Jump to content

User talk:Prakhar Co.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Prakhar Co., and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

September 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shivam Patil has been reverted.
Your edit here to Shivam Patil was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=158381261021720&set=a.146534602206386.1073741827.146530042206842&type=1&theater) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prakhar Co., you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Prakhar Co.! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivamevolution, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

LGA talkedits 07:05, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Rschen7754 07:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prakhar Co. (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Decline reason:

I don't think I believe your explanation, but even if I did I would not be inclined to unblock you. It is not Wikipedia admins who fail to understand the situation, it is yourself. When you ignore messages from other users trying to explain to you what you are doing wrong and you just keep insisting you are the only one who understands how things should be done here, that demonstrates an inability or unwillingness to work in a collaborative environment like this. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Sir ,I have not been using any other account myself .We are living in a hostel and all of my room mates use the same computer and LAN i.e the same IP address and one of my room mates has his name same as mine ( i.e. Prakhar ) .So we have accounts with almost the same names . But both accounts belong to different people. Moreover , in our hostel we can use internet only for a FEW hours , so the edits we all have to make are to be done within that span of 2 to 3 hours . So we do that within that span of time . As a result of this , the time between edits is very less. . We have made very usefull contributions to wikipedia and i am really disapointed with the way wikipedia admins are responding to our edits . We are making these edits just to contribute towards increasing quality information on wikipedia but you people are not understanding the nature of that information . We have been editing large number of pages on wikipedia , not just TWO pages as mentioned in the report . The information is false . Please unblock all of us or you might lose some good users of wikipedia :) I'l be thankful to you if you unblock us(all accounts under discussion) . Prakhar Co. (talk) 08:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)