User talk:PontiacAurora

February 2022

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Rams–Seahawks rivalry, from its old location at User:PontiacAurora/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 06:10, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rams–Seahawks rivalry has been accepted

Rams–Seahawks rivalry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ArsenalGhanaPartey (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

About Rams-Chargers Rivalry

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Rams-Chargers Rivalry a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Rams–Chargers rivalry. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 08:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Chargers–Rams rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chargers–Rams rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chargers–Rams rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

« Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Conduct Warning

Hi PontiacAurora. Please consider this a warning on your conduct at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chargers–Rams rivalry, specifically this comment. Not only are you failing to be civil, but your comment could be viewed as an implicit threat of doxxing an editor. If any of this behavior continues, I will block you.

You are new here and I understand the frustration that comes with having an article you worked on getting tagged for deletion. But please take a second to realize that nothing is personal and that we are all following the deletion policy and notability policy in determining if an article is appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia. Personal views or preferences do not supersede the policies and guidelines that have been developed over the last 20 years by thousands of editors. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Chargers–Rams rivalry moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chargers–Rams rivalry, has been draftified by closure of a deletion discussion. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 04:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PontiacAurora

Thank you for creating St Luke Medical Center (Pasadena, California).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ PontiacAurora (talk) 03:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)Thank you!! :)PontiacAurora (talk) 03:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Dodgers–Padres rivalry

Hello PontiacAurora. There seems to be decent support for changing the name of your article. Under the “Requested Move 12 August 2022” section, do you mind typing “Support” and just saying something like “due to reasons stated above?” Thanks a lot. Jewel15 (talk) 23:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Taran Killam

Hi. A belated welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Taran Killam, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted for the following reasons:

First, you removed mention of the jersey, but without providing a rationale for this in an edit summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page.

Second, you added the term "puffery" to the passage, which violates MOS:PUFFERY.

Lastly, your rewrite of the sentence left it incoherent, without a valid subject-predicate structure. Instead, you left it with two separate predicates, that are not connected in a grammatically correct manner.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:55, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rams-Saints Rivalry

Hello, PontiacAurora. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rams-Saints Rivalry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chargers–Rams rivalry has been accepted

Chargers–Rams rivalry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 09:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Chargers–Rams rivalry moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chargers–Rams rivalry, is not suitable as written to remain published. It is substantively the same article which did not pass AfD earlier this year. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:00, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chargers–Rams rivalry (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chargers–Rams rivalry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, PontiacAurora! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 17:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Cardinals–Dodgers rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cardinals–Dodgers rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardinals–Dodgers rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 18:41, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Chargers–Rams rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chargers–Rams rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chargers–Rams rivalry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Frank Anchor 13:47, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Los Angeles Angels into Major League Baseball rivalries. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Los Angeles Dodgers

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Los Angeles Dodgers, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Los Angeles Dodgers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 20:09, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm FMSky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Chino Moreno, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 00:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

which segment? I can provide another to anchor that edit PontiacAurora (talk) 01:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Woodstock. Sundayclose (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

please elaborate, User:Another Believer redirected me to a nonexistent talk page on Woodstock 50, removing an edit that belonged there. PontiacAurora (talk) 23:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

I will actually contest your warning, I can re apply those edits with citations PontiacAurora (talk) 23:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

These edits added content without a source. It doesn't matter if the content is in a another article. Read WP:V. Contest all you want, but don't make the edits again without citing reliable sources. Sundayclose (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

alright fair enough PontiacAurora (talk) 00:11, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Astros-Mariners rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astros-Mariners rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astros-Mariners rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Start Something

Can you restore UK style dates for the album by the Welsh band Lostprophets? The article should have UK spelling and dates. Thanks. Binksternet (talk) 04:46, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

sounds good PontiacAurora (talk) 05:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Diamondbacks–Rockies rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diamondbacks–Rockies rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamondbacks–Rockies rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Frank Anchor 16:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

well I appreciate the notice PontiacAurora (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Woodstock '99

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Woodstock '99, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Angels–Mariners rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Angels–Mariners rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angels–Mariners rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Frank Anchor 16:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Eh, this one was in a bizarre grey area PontiacAurora (talk) 02:52, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Golden Knights-Kings rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golden Knights-Kings rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Knights-Kings rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Conyo14 (talk) 08:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

Hello, I'm ResolutionsPerMinute. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Feelin' Way Too Damn Good, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see WP:NOTRSMUSIC. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 16:40, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users, as you did on Wikipedia talk:Administrator intervention against vandalism, potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to harass other editors, you may be blocked from editing. This is your only warning about this; I saw you self-reverted (and it's on ANI now), but attacking other editors for removing material that violates WP:BLP (as was properly done on JoJo Siwa by MikeAllen) will not be tolerated. Nate • (chatter) 02:28, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm going to contest this, in what way did I harass MikeAllen? arguably it's the other way around PontiacAurora (talk) 02:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Some advice because I will likely not see any next dispute of yours. (1) This was a content dispute. MikeAllen was not vandalising. Reasonable people may differ on whether they see things as gossip. This should be settled at article talk pages, or noticeboards like WP:RSN, WP:BLPN, WP:NPOVN, and not WP:AIV. (2) MikeAllen can freely remove any warnings on his talk page. You should not have reverted his removals. (3) Demanding someone rescind a warning is likely fruitless and may even backfire. (4) Read Doxxing and learn what it is. starship.paint (exalt) 03:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your user page

