest corruption cases, involved presidential aides, a former minister, and top banking executives? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hanbo scandal. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hanbo scandal), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia Student Training
Hello Prof. Piotrus, My name is Cindy Paskalina Kweesar, one of the student from Sociology of Globalization. I want to inform you that I have completed wikipedia training for students. Thank you!--Cindypaskalina (talk) 01:42, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Finished the training
Hello Mr. Konieczny, I finished the training. Kindley regards --CoElArnold (talk) 07:12, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Student Training Modules
Hello, professor! I've completed all the training on Wikipedia editing. It was very helpful. Thank you.--Dhksml1 (talk) 06:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of OpenBroadcaster
Hello. Thanks for the note. This article meets criteria A and B because I've tried to keep the wikipedia article more editorial and not including extra fluff and puffery. This wikipedia page makes it easy for like minded rural indigenous community radio and TV stations to learn about DIY open source options available for broadcast. The timeline table is not meant to represent a change log and only highlight significant milestones. With over 25 years in telecom industry this project is very publicly notable in reliable sources including; independent media sources in Canada (CBC and Globe and Mail), US and Internationally. You can also see some of our contributions to community radio on the Canadian Government's CRTC site (National Telecommunications Regulator) highlighting creating an open source EAS (emergency alerting) to assist communities to be safer in times of distress, forest fires, floods, etc. I have also created, shared and edited other wikipedia articles. Perhaps on the notability aspect you have me confused with another ambiguous sounding open broadcast system that is not truly notable?
Added some other independent reviews and mentions about our systems from independent sources. You bring up a good point about secondary references. I do have many testimonials that were sent in, but what is missing is a code review or certification from a regulatory body as an example. Good idea. Will be exploring this further at the many technical broadcast conferences I present\share, perhaps finding a knowledgeable competitor (peer) to review. I've kept out media releases, directory listings and kept it to notable links to pages other than what I control. Also refreshed about guidelines and don't use Wikipedia as a project wiki, we have separate sites for that kind of information.
Rob RadioRobYukon (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Rob Hopkins RadioRobYukon (talk) 19:30, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
I have finished Wikipedia:Training/For students
Hello, professor.
I am , enrolled in 'Globalization' class
https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/training/students — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:|User:]] ([[User talk:#top|talk]] • contribs) 22:06, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Student Training Modules
Hello Prof. Piotrus, My name is Jiyeon Han in the class of 'Sociology of Globalization'. I have completed wikipedia training for students. Thanks. --Jiyeon victoria (talk) 02:40, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Student Training
Hello Prof. Piotrus, My name is TaehaP in the class of 'Sociology of Globalization'. I have completed wikipedia training for students. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by TaehaP (talk • contribs) 09:56, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
An Inquiry about Technical Maintenance
Hello Prof. Piotrus,
I' m not sure if there are some changes when I tried to edit minutes ago. I mean, Wikipedia is going to make some Technical Maintenance from Wednesday 12 September 2018 to Wednesday 10 October 2018. Would you mind explaining that a little more by facing the situation, please? It is said that one will not be able to edit for up to an hour, but if we edit in the sandbox, will them be saved? I' m fairly certain someone had seen the Tech/Server switch 2018 before, yet I paste the link so you can also click here: [2] Besides, I'm wondering meta.wikipedia is an External link or Internal link?
and I'm leaving a message:)
Best regards, --Anqing Hu (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for addressing my question, hope to see you in class. I've finished the tutorials for students and tried to edit something on my user page, that's really helpful.
- --Anqing Hu (talk) 06:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Student Training
Zhangpeiyao (talk) 10:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Hello professor.My name is Zhang Peiyao,I am the student of 'Sociology of Globalization'.I have already finished the student training, it's very helpful to me.Thank you!--Zhangpeiyao (talk) 10:34, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Zhang peiyao
Wikipedia Student Training
Hello prof. Piotrus, I'm Kiara Juliane Annisa from the Sociology of Globalization class. I want to inform you that I have finished the Wikipedia training for students. It's really helpful, thank you very much.--Kiara Juliane (talk) 12:39, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Community Health Metrics Kit consultation
The Community Health Metrics Kit is a new project to measure more aspects of our communities. If you are interested in metrics, statistics, and measurement of editing and contributing, please join us on Meta to discuss how and what the new project should measure! Please share this with anyone else you think may be interested in this work. This message is also available in other languages. For the Community health initiative, Cheers, SPoore (WMF), Trust & Safety, Community health initiative (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia Student Training
Hello, my name is Angela Wibowo from Sociology of globalization class. I have finished my student training for wikipedia. Thankyou. --Angelaw2308 (talk) 14:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia Student Training
Hello Professor. my name is Jong Hoon Park and I finish the article on Wikipedia: Training / For students.Thank you. --JongHN (talk) 07:50, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia Student Training
Hello Prof. Piotrus, my name is Yeqing from Sociology of Globalization class. I have finished my student training for wikipedia. Thank you --Yeqing2015 (talk) 09:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Anti-Polish Khmelnytsky Uprising
See Talk:Szlachta#Malorossian_szlachta_(Little_Russia_Szlachta)
Would like to revert your latest edit to Szlachta for reasons of accuracy, but will not do so as a courtesy. As it stands now, another editor agrees with me ("Anti-Polish Khmelnytsky Uprising" is OK, got Third Opinion), and you seem to agree with editor opposing me, so it's a stalemate (Two editors "Anti-Polish" OK, two editors "Anti-Polish" not OK). Might also be much ado about nothing, but uneasy with source using the specific words "anti-Polish" and "anti-noble" being deleted for your (presuming) reasons of brevity? Thanks. - Exxess (talk) 18:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Szlachta article lead now very tight. Thanks for your input. - Exxess (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Nobility Through Mother - Doubtful
Szlachta article - seems to be a few vestiges of wishful thinking there. Myself, reluctant to delete, as challenging seems to be more informative for all...
