User talk:Rajendrapppangeni

Welcome![edit]

Hi Rajendrapppangeni! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fragrant Peony (talk) 05:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing for beginners[edit]

Hello Rajendrapppangeni, kindly make sure to read referencing for beginners, and to use a reference template next time; so as the encyclopedia's paragraphs don't get corrupted like what happened after your edit at DNA methylation in cancer. Thank you and welcome to Wikipedia!

Fragrant Peony (talk) 06:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I am now learning. I will follow the guidelines for sure. Rajendrapppangeni (talk) 06:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rajendrapppangeni/sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Rajendrapppangeni/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.nirinepal.org/niri-introduction/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Rajendrapppangeni. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Rajendra Pangeni, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Andumé (talk) 08:08, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation (NIRI), Nepal moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation (NIRI), Nepal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:13, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 06:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation (January 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:Sigcov.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rajendrapppangeni! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Malinar, I am quite disappointed that you rejected my article even after I have revised and added additional citations. I am going to work now, and I hope you will take positively. Rajendrapppangeni (talk) 06:22, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rajendrapppangeni (talk) 07:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 07:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajendra Pangeni for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajendra Pangeni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajendra Pangeni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nexus Institute of Research and Innovation (February 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Usedtobecool was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 09:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajendrapppangeni. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 13:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am slowly trying to learn to contribute to Wikipedia but realized its been overwhelming and also discouraging to an extent. Rajendrapppangeni (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not complicated at all. Just don't write about yourself. This is an encyclopedia, not a marketing platform. And try to build trust, not break it, by, for example, pretending to be multiple people. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]