Jump to content

User talk:Ramdrake/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Snyderman

Would you mind giving your reasons on the talk page for deleting so much material from the Snyderman article? David.Kane (talk) 18:08, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure. See here.--Ramdrake (talk) 18:20, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring at Race and intelligence

Hello Ramdrake. Please see the complaint about your edits at WP:AN3#User:Ramdrake and User:88.147.29.155 reported by User:Captain Occam (Result: ). You may respond there if you wish. Since you've gone over 3RR you should promise to stop warring on this article. The IP has already been blocked by another admin, but it leaves open the question of why you were not blocked as well. EdJohnston (talk) 02:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

I had already decided to stop reverting, so no worries about that.--Ramdrake (talk) 04:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom Case

Rvcx recently filed a request for arbitration on Race and intelligence and the related articles.

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Race_and_Intelligence and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, Captain Occam (talk) 14:31, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

RFAR Race and intelligence

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 12:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

You're invited!

Hello, Ramdrake,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec) 

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Le Québec est une nation...version anglaise.

Salut,

Je suis toujours pas d'accord avec la version anglaise de québec... Si tu pouvais m'aider...--Mobifr (talk) 15:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

R & I Evidence

You wrote "Few of those who do not subscribe to the hypothesis don't even bother to write on the subject. The few that do bother to do so usually write analyses which demonstrate that the hypothesis is based on numerous flaws. Nevertheless these editors seem intent on writing the article as if both hypotheses were basically on equal footing."

I think you mean "even" instead of "don't even" in the first sentence. I can't speak for everyone, but I am almost certain that editors like me do not think that both hypotheses are on "equal footing." Instead, environmentalism is the predominant position among academics. Hereditarianism is a minority view. But we strongly believe that it is not WP:FRINGE.

Otherwise, I think this is a fair summary of the dispute. David.Kane (talk) 08:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Would you mind removing your vote until I have fleshed out my proposal?

A nice demonstration of good faith . . . David.Kane (talk) 14:12, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

I wouldn't mind removing it, but I see 1)you seem to have already fleshed out your proposal and 2)somebody else already expressed opposition to it besides myself.--Ramdrake (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
I have made the same request to him. David.Kane (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
I am now done. If you could expand your opposed vote to address my questions, I would appreciate it. David.Kane (talk) 14:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Gave full reasons on the proposal page. I hope my explanations are clear enough, even though by the very nature of the objection, I can't be more specific (ain't got no crystal ball!). Regards --Ramdrake (talk) 17:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

It's good to see you editing Race and intelligence again.

Right now while several I.P. editors are surfing by, it's good to have your eyes on the Race and intelligence article as the ArbCom case winds down. I look forward to digging into the sources with you to make sure that the article text reflects reliable sources well. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

I see the ArbCom case is proceeding and there may soon be clarity about where and how to edit articles on related topics. Keep up the good work till then, and, well, count on the admirals to soon be encouraged. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Race and intelligence

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following is a summary of the remedies enacted:

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,

NW (Talk) 22:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Discuss this

Nordic Race

I think you'd be interested in taking a look at this article. It is a GA.·Maunus·ƛ· 18:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Letter to The Economist January 29th–February 4th 2011

The ArbCom case on Race and intelligence is mentioned in a letter to The Economist.[1] -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ramdrake/Archive_4&oldid=1044482584"