The "Gender" and "Pronouns" sections in the infobox can be interpreted as being WP:POLEMIC; I think that just to be safe it would be a good idea to change it. Plus, the infobox in your userpage shows that you are an account creator, file mover, page mover, pending changes reviewer, template editor, administrator, CheckUser and Oversighter, but you do not have these rights. You also have the userboxes for rollbacker and page mover, but you do not have either one of these permissions. Also, it says you are #245 on the List of Wikipedians by edits but you are not on the most active editors list. — Prodraxis {talk • contributions} (she/her) 04:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

my bad! lemme modify it PontiacAurora (talk) 05:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

I never knew wikipedia had a discord server lol PontiacAurora (talk) 05:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

As Prodraxis said, your rant about gender and pronouns violates WP:POLEMIC (Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia, or statements attacking or vilifying groups of editors, persons, or other entities), so I have gone ahead and removed those lines. Feel free to replace with something appropriate for that context such as "male" and "he/him". Happy editing. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

If you're trying to get it to display something custom like "A dude", then that goes under the |custom_gender= parameter. The |gender= parameter is just male/female/other, and decides what icon gets put next to "Wikipedian". -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 05:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

thank you! idk, my intent was more so just to poke fun at such a hotly divisive subject going on. I have no hatred or ill will against anybody in the LGBT community, we're all one group of people. PontiacAurora (talk) 06:30, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

No worries, I get it. Humor through text can be hard, especially on sensitive subjects. I find that, when people do go for that kind of humor, it's most effective when it's absurdist rather than straight satire... But also often just best avoided on a site like Wikipedia. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 09:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

I understand where you are coming from. But as Tamzin said above it is best to avoid it on Wikipedia because it is simply harder to get your message across text. However, your userpage still states "yes" for File Mover and Page mover and that you are an "occasional" Template Editor even if you have none of these user rights and it also shows the userboxes for rollbacker and Page mover even if you do not have these rights. — Prodraxis {talk • contributions} (she/her) 14:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Start Something

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Start Something, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Content dispute on Deftones (album)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Deftones (album). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Finally, it looks like several of your edit recent edit summaries are less than civil and not constructive. Please communicate with civility and focus on content rather than trying to provoke other users. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:49, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Deftones (album). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Los Angeles Rams 2023 season

Hello PontiacAurora, I was entering a game summary for the Rams-Seahawks game from earlier today, but I see that an entry was made by you before mine was complete. Respectfully, I have been a contributor on the Los Angeles Rams' season pages ever since 2016. I am an experienced professional sportswriter and a published author. I have written every game summary for every Rams game since the franchise returned to Los Angeles, and I am respectfully asking you to let me continue with this responsibility. I have always worked to keep the Rams' season pages to be the best, most-concise, and well-informed team pages on Wikipedia, and my intention is to keep doing so. If you have any questions, you can reach me here. Sincerely - AUColonist (talk) 02:47, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

go for it! anyway, happy hunting! PontiacAurora (talk) 02:55, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lakers–Warriors rivalry

Hello, PontiacAurora. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lakers–Warriors rivalry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PontiacAurora. Thank you for your work on Tigers–White Sox rivalry. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:04, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I'm glad you found enjoyment in that article! PontiacAurora (talk) 03:35, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PontiacAurora. Thank you for your work on 49er Faithful. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

IMO and edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking it as reviewed. Thanks for your work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

fine with me! thank you! PontiacAurora (talk) 05:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Before creating a category, as you did to Category:Abandoned hospitals in Canada, please make sure that the categories are connected to existing categories. I noticed that you've made several categories without connecting them to existing categories. Please connect categories to existing categories so that other people can benefit from your efforts Mason (talk) 17:21, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Astros–Dodgers rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Astros–Dodgers rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astros–Dodgers rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nemov (talk) 03:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Diamondbacks–Dodgers rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diamondbacks–Dodgers rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamondbacks–Dodgers rivalry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spanneraol (talk) 13:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PontiacAurora. Thank you for your work on Red Sea (football). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Adam Gontier and the Houston Texans

I checked the three sources you provided at Houston Texans to say Adam Gontier is a fan of the team but two don't mention his name at all and the other doesn't mention the team. Where did you get this claim? Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

National Football League Draft Busts moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to National Football League Draft Busts. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SounderBruce 00:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! that was my own mistake, I had a few tagged onto it but I neglected to check before switching it to an article PontiacAurora (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Diamondbacks–Dodgers rivalry for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diamondbacks–Dodgers rivalry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamondbacks–Dodgers rivalry (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 02:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Metallica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthrax (band). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Kansas City Chiefs

Kansas City Chiefs has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 18:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi PontiacAurora. Thank you for your work on Battle of Alberta (NHL). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for your work. IMO, from the sources supplied, this is an editor-synthesized topic. Not to say that everything in it isn't reaal world events. The only reference I could find that referred to the "The Battle of Alberta" was a link to Twitter/X. I did npt take any action with this article. Possibly more sources that refer to and cover the topic AS SUCH can be found and added. Or leaving it for a different NPP'er to decide. Either way, thanks for your work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)