Surgical knife might need application here (building more avenues to prestige, rather than focusing on the narrow path of precision {providing sourced material}):
Discussion here:
Talk:Szlachta/Archive 1#Nobility_Through_Mother_-_Doubtful - Exxess (talk) 18:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Piotrus, there has been a response to your review of this nomination; please stop by at your earliest convenience. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:22, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Szlachta
To be honest, I was under the impression that the remaining editor on that page was just yelling into the void and had stopped trying to follow the conversation thread days ago. Cheers, signed, Rosguill talk 18:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Polish epigram
I saw you had an old interest in the Latin epigram about the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. I created a Wikidata item Heaven for the nobles, Purgatory for the townspeople, Hell for the peasants, and Paradise for the Jews (Q56697547) bringing together the research I could find; it does indeed look like it was first published in Italy.--Pharos (talk) 00:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Upon further research, the earliest version seems to be by Juraj Križanić. The proverb is discussed at Golden Liberty#Assessment and misattributed to a 20th century author.--Pharos (talk) 02:05, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Started a stub here: Heaven for the nobles, Hell for the peasants, and Paradise for the Jews.--Pharos (talk) 05:40, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia Student Training
Hello, professor. I am Siyoung In from your Sociology of Globalization class. I finished my Wikipedia Student Training. Thank you. --05:54, 26 September 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyoung In (talk • contribs)
Done training for student!
Hello professor, I'm Moon Jungun for Sociology of Globalization.
Please check my assignment! See you in class.
Evelyn (talk) 14:08, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 October 2018
- From the editor: Is this the new normal?
- News and notes: European copyright law moves forward
- In the media: Knowledge under fire
- Discussion report: Interface Admin policy proposal, part 2
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbcom
- Technology report: Paying attention to your mobile
- Gallery: A pat on the back
- Recent research: How talk page use has changed since 2005; censorship shocks lead to centralization; is vandalism caused by workplace boredom?
- Humour: Signpost Crossword Puzzle
- Essay: Expressing thanks
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
tag from Altacast, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}}
back to the file. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! ... not comfortable as this one going as a PROD ... (but it might take a lot of effort to rescue but it is possibly rescueable) ... and you also seem hesitant yourself. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:00, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Furgate
On 4 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Furgate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Furgate scandal in the late 1990s, described as one of the largest in South Korea, involved influence peddling through the giving of luxury items? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Furgate. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Furgate), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
The change of the topic of wikipedia Assignment for Sociology of Globalization
--Zhangpeiyao (talk) 12:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)Good evening Sir,
I’m Zhang Peiyao the student of Hanyang University ERICA Campus, from Sociology of Globalization Class. I want to ask one thing. Our group (Angela and I), want to change the topic, from Economic Benefits, to the kind of Chinese Noodle, it is called Longxumian (Dragon Whiskers Noodle), and it is still not publish in both Country of Wikipedia (Chinese and English), and after we're looking for our source, we found that the topic of economic benefit is more difficult for us than Longxumian, so we want to ask your acceptance for the change of our topic. Thankyou so much for your help in advance. Have a mice day.
Topic change
--Zhangpeiyao (talk) 04:48, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Good morning sir.I’m Zhang Peiyao the student of Hanyang University ERICA Campus, from Sociology of Globalization Class.I have got your point about over topic.I'll explain our topic more to you on Monday.As the same time, we'll look for other topics that are more appropriate.Thanks for your help very much.Have a nice day!
