User talk:Rakokute007

October 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagiratha. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 17:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bhagiratha. Bbb23 (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't simply edited... it's for more information purpose... Rakokute007 (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Uppara, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:48, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Uppara, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unauthorized content which are false are removed.You come to India and analyse true facts. Please don't interfere and Prove your false claims Rakokute007 (talk) 12:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Materialscientist you are not Indian,Just don't interfere in our religious matters. When facts are completely false obviously I'll remove

If you interfere again Serious legal action will be taken against you Rakokute007 (talk) 07:22, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Admantine123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lonia have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Admantine123 (talk) 07:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Admantine123 (talk) 18:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lonia, you may be blocked from editing. Admantine123 (talk) 17:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your fake propaganda about Indian Religious Communites will surely fetch you obvious legal strict just shut up and search what is true and not based on Religious sources not British colonial modified sources about Nonia community. Rakokute007 (talk) 12:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lonia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:41, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Primefac (talk) 15:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #79550 [edit]

is open -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. "To be unblocked, on your user talk page, you will need to withdraw your legal threat and you will need to describe what dispute resolution procedures you would need to follow in a content dispute. Take care." -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At least two legal threats on this page . . . . . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]