User talk:Rahulkarmakar

September 2017

Hello, I'm 72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Prabir Ghosh— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. –72 _(talk) 15:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Prabir Ghosh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Titanium Wolf (talk) 15:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Prabir Ghosh, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Titanium Wolf (talk) 15:22, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. WingbackSortino (talk) 06:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rahulkarmakar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:34, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account is one of a group of related accounts which have been created for the sole purpose of promoting the reputation of one person, both by adding laudatory content about him and by removing content unfavourable to him. The user or users of these accounts have persistently acted in violation of various Wikipedia policies, taking no notice of messages informing them of those policies and asking them to stop. At least one of these accounts has been blocked from editing since well over two years ago to prevent such abusive editing, so the subsequent accounts are effectively being used to evade that block.

This account has been indefinitely blocked from editing, and you may expect that any more accounts that are created in order to misuse Wikipedia in the same way may be blocked without further warning. The article which you have been editing has been protected to prevent your abuse. Unfortunately such page protection causes inconvenience for legitimate editors, as well as stopping your activities, so please don't make it necessary for the article to be protected for even longer, by returning to similar editing when the current protection expires.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]