The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Blue Army
There is a discussion on the neutral point of view noticeboard [3] and article talk page [4] posted regarding the Blue Army and text neutrality — in reference to undue weight (depth of detail, quantity of text). Perhaps it might be a good option to get editors familiar with the topic to voice their recommendations, to see how the text on anti-Jewish violence can be trimmed proper and correct way, as it is the longest by far, in proportion to the rest of the article. --E-960 (talk) 13:21, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
This Month in Education: September 2018
![Wikipedia Education globe](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/Wikipedia_Education_Globe_2.pdf/page1-150px-Wikipedia_Education_Globe_2.pdf.jpg)
Volume 4 | Issue 9 | September 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
DYK nomination of The Nature of Prejudice
Hello! Your submission of The Nature of Prejudice at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Drmies (talk) 21:58, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Puzzled at the notability template you added on SHOUTcast
The article already provides multiple news references. The notability template's news books and scholar links turn up thousands more references, including many from major news sources that could trivially be added. What more would be required to establish notability? It's obviously received less coverage in the past decade due to the rise of enormously successful services like Pandora or Spotify, but for a while during the '00s, along with Live365, it was probably one the two most widely noted conduits for streaming audio. (This isn't formal notability proof itself, but as an informal indication of its recognition, it was actually the first to even get mentioned on the Internet Radio article, all the way back in 2002.) It might be helpful to clarify, with an entry on the article's discussion page, more precisely what you're looking for. —Undomelin (talk) 22:44, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ethnocultural politics in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Religious group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Email has been hacked
My email for wikipedia has been hacked and I can't access it anymore.If you receive any messages they are not from me.--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 23:26, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Large number of PRODs circa 22 October 2018
I observe you have WP:PROD at least 32 articles on 22 October 2018 in the software/computing without as far as I can tell gaining consensus with the associated WikiProjects first. This level rate PRODing will in my opinion be disruptive. Per WP:PRODNOM the nominator is expected to consider possible merges first, and I see some as obvious that you have not done. I am on the verge of reporting this to ANI due to the sheer unmanagability of reviewing this number of PRODs effectively; though at more glance most are uncontroversial deletes. In at least case issues in the article seem only to be templated at the same day as the PROD. At a rough glance I will be dePRODing at least 2 one of which may be a simple merge and one of which is more complex. I will be using Template:Old prod full on the talk page and not contacting you directly if I deprod which gives required reasoning. Thankyou Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:53, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding Possible excessive number of PROD nominations. The thread is Possibly excessive number of PROD nominations by a user on 22 October 2018. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:12, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 30
Books & Bytes
Issue 30, August – Septmeber 2018
- Library Card translation
- Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref spreads to the Southern Hemisphere and beyond
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available in meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of The Hexer (film)
Hello! Your submission of The Hexer (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:12, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Chmielnicki ukraine banknote 5 new.gif
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:Chmielnicki ukraine banknote 5 new.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 October 2018
- From the editors: The Signpost is still afloat, just barely
- News and notes: WMF gets a million bucks
- In the media: Bans, celebs, and bias
- Discussion report: Mediation Committee and proposed deletion reform
- Traffic report: Unsurprisingly, sport leads the field – or the ring
- Technology report: Bots galore!
- Special report: NPP needs you
- Special report 2: Now Wikidata is six
- In focus: Alexa
- Gallery: Out of this world!
- Recent research: Wikimedia Commons worth $28.9 billion
- Humour: Talk page humour
- Opinion: Strickland incident
- From the archives: The Gardner Interview
DYK for The Hexer
On 31 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Hexer, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Hexer, the first attempt to portray The Witcher universe in film, was "crushed by the reviewers and laughed out by fans", and has since been described as "the film we all want to forget"? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Hexer), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Editing News #2—2018
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter • Subscription list on the English Wikipedia
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/12/VisualEditor-logo.svg/200px-VisualEditor-logo.svg.png)
Did you know?
Did you know that you can use the visual editor on a mobile device?
![Screenshot showing the location of the pencil icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/Mobile_editing_watchlist_star_editing_pencil.png/250px-Mobile_editing_watchlist_star_editing_pencil.png)
Tap on the pencil icon to start editing. The page will probably open in the wikitext editor.
You will see another pencil icon in the toolbar. Tap on that pencil icon to the switch between visual editing and wikitext editing.
![Toolbar with menu opened](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Visual_editing_mobile_switch_wikitext.png/250px-Visual_editing_mobile_switch_wikitext.png)
Remember to publish your changes when you're done.
You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.
Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has wrapped up most of their work on the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual diff tool. The team has begun investigating the needs of editors who use mobile devices. Their work board is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are fixing bugs and improving mobile editing.
Recent changes
- The Editing team has published an initial report about mobile editing.
- The Editing team has begun a design study of visual editing on the mobile website. New editors have trouble doing basic tasks on a smartphone, such as adding links to Wikipedia articles. You can read the report.
- The Reading team is working on a separate mobile-based contributions project.
- The 2006 wikitext editor is no longer supported. If you used that toolbar, then you will no longer see any toolbar. You may choose another editing tool in your editing preferences, local gadgets, or beta features.
- The Editing team described the history and status of VisualEditor in this recorded public presentation (starting at 29 minutes, 30 seconds).
- The Language team released a new version of Content Translation (CX2) last month, on International Translation Day. It integrates the visual editor to support templates, tables, and images. It also produces better wikitext when the translated article is published. [5]
Let's work together
- The Editing team wants to improve visual editing on the mobile website. Please read their ideas and tell the team what you think would help editors who use the mobile site.
- The Community Wishlist Survey begins next week.
- If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly. We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation. Thank you!
— Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Polish help requested at WP:CFD
Hello, you created Category:Wrocław University of Technology, which I've requested be renamed to Category:Wrocław University of Science and Technology. Would you mind chiming in at the CFD, particularly if someone asks a question related to the translation of the original name? Thank you. Nyttend (talk) 15:54, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Lü Ban (director)
Hello! Your submission of Lü Ban (director) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for your earlier message concerning the Szlachta. Unfortunately, a mass of my edits got reversed today by an administrator. Can the situation be remedied? Thank you for your time. --Po Mieczu (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
This Month in Education: November 2018
![Wikipedia Education globe](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/Wikipedia_Education_Globe_2.pdf/page1-150px-Wikipedia_Education_Globe_2.pdf.jpg)
Volume 4 | Issue 10 | October 2018
This monthly newsletter showcases the Wikipedia Education Program. It focuses on sharing: your ideas, stories, success and challenges. You can see past editions here. You can also volunteer to help publish the newsletter. Join the team! Finally, don't forget to subscribe!
The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
deletion discussions
Thanks for your decisive word on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ebrahim_Bagheri. Would you mind to also have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falcon (programming language). Cheers, Oisguad (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Using talk pages
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Sci-Hub are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 08:35, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Piotrus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Article about ArbCom
Could you either email me a copy of this article you wrote which you mentioned in the ArbCom candidate questions or tell me where I can get a copy without having to sign up for some service? --David Tornheim (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- [6] I have responded to your question. Mkdw talk 04:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
Deprod of UnCommon Web
I removed prod, because the article was already proded and deproded in May 2018 (Old Prod Full template was then added to the article talk page). Pavlor (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Shmuel Krakowski
On 21 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shmuel Krakowski, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that before becoming a Yad Vashem historian, Shmuel Krakowski worked for Polish communist intelligence and security organizations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shmuel Krakowski. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Shmuel Krakowski), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Your "Decision Making" paper
Hi. I am very good at finding things with Google, and I couldn't find the paper. Google Scholar gave me only the journal link when I searched on the full title. I had high hopes for the Zenodo link, but the pdf provided is only the abstract and keywords. ResearchGate does not provide downloads. It is a networking site. It asks you to Quickly share your contact details so the authors can provide the full-text.
I don't want to give authors my email address so I never use it. (Normally one can register at a site and only the site knows your email address.) I could not find a fourth outlet. SciHub does not turn up on my search. Please send a copy to DGG and apologize. StarryGrandma (talk) 14:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- I have read it (thankful I still have access!), but a major limitation would be data is limited to 2009. I would consider that period to be a rather turbulent one, and a lot has developed/changed since 2009. Quite a bit of data can still be derived from the public side though (e.g. RFAR, case pages, motions). But yes time constrains is still a major issue today and this extends to the activity levels of the community generally today, but I think that's the nature of a volunteer project. - Mailer Diablo 19:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- @StarryGrandma: While Zenodo does, indeed, seem to provide only the abstract, a full version is available through Sci Hub and
academia.edu. While both of those don't seem to come up much on Google, I withdraw my criticism that the paper is easily google'able (I was somewhat mislead by customized Google search results) but I have nothing to apologize for. Knowing about Sci-Hub and academia.edu is part of being digitally literate in academia, and DGG is part of that community, he should've checked either of those - in particular Sci Hub is very easy to use, and you can get my paper from it in <1m. Since Wikipedia system does not allow for sending of attachment, it's not like I can send the paper to anyone who doesn't email me first, so there's not much I can do. PS. I don't have a ReasearchGate account so I can's speak of whether that portal can provide access to my paper or not. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)- Granted, it's nothing to apologise for, but it would be vastly better if you deposited the paper as you already did for most of yours. Do you still have your preprint? Does SAGE allow you to download the post-print, as some publishers do for a couple years? (This information could be useful for the Open Access Button manual for librarians on depositing.) Nemo 11:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Your paper
Hi, Piotrus - I found your paper quickly at sci-hub by entering the doi url located in the header of the article at Sage. I just finished reading it. Based on my experiences as an editor, I think you nailed it - thank you, job well done! Allegiance, dependence, the alpha - beta personalities - the dangers of group think and raw democracy - yep, it’s all right there. If you haven’t seen my primary question to the arbs, I’ll summarize by saying it inadvertently supports your conclusion. Kelapstick’s initial response to that question gave me pause...and I’m glad he came back to explain after I responded to it. I hope editors are paying attention and will take your conclusion to heart, particularly the following: A practical recommendation for Wikipedia in particular, and for other communities with collegiate courts in general, is that when electing members to their dispute resolu- tion bodies, those communities would do well to pay attention to how much time the prospective future judges can devote to this volunteering task. Happy voting! Atsme✍🏻📧 12:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC) "@Atsme: Indeed. Perhaps I should've posted about this in the form of a candidate guide or such, perhaps I should do it next election - but yes, bottom line is, it is pointless to elect Arbitrators who won't have time to be active. Obvious, yet each year we get several that find they cannot dedicate sufficient time to this to be of much use to the community. