User talk:Powder Hound 3000

prior accounts

Have you ever had another account on Wikipedia? nableezy - 21:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many edits as an IP. Powder Hound 3000 (talk) 21:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But no registered accounts? nableezy - 21:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, not on this wiki. Powder Hound 3000 (talk) 21:53, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Breein's unblock request

Thank you for your message. An uninvolved administrator needs to review his unblock request, and I am involved in this situation. I will try to draw additional attention to the matter at AN/I. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your help with the AN/I etc. I'm figuring out what exactly to do about bringing abusive admins (as well as their non-admin friends) to the attention of the community for investigation. Breein1007 (talk) 20:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of NoCal100 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Powder Hound 3000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have nothing to do with NoCal100, or any other editor. Feel free to run a CU, or whatever

Decline reason:

After consulting with the blocking admin I am satisfied this block was made properly. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.