User talk:Qamar1122

September 2019

It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account.
Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted by Wikipedia policy.

For both of those reasons, either of which alone would have been enough, the page you have created has been deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:24, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Qamar1122. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See WP:PAID. The new version of the page you have created avoids the copyright problem, but it still looks rather like use of Wikipedia for promotion, but rather than deleting it I have left it for you to improve. However, a Wikipedia user page is for someone who is active in working for the project to give a little information about himself or herself in connection with his or her work for the encyclopaedia: it is not a place to material unrelated to work for Wikipedia, so I have moved the page to Draft:American Professional Certification Services, which is the correct kind of title for a draft article. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:10, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:American Professional Certification Services

Hello, Qamar1122. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "American Professional Certification Services".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]