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- I still have not been able to access your paper without going through more complicated routes than ought to be necessary, please email it to me. When Iwas working for money as a librarian I would go through any possible route to help them getthings, but I'm a volunteer now, and I read what I can immediately find. DGG ( talk ) 02:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @DGG: I don't know if I still have your email. Why not use Sci Hub like everyone else? It takes 30 seconds to find my paper there and download it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Be careful, you might be branded "a vocal proponent of Sci-Hub" and ostracised! Nemo 10:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Nemo bis: Ha. One would think that people involved in FOSS/FC movements would be more understanding of guerilla open access.... (wow, we don't have En Wiki entry for de:Guerilla Open Access Manifest yet?). But then one needs to remember that Wikipedians also suffer from meta:copyright paranoia view and that Wikipedia is more holy than the Pope when it comes to enforcing some aspects of copyright that nobody cares about. Shrug. I stand by what I said. As an academic who has to publish in close access for my career, I consider the closed access system a parasitic exploitation of my work, and each and every single published academic I talked to shares this sentiment, through I admit it may be generational (although many of my colleagues are in their 50s and 60s). And since AFAIK Sci-Hub is a non-profit volunteer project, I can't imagine any sensible criticism of it outside of the fat profiteers in the publishing, their shills, and assorted useful fools. On the plank with all that ilk, I say. Yarr. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- There is some discussion of it in Aaron Swartz, although it's hard to tell how proper it is and how much there should be. Knowing such context would be useful (especially when one talks about USA laws), but guerilla OA is most definitely not our job as Wikimedia or Wikipedia, so I can understand some ignorance about it. What puzzles me is the blindness to duties which fall squarely in our remit, such as ensuring verifiability and guiding users towards existing legal avenues to access documents. Old-school copyright paranoia at least serves a purpose, namely to teach how bad current copyright laws are and how important it is to use free licenses; it's very different to just go around screaming that death is imminent and nothing will save us so we should just cut our throats and hope for heaven. Nemo 16:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @Nemo bis: Ha. One would think that people involved in FOSS/FC movements would be more understanding of guerilla open access.... (wow, we don't have En Wiki entry for de:Guerilla Open Access Manifest yet?). But then one needs to remember that Wikipedians also suffer from meta:copyright paranoia view and that Wikipedia is more holy than the Pope when it comes to enforcing some aspects of copyright that nobody cares about. Shrug. I stand by what I said. As an academic who has to publish in close access for my career, I consider the closed access system a parasitic exploitation of my work, and each and every single published academic I talked to shares this sentiment, through I admit it may be generational (although many of my colleagues are in their 50s and 60s). And since AFAIK Sci-Hub is a non-profit volunteer project, I can't imagine any sensible criticism of it outside of the fat profiteers in the publishing, their shills, and assorted useful fools. On the plank with all that ilk, I say. Yarr. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- Be careful, you might be branded "a vocal proponent of Sci-Hub" and ostracised! Nemo 10:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- @DGG: I don't know if I still have your email. Why not use Sci Hub like everyone else? It takes 30 seconds to find my paper there and download it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:36, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
- I still have not been able to access your paper without going through more complicated routes than ought to be necessary, please email it to me. When Iwas working for money as a librarian I would go through any possible route to help them getthings, but I'm a volunteer now, and I read what I can immediately find. DGG ( talk ) 02:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Removed PROD, see talk page. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 23:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Ethnographic group
On 26 November 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ethnographic group, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the concept of an ethnographic group is more commonly found in Soviet and post-Soviet, rather than Western, scholarly works? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ethnographic group. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ethnographic group), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
"Tim White-Sobieski" is a valid article and must not be deleted
All current editors at Wikipedia are quite new and recent arrivals. We are not sure of their background in education, languages, linguistics, architecture, arts, etc. Tim White-Sobieski is an artist who has proven his talent through many exhibitions and collaborations (i.e. Louis Vuitton's Bernard Arnault Collection, New York City's Westwood Gallery etc.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Butterbeanne (talk • contribs) 00:57, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Dear Professor
Choi Pu Reum (talk) 04:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)Hello. My name is Choi pureum. I am the student in the class of 'globalization'. My wikipedia team decided to have a 'wikipedia' consultation for professor on Monday with sangwoo, jonghoon. But I always have part-time job after 18:00 on Mondays and Wednesdays. So I wonder if only two of our team can consult with the professor, or whether I can be consulted individually. Have good day professor. thank you Choi Pu Reum (talk) 04:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
This Month in Education: November 2018
The Signpost: 1 December 2018
- From the editor: Time for a truce
- Special report: The Christmas wishlist
- Discussion report: Farewell, Mediation Committee
- Arbitration report: A long break ends
- Traffic report: Queen reigns for four weeks straight
- Gallery: Intersections
- From the archives: Ars longa, vita brevis
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Dominik Dziewanowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NOTABLE
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerus (talk) 17:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Dominik Dziewanowski for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dominik Dziewanowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominik Dziewanowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Smerus (talk) 18:26, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
