Jump to content

User talk:QayamHadi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, QayamHadi, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, QayamHadi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:30, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Article Should be Published on Wikipedia QayamHadi (talk) 06:20, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:QayamHadi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 07:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:QayamHadi/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:QayamHadi/sandbox. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:14, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Information icon Hi QayamHadi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Arshi Naqvi that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 16:11, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arshi Naqvi, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:57, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello QayamHadi. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Arshi Naqvi, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:QayamHadi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=QayamHadi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to User:QayamHadi, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:QayamHadi, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=QayamHadi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Kj_cheetham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shut up and do your own business please let me publish Arshi Naqvi Article on Wikipedia QayamHadi (talk) 10:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:QayamHadi. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Arshi Naqvi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RealKnockout (talk) 21:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Real Person Arshi Naqvi and this should be published Here in Wikipedia QayamHadi (talk) 05:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your article was previously moved to draft space by an administrator. You then moved it back to article space. First, it's obvious you have a conflict of interest with this individual, and undisclosed paid editing is a violation of policy. Second, you must declare your conflict as per the instructions. In addition, do not move the biography back to article space. You must use WP:AFC.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arshi Naqvi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arshi Naqvi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arshi Naqvi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Kj cheetham (talk) 09:30, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This Wikipedia Should be Published Because this is the real person and there are many degree and certificates of this person QayamHadi (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just because it's a real person doesn't mean they are WP:NOTABLE. Please comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arshi Naqvi if you think they are notable. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the Most Popular Name as Arshi Naqvi He is the first Muslim Professor to get the Members of West Bengal School Service Commission Honourable Member of West Bengal School Service Commission (S.R) since 2012.[1] He is the first Muslim professor of Urdu Subject who is appointed as an honourable member of WBSSC. He is also one of the Honarable members of Boards of Studies (UG) in University of Calcutta and as a life Member of Asiatic Society, Kolkata.He works as a Associate Professor In the Department of Urdu Kidderpore College Kolkata since 1998 and also attached with the Department of Urdu in University of Calcutta as a Guest Lecturer since 2012. In 1998, He started working as a lecturer at Kidderpore College. His first edited book was published in 2006 entitled Wahshat Shanasi from the Department of Urdu, Kidderpore College. Wahshat Kalkatvi was the renowned Urdu Poet of Bengal also know as Ghalib E Sani. His Second book was "Wahshat Kalkatvi : Mushaheer-e-Adab ki Nazron mein". He also edited the book entitled "Rubaiyat E Mir Taqi Mir" in 2018.

He published his Thesis entitled as "Wahshat Kalkatvi: Hayat aur Karname". This is the first thesis which was awarded from University of Calcutta on the above mentioned Topic in 2012.

He Organised two day national Seminar from the Department of Urdu Kidderpore College, Kolkata sponsored by the West Bengal Urdu Academy under his Headship in 2018

He attended and delivered Lectures and present his Paper in different literary programs and seminars in Kolkata. He was awarded as "Maulvi Abdul Haq Award 2017" in 2019 from The West Bengal Urdu Academy. QayamHadi (talk) 10:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He had Written Four Popular book And some book had ISBN Number QayamHadi (talk) 10:39, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, QayamHadi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Arshi Naqvi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had started the article from 10 days ago and writting about the popular people not my family I completely all my works and then I go toward my next topic of articles Please unblock me QayamHadi (talk) 14:38, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:QayamHadi, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did with this edit to Arshi Naqvi. SunDawntalk 10:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:58, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please[edit]

Please unblock me I will be not do anything Please

Please unblock me QayamHadi (talk) 11:42, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:36, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QayamHadi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

By Mistake Some one had blocked me As I am a good Person and only Writing article I will not disturb any one and I am a friend's we all are friends so please unblock me I am a good Person And writing the article only QayamHadi (talk) 14:35, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Well, for one thing this doesn't sound like something a "good person" would say. For another, your request is far too broad and far too general to demonstrate that you understand what you did wrong. And for a last thing, I am not sure if your English-language skills are adequate to the task of editing and collaborating here. Perhaps you should work on the Wikipedia in your native language (Arabic maybe? That Wikipedia could always use more editors IMO). — Daniel Case (talk) 17:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Even if it had not been for the problems mentioned by Daniel Case, and many more that he didn't mention, you would have made sure that you wouldn't be unblocked by using another account to try to get round the block. That is one of the most reliable ways of making sure that an account remains firmly blocked. JBW (talk) 20:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]