User talk:R283764

Welcome

Hello R283764 and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Kat Slater, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! 5 albert square (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 10:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ian Beale—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 18:31, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mandy Salter

Hello, I'm FishLoveHam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mandy Salter have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. You continuously add that she and Ian Beale married, when they did not, and that the character is returning when, at this date, there is no news about that. FishLoveHam (talk) 22:49, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sharon Watts

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sharon Watts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FishLoveHam (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Branning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lauren Branning. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. FishLoveHam (talk) 17:21, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Branning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bradley Branning. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. He did not marry Syd and while this would usually go unnoticed and just be reverted, you repeatedly add false information surrounding marriages in articles about EastEnders characters. FishLoveHam (talk) 17:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please Stop. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lauren Branning, Sharon Watts and Bradley Branning. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 18:27, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024 2

Hey. Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism - specifically, your edit to User:FishLoveHam/Stevie Mitchell. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Please let me know if you have any questions at all. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:52, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Please Stop your disruptive vandalism. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Linda Carter and Pat Butcher. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malinaccier (talk) 01:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how long am i blocked for ? R283764 (talk) 13:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

R283764 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here R283764 (talk) 23:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 08:49, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

i will be nicer this team give me a chance :) R283764 (talk) 23:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC) unblock|reason=the blocking is rigged and biased against me[reply]

Can you explain why you think that the blocking is biased against you? You were warned several times by myself and three other editors and you did not stop or even reply. If you had listened then this block could have been avoided. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 08:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so, when can I be unbanned? R283764 (talk) 00:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello when is the account unbanned? I will be better next time as i have been annoying in the past i guess.

If you are serious about being unblocked, you need to seriously address the reasons you were blocked. You made many edits that needed to be reverted, with common changes being removing pictures, editing picture data inappropriately, inaccurately changing names without sourcing, and adding implausible dates in the future to when an actor played a character, and so on. An admin has to be confident that you understand why you are blocked, and that you will avoid these types of behaviors in the future. Blaming your block on people being biased against you and then just asking when you can be unbanned is not going to result in anyone taking this request seriously. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 02:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

R283764 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am once again asking for my ban to be removed. This is because upon looking at my edits, they are disruptive and i am sorry. I mainly did it to make other people laugh but now i see thats wrong and i can just use the sandbox. If you do unban me i will make limited helpful contributions and if you notice me being out of line, you can immediatley block me and i will not argue. thanks for your time.R283764 (talk) 21:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Note that there is a difference between being banned and being blocked; you are blocked. Please describe in a new request one substantive contribution you wish to make; it doesn't need to be a multi paragraph addition, but it needs to be more than fixing spelling or grammar. 331dot (talk) 10:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I fixed your request so your statement replaced the words "your reason here" as intended. If you make a new request, you need to remove "your reason here" and put your statement in its place. 331dot (talk) 10:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]