File:Julian Aleksandrowicz.jpg listed for discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/30px-Information.svg.png)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Julian Aleksandrowicz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DBigXrayᗙ 12:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Crealogix
Hi Piotrus,
the article was updated now again. What do you say. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wutalhonky (talk • contribs) 08:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Problem pewien. Wyszukiwarka grobow (pierwszy przypis) trzeba wpisac Teresa Adamczewska. Na pl-Wiki zrobiono jakis dodatek do przypisu, ale na en-Wiki nie widze sposobu. Czy, jako doswiadczenszy "tubylec", mozesz cos poradzic? 109.233.47.132 (talk) 07:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
- Drogi anonie, kod na en wiki jest pod tym wzgledem identyczny jak kod na pl wiki. Dodalem przypis do draftu, wystarczy przetlumaczyc. Akurat bardzo sie spiesze wiec wybacz ze nie zrobilem tego. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:25, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Lü Ban
On 10 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lü Ban, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chinese film director Lü Ban was banned from film-making for life for his satirical comedies, the last of which, also banned, discussed the topic of film censorship? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lü Ban), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
DYK for The Unfinished Comedy
On 10 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Unfinished Comedy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chinese film director Lü Ban was banned from film-making for life for his satirical comedies, the last of which, also banned, discussed the topic of film censorship? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Unfinished Comedy), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
DYK for The Nature of Prejudice
Hello! Your submission of The Nature of Prejudice at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! La comadreja formerly AFriedman RESEARCH (talk) 04:04, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
PROD Deaf Side Story
I noticed you have done some work on Deaf Side Story. Just to let you know, I have proposed it for deletion.CircleGirl (talk) 18:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vera Salvequart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kapo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 13
This month: A general update.
The current status of the project is as follows:
- Progress of the project has been generally delayed since September due to development issues (more bitrot than expected, some of the code just being genuinely confusing, etc) and personal injury (I suffered a concussion in October and was out of commission for almost two months as a result).
- I currently expect to be putting out a proper call for CollaborationKit pilots in January/February, with estimated deployment in February/March if things don't go horribly wrong (they will, though, don't worry). As a part of that, I will properly update the page and send out announcement and reach out to all projects already signed up as pilots for WikiProject X in general, at which point those (still) interested can volunteer specifically to test the CollaborationKit extension.
- Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Pilots was originally created for the first WikiProject X prototype, and given this is where the project has since gone, it's only logical to continue to use it. While I haven't yet updated the page to properly reflect this:
- If you want to add your project to this page now, feel free. Just bear in mind that more information what to actually expect will be added later/included in the announcement, because by then I will have a much better idea myself.
- Until then, you can find me in my corner working on making the CollaborationKit code do what we want and not just what we told it, per the workboard.
Until next time,
-— Isarra ༆ 22:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
We finish wikipedia project.
Hi, professor. Our team finish wikipedia project. Please, confirm our project. Thank you!! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gochang,_Hwasun_and_Ganghwa_Dolmen_Sites https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EA%B3%A0%EC%B0%BD_%ED%99%94%EC%88%9C_%EA%B0%95%ED%99%94_%EA%B3%A0%EC%9D%B8%EB%8F%8C_%EC%9C%A0%EC%A0%81 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onggi https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%98%B9%EA%B8%B0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choi Pu Reum (talk • contribs) 10:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 31
Books & Bytes
Issue 31, October – Novemeber 2018
- OAWiki
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Read the full newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
![]() |
Best wishes for this holiday season! Thank you for your Wiki contributions in 2018. May 2019 be prosperous and joyful. --K.e.coffman (talk) 22:36, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Noël ~ καλά Χριστούγεννα ~ З Калядамі ~ חנוכה שמח ~ Gott nytt år! |
Merry Christmas!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f9/Wikisanta.jpg/80px-Wikisanta.jpg)
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings". :) BOZ (talk) 15:44, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Please check the assignment
Dear professor Piot. This is HanBin Bae and MinSeung Sung. We finished our Wiki project.
Eng. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottogi
Kor. https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EA%B3%BC%EC%9D%BC%EC%86%8C%EC%A3%BC
Merry Christmas!--Dhksml1 (talk) 06:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2018
- From the editors: Where to draw the line in reporting?
- News and notes: Some wishes do come true
- In the media: Political hijinks
- Discussion report: A new record low for RfA
- WikiProject report: Articlegenesis
- Arbitration report: Year ends with one active case
- Traffic report: Queen dethroned by U.S. presidents
- Gallery: Sun and Moon, water and stone
- Blog: News from the WMF
- Humour: I believe in Bigfoot
- Essay: Requests for medication
- From the archives: Compromised admin accounts – again
Another student?
Let's read a book book is up for deletion. Based on the article creator's editing history, including editing sandbox drafts in the userspace of one of your declared students, I thought there might be a connection to your course, and that you'd want to know about it if you didn't know already. Bakazaka (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Genealogy - newsletter No.6
Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)
![]() Participation: This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise. (To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below) Now 100 supportersAt 3 December 2018, the list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project, reached 100! A demo wiki is up and running!You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records. And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!
Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator Dan Koehl. To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery |
Acte Préalable - notable?
I recently added the Notability tag to Acte_Préalable. I noticed that you'd also previously added it, but removed it again - May I ask why you reconsidered? Happypoems (talk) 20:51, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Please check
Hello, professor. This is Jong Hoon Park. I've edited two articles about globalization. One was to translate and add to the content of APEC. The other is a translation of the globalization articles of the football transfer market and a new. I hope my grades will improve. Thank you. I'll add the link below.
--JongHN (talk) 11:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!
Hello and Happy New Year!
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Quick question about butter lambs
Hello! A few years ago you commented on the talk page of the Butter Lamb page, mentioning that you've seen more Lambs made out of chocolate or sugar. My question is, do you eat the chocolate or sugar lambs? And also, do you know if the lambs would be eaten if they were made out of butter?
Thank you! BookManiac42 (talk) 00:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
You too deserve a gong this New Year!
Best wishes and wszystkiego najlepszego z Londynu! Po Mieczu (talk) 13:33, 4 January 2019 (UTC) |
Hello, Piotrus. I was reading the above article, and found, in the Bibliography section, the following entry:
Hetman Stanisław Koniecpolski ok. 1591-1646 [emphasis added]
I am wondering whether you, as the person who started the article, intended for "ok." to be part of that entry. You can let me know if it's intentional, and you may feel free to remove it if it's a mistake. Thanks.--Quisqualis (talk) 08:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Piotrus. I encountered the name of a Polish town on the (then) south-eastern Polish border in the above article. The mention of the town was introduced by you in edit #501628343:
For the next several years he would serve on the always-virulent south-eastern border, where he made his home in Illńce.[1][2]
This town "Illńce" does not exist. Either "Illńce" is not the correct spelling of its name, or "Illńce" was destroyed or demolished, or "Illńce" has been renamed. As you are a Pole, and a person who may have access to the source books by Nagielski and Podhorodecki, it is my hope that you can clear up my confusion over this town's name. Apparently, it is prominent enough that you tried to make a Wikilink for it in your edit. Thank you in advance for any help you may be able to provide.--Quisqualis (talk) 09:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Politeja academic journal
Hello Piotruś and Happy New Year! I just wanted to let you know that the Jagiellonian University's journal, Politeja, is lined up for speedy deletion. It only has an entry to distinguish it from the defunct (since 2002) Politeia (journal), that does have an entry and appears to be intact. The problem seems to be notability and a suggestion that it is there only for advertising purposes. This is all rather too advanced for my capacities. Do you know some way of helping out? Sorry to be adding to your pile, so early in the year. Many thanks. --Po Mieczu (talk) 00:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you indeed for ensuring common sense prevailed in this instance. While I'm here, I note that you started the entry on the Ostroróg family ages ago. You may like to know I have done pages on three of them, Stanisław Julian Ostroróg and two of his surviving sons, Stanisław Julian Ignacy Ostroróg and especially the latest, Leon Walerian Ostroróg. Now Leon may interest you as someone who wrote already in 1911 about Japan as a potential template in statecraft for the then burgeoning state of Turkey. How these Poles get into some unexpected places! Kind regards, --Po Mieczu (talk) 13:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Someone has got the bit between the teeth and really objects to the journal. It is now listed for deletion, while I have been welcomed to Wikipedia!! Best wishes, --Po Mieczu (talk) 09:29, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Help get the new draft approved: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shrihari_Sathe
Can you please help get the new draft approved, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Shrihari_Sathe ? (Followup to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Uma.infinitum#Proposed_deletion_of_Shrihari_Sathe) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.251.188.241 (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Dear anon, I am sorry I don't have time to help you. Please ask at WP:TEAHOUSE. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you!
I accept this discernment from a very special source. Kind regards, --Po Mieczu (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:58, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
The article has many red links. This may be a yet another stumbling block at WP:TDYK. I would suggest to convert them into plain text until the dust settles. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
I notice that a while back you stuck a {{notability}} tag on the Martha Choe article. She served on the Seattle City Council, which only has nine members at a time, so I don't think there is any doubt about notability. I suspect that a different tag might be in order -- the article needs to be fleshed out better -- but I don't think notability is in question. Would you agree to remove this, or replace it with something else?
(I ran across this because I was adding a photo to the article.) - Jmabel | Talk 05:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Carmen Mory
On 13 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carmen Mory, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Swiss-German spy Carmen Mory, later a Nazi concentration camp kapo, was described as a "third-rate Mata Hari"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carmen Mory. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Carmen Mory), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
– Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of John Radzilowski for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Radzilowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Radzilowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 06:32, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
GA reassessment
Second Partition of Poland, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hdjensofjfnen (♪ Oh, can I get a connection? Alternatively, trout me.) 22:46, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
This Month in Education: January 2019
The Signpost: 31 January 2019
- Op-Ed: Random Rewards Rejected
- News and notes: WMF staff turntable continues to spin; Endowment gets more cash; RfA continues to be a pit of steely knives
- Discussion report: The future of the reference desk
- Featured content: Don't miss your great opportunity
- Arbitration report: An admin under the microscope
- Traffic report: Death, royals and superheroes: Avengers, Black Panther
- Technology report: When broken is easily fixed
- News from the WMF: News from WMF
- Recent research: Ad revenue from reused Wikipedia articles; are Wikipedia researchers asking the right questions?
