Jump to content

User talk:Rakibi76542

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Rakibi76542, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 09:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Rose in Bangladesh (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rakibi76542! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:39, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:15, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to E-commerce in Bangladesh have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 13:46, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Online shopping in Bangladesh, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Do not ever add links to this page again unless they are to actual Wikipedia articles. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Rakibi76542/sandbox[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rakibi76542. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Rakibi76542/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Black Rose in Bangladesh[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rakibi76542. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black Rose in Bangladesh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Black Rose in Bangladesh[edit]

Hello, Rakibi76542. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Rose in Bangladesh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My article never been approve that's the reason never publish this article. 103.113.225.118 (talk) 03:09, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Microdeft[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Microdeft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Information icon

Hello Rakibi76542. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Microdeft, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rakibi76542. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rakibi76542|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:31, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Microdeft moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Microdeft. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you have a declared conflict of interest. As such, this page should be submitted through our AFC process. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 05:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Microdeft moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Microdeft. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rakibi76542 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All give URL is valid and its a verified URL there no reason to block my any of url.Rakibi76542 (talk) 09:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The validity of a url is not at issue here. You are blocked for spamming, but do not discuss that in this request. If you have a connection to the company you created a draft about, you will need to disclose that as well, see WP:COI and WP:PAID. 331dot (talk) 10:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rakibi76542 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My bad—I didn't mean to stir up trouble. I've learned my lesson and promise to be on my best behavior from now on. Please give me another chance to contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. Thanks for considering my plea

Decline reason:

Given the tone of that draft, we'll need you to explain what you did was wrong, why it was wrong, and what will change. MER-C 12:25, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rakibi76542 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked due to the inclusion of a spam link in my previous contributions. I want to sincerely apologize for this oversight, as it was unintentional on my part. I realize the importance of maintaining the integrity of the platform, and I am committed to adhering to all guidelines moving forward. I have carefully reviewed the guide to appealing blocks and acknowledge the gravity of the situation. I assure you that I will be more vigilant in the future to prevent any recurrence of such mistakes. I kindly request that you reconsider my block and grant me the opportunity to continue contributing constructively to the platform. If there are any specific actions I need to take or additional information you require, please let me know, and I will promptly address them. Rakibi76542 (talk) 07:17, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This demonstrates you don't understand what was wrong with your edits. It was not just because "of a spam link". Yamla (talk) 11:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rakibi76542&oldid=1189691922"