User talk:Rahuagra502

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Muchness 09:59, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Allahabad.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Allahabad.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in INA Market

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on INA Market, by Seattlenow (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because INA Market is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting INA Market, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Rahuagra502, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 03:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birlasoft Inc deleted

This was a copy paste of another article. Seems suspicious. Awaiting your reply . Dloh cierekim 02:46, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your note. Well firstly, it would be better not to start with a copy-paste of another article. That will probably be deleted again on sight. You can create a subpage on which to work on articles at User:Rahuagra502/test. An article will need to be based on third party sources not connected to the subject. Information must be verifiable. Articles need to be neutral. It is not a good idea to write about subjects with which you have a connection, such as working for the subject, as it produces the potential for a conflict of interest. See WP:COI. You say you need to create it. If your employer wishes to use a Wikipedia article to promote his business or as a form of advertising, that is not Wikipedia's purpose. Please see WP:SOAP. Adverts and promotional material masquerading as an article may be subject to speedy deletion. See WP:CSD. Articles about businesses must meet the notability requirement-- see WP:CORP. Articles that do not show meeting notability requirements may also be subject to speedy deletion. Hope this helps. Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim 02:57, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Madidai Ka Mandir

A tag has been placed on Madidai Ka Mandir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Abhishek ^Talk^|Contribs 12:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shri Sadguru Seva Sangh

A tag has been placed on Shri Sadguru Seva Sangh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. FlyingToaster 04:11, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page List of Open Education Insitution has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. DanielDeibler (talk) 05:05, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Madidai Ka Mandir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madidai Ka Mandir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madidai Ka Mandir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Skeletor3000 (talk) 21:16, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:04, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]