User talk:RakiaLittle

Welcome to Rakia Little's talk page. Here you can talk to me on Wikipedia. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~ ~ ~ ~ but without spaces)

No vandalism and disruptive editing on my account because I could get blocked[edit]

Please do not block me just because you think my user and user talk page are vandalism. They are not vandalism, I promise! Do not block this account. RakiaLittle (talk) 01:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bald guys[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Bald guys, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GILO A&E⇑ 02:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rakia Little[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rakia Little requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GILO A&E⇑ 02:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is true that your "article" is not vandalism, but it does not satisfy Wikipedia policies including notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:NotvandalismfromRakiaLittle[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:NotvandalismfromRakiaLittle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GILO A&E⇑ 02:04, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 02:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RakiaLittle, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi RakiaLittle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Templates by Rakia Little[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Category:Templates by Rakia Little, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship[edit]

The nomination will probably have be closed in a few minutes for being misguided. While I wanted to direct you to the advice page, it's still way too early for you. Since you seem to have good intentions, I advice you to read through Wikipedia:Help desk and familiarize yourself with how to become an editor here. Alex Shih ^Talk 05:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple users of this account[edit]

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia - could you clarify how many people have access to this account? Unfortunately we do not allow shared accounts, so given your user page I must ask that you reset this accounts password and keep it private to yourself. You may of course ask relatives to help you, but they should not use your account to edit. If you have any questions or need any help, please feel free to leave me a message or visit The Teahouse -- There'sNoTime ^{(to explain)} 07:04, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RakiaLittle[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RakiaLittle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

We probably shouldn't speedy RfA's, but this is just disruptive, especially considering Rakia's previous RfA was deleted a mere week ago. No point in having this discussion per WP:NOTNOW and WP:SNOW.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SkyWarrior 03:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 03:48, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RakiaLittle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Oops. It was a mistake. Please delete Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/RakiaLittle. I did contribute to Wikipedia. I didn't vandalize at all. Please don't decline my request!

Accept it! RakiaLittle (talk) 03:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Having reviewed the case with the blocking administrator, there is no consensus to unblock you. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's my deal - provided the blocking administrator, Berean Hunter accepts it, I am willing to unblock you per this advice page. However, be advised that if this happens, the very next edit you make that is considered disruptive will be met by an immediate indefinite block with absolutely no chance of appeal. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:11, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's a couple of other problems apart from the behavior. In this now-deleted userpage, intent is stated to share the account and the edit summaries in their contribs indicate that more than one editor is using it, sometimes Sam and sometimes Rakia. "I'm Sam..." vs. "I am Rakia..." which isn't allowed per WP:SHAREDACCOUNT. The other problem which might could have been avoided is that this doesn't appear to be their first account. Had they behaved, Clean Start could have applied. Their very first edit-summary to the now-deleted userpage was "Do not block this account.I will not vandalize and do disruptive editing." which indicates that they were previously blocked. This is a theme they repeat in their other edits.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 11:47, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Sam Spielberg (GoogleFanatic2017)[edit]

I'm sorry, I won't make sockpuppet accounts anymore. I will be more mature from now on, I will act like an administrator and fix all vandalism. I promise. RakiaLittle (talk) 04:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sw super why.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sw super why.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sw super why.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sw super why.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]