- Essay: How
- Humour: Village pump
- From the archives: An editorial board that includes you
DYK for The Nature of Prejudice
On 10 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Nature of Prejudice, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1954 social psychology book The Nature of Prejudice is considered a classic that defined the field of intergroup relations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Nature of Prejudice. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Nature of Prejudice), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Hey
Could you take a look at Draft:David M. Posner? The subject was apparently important enough for The New York Times to write about him, but it was declined by a relatively inexperienced editor on grounds of notability. I thought you'd probably know more about it than I do. WhatamIdoing (talk) 20:01, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Updating Entire Page
To whom it may concern,
Several classmates and I from English 102 were assigned the task of editing a Wikipedia article. We choose the campus card page. We've spent several weeks working on it and strongly believe it is accurate and very informative now. The previous page was filled with plagiarism but we have corrected that.
Thanks!
Cwichtricks99 (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
WikiProjects
It seems to me that I used to do that, but forgot somewhere along the way. Thank you for the reminder. WQUlrich (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- P.S., I still have your Wiki-kitten on my user page! WQUlrich (talk) 06:47, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Galina Serebryakova
Hi Piotrus, Thank you for your messages. I have tried entering Serebryakova in the Did You Know section, but, being technologically illiterate, I was defeated by instructions which, being stupid, I couldn't understand. Wizlon Don — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizlon, Don (talk • contribs) 16:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Books & Bytes, Issue 32
Books & Bytes
Issue 32, January – February 2019
- #1Lib1Ref
- New and expanded partners
- Wikimedia and Libraries User Group update
- Global branches update
- Bytes in brief
French version of Books & Bytes is now available on meta!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
KPK
In regards to - diff - you assertion that the KPK are a "respectable Polish-American NGO" - I am not sure you are aware of the distinctions between the different North American Polish groups (and there are a few) - the KPK is quite the outlier. They have for instance advocated that a central focus in a human's rights museum should be on atrocities vs. Poles (protesting over emphasis of the Holocaust).[3] They are zealously anti-communist,[4] and if I recall correctly were the last group (in the 70s and 80s) to recognize the Polish government in exile. They have protested against portrays of the infamous Kielce pogrom in theater, asserting lack of Polish involvement in this and other massacres (counter to established historical sources), and advocated stressing incidents of "Jews killing Poles". According to Piotr Wróbel (Polish-Canadian, chair of Polish studies at UToronto) they are "aggressively right-wing".[5] Just in case you want to amend your statement.Icewhiz (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- In a similar fashion - in the Jewish-American community - there are very large differences in the specturm of Jewish Defense League-Zionist Organization of America-American Jewish Congress-HIAS. HIAS is the diametrical opposite of ZOA in just about every respect. Icewhiz (talk) 09:45, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Nagielski1995-203
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Leszek Podhorodecki (1 January 1998). Stefan Czarniecki. Książka i Wiedza. p. 60. ISBN 978-83-86170-36-4. Retrieved 22 June 2012.
- ^ Hankivsky, Olena, and Rita Kaur Dhamoon. "Which genocide matters the most? An intersectionality analysis of the Canadian Museum of Human Rights." Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique 46.4 (2013): 899-920.
- ^ Polec, Patryk. "From Hurrah Revolutionaries to Polish Patriots: The Rise of Polish Canadian Radicalism, 1918-1939." Polish American Studies 68.2 (2011): 43-66.
- ^ Levin, Laura, Belarie Zatzman, and Joel Greenberg. "Studio 180’s Political Engagements: Finding the Jewish Soul in Canadian Theatre." Canadian Theatre Review 153 (2013): 50-55.
DYK for Bierut Decree
On 27 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bierut Decree, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 1945 Bierut Decree nationalized all land in the Polish capital of Warsaw after the city's destruction by the Nazis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bierut Decree. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bierut Decree), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
This Month in Education: February 2019
project: == Proposed deletion of William H. Rease ==
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article William H. Rease has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
nn
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 05:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
Your statement at AE
While I realise the complaint is complex, your statement at AE is well over double the length restriction. It is far more likely to be read if you could cut it down to something nearer the 500-word limit. Don't go berserk, there is some leeway; as it stands, it's a bit impenetrable. GoldenRing (talk) 09:56, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2019
- From the editors: Help wanted (still)
- News and notes: Front-page issues for the community
- Discussion report: Talking about talk pages
- Featured content: Conquest, War, Famine, Death, and more!
- Arbitration report: A quiet month for Arbitration Committee
- Traffic report: Binge-watching
- Technology report: Tool labs casters-up
- Gallery: Signed with pride
- From the archives: New group aims to promote Wiki-Love
- Humour: Pesky Pronouns