User talk:Rashidalhabtoor

Welcome!

Hello, Rashidalhabtoor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Rashidalhabtoor/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! LynxTufts (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rashidalhabtoor/sandbox

A tag has been placed on User:Rashidalhabtoor/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. LynxTufts (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Rashidalhabtoor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rashid Al Habtoor, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 11:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for four reasons: (1) you have violated the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use by failing to disclose paid editing (see WP:PAID for details); (2) this communication suggests that you are impersonating Rashid Al Habtoor, and the account is not actually operated by him; (3) this account has repeatedly disrupted a biography article in spite of being informed that editors with a conflict of interest must propose substantive changes on the article's talk page; and (4) this communication further indicates that the account is operated by a "team" and is therefore considered a compromised account. Wikipedia does not permit accounts owned by organizations or groups, and if an account is accessible by more than one person, it will be blocked. An account must represent, and be accessed by, one person only.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rashidalhabtoor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Anachronist, Greetings ! You have blocked me for editing page Rashid al habtoor, Since the page has been designed for Mr. Rashid al habtoor upon his request and I am working under his company as a social media marketing manager. if you need any sort of verification if i am working in his company or not i can then provide all the supporting documents to you. Therefore , please unblock me from editing.

Decline reason:

Due to your promotional edits, conflict of interest and violations of Wikipedia's Terms of Use, you will no longer be permitted to write about your employer, Rashid al Habtoor, or related topics, on Wikipedia. if you have no other purpose in editing, then please go elsewhere. If you would still like to edit Wikipedia in your personal capacity on subjects where you do not have a conflict of interest, please make a new unblock request, provide a new username that you would like to use, and indicate what areas of Wikipedia you would edit if unlocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Rashidalhabtoor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #21399 was submitted on May 02, 2018 08:01:37. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:01, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have said that you are not Mr. Rashid al Habtoor himself, and that means you can not use his name as your username. If you make a new unblock request, please use {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use, and replace the text "Your reason here" with the reason you think you should be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Also, looking at this comment from you, it is clear that you do not understand what Wikipedia is or how it works. Wikipedia is not a social media site, and subjects (or their agents) do not get to own their articles or determine what they contain. Articles should be written from a neutral point of view, ideally by editors who are independent of the subject, and are open to anyone to edit. Articles are written about their subjects, not by their subjects. Anyone with a commercial/professional connection to a subject they wish to write about should adhere to Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and must follow paid editing policy. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Some of the words in my message are blue, which means they are links to pages you should read - all you need to do is click on them. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

page break

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rashidalhabtoor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello wikipedia team, Greetings ! This is Rashid al habtoor, I understand that my wikipedia account has been blocked for making several errors by my media person. The reason why i asked him to make editing because the information that was already published about me in wikipedia by anonymous is not something that i wish to be there.Either you remove the existing page of Rashid al habtoor or let me allow to make the changes myself by unblocking the IP address and new account creation facility. It is quite annoying that everytime i type my name in google and Rashid al habtoor Wikipedia page poped up with some negative information that ruins my business reputation. if you need any sort of verification or evidences , please contact me at my dubai office number <<gah. don't put phone numbers on wikipedia>>. I would also like to add one more thing that most of the time i am busy in business so i hired one online marketing executive to build my reputation online. if you think, you need my permission for him to do the editing , i can share an authorization letter for him to do so. if you think it can only be done by myself, no problem, that can also be done. Since this is my office IP address and many other employee use wikipedia , now they are also not able to use wikipedia as you lifted a block on it. I request you humbly please release all the blocks whatsoever and I would be very humble to you. Regards - Rashid al habtoor, Dubai rashidalhabtoor 03:54, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As this account was shared, it is considered compromised and will not be unblocked, as per WP:COMPROMISED. Additionally, as has already been pointed out to you, you have a conflict of interest. Please reread WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, WP:OWN, and WP:AUTOBIO, all of which you've been violating. Even if you set up another account, you will won't be permitted to write about yourself. Yamla (talk) 11:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Yamla, I am not going to write about myself. I want a page with my name in wikipedia with right information. I am going to use the verified citation for this purpose. I know it is considered compromised, but as i already mentioned that I was the one who requested my media person to create a profile on my behalf. Therefore,if you want to delete the complete page, i don't have any objection. you please delete it and I am going to write a fresh article with all the required policies and guidelines suggested by wikipedia.

Yeah, this is quite convoluted. This account was used by someone operating at your behest and they did things you did not like and now you want us to unblock this account and delete the page about you because it is annoying?

Please do not post your phone number on Wikipedia. It sounds like you want to place a take down notice. That cannot be done by editing here. The WMF office handles that sort of thing email them at info-en-q

wikimedia.org. You can give them your phone number and any other proof you are who you claim to be. See this page for more contact information. As to the unblock request, I believe you've been told before that we cannot unblock a compromised account. With all this confusion over who is behind the account, I certainly won't unblock. Hope this helps.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Build your reputation online, OMG, no. Please read WP:PROMO. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to "build your reputation." If there is any negative material you would like to challenge, let us know here and we will check. If it's reliably sourced, then we probably won't remove it. You can ask for its removal by contacting OTRS as I indicated'.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dlohcierekim, Thanks for your kind response. as per your valuable suggestions , I have now emailed to wikipedia team at : 'info-en-q@wikimedia.org' As you mentioned that you won't unblock, this will effect other users of wikipedia who are using the same IP address in my office. I fully understood that you've got confused with many editings. I do apologies for this mishap that annoyed you. Believe me , my account has never been compromised, as it was my online marketing executive only who was following my directions. He discussed and explained the complete matter to me. As far as my reputation building concerned , i always meant about that wikipedia is a universal platform and i never want it to show people what i am not in real. Inspite of citing many good sources / references somebody deleted them everytime. I want those articles also to flash in my account. The phone number i posted to make a verification check ,but now i learned that it is not as per wikipedia policy and I am going to be extra cautious from now onward before making anything in wikipedia. However, I have already requested wikipedia team through email to take down my account. so that I can create a whole new account that supplies information as per wikipedia guidelines and reliable sources only. please if you can resolve this issue, I would really be humble to you.

You claim "my account has never been compromised" and yet the first unblock request above says the account is operated by someone other than you, and now here you are operating that same account. That is the definition of compromised: the account has been used by more than one person. Therefore, we cannot unblock it. Because you and your media person have a conflict of interest, the only venue available for you to publish an article is Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Don't write about yourself in main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much Anachronist for getting me right definition of Account Compromise. The reason why I mentioned that my account has never been compromised is because my media person and me sit in the same office and we see each other everyday. when he made changes in my wikipedia article, he had shown it to me and I only approved the content. However I have given him full authority to work online on my behalf but I never knew that wikipedia might have objection on this matter. Therefore, After knowing the reason of blocked account, I have now took the charge to directly communicate with you. if you think I can make another account and make the editing my self, you need to help me to create new account which at the moment is disabled by you due to IP blocking. Hence, I request you to kindly make a release on my IP address. I would be really humble to you.

I would like to point out that the article is already sourced fro WP:RS.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:41, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will say, further, that Rashidalhabtoor and his media person must first agree that they will never again make any substantive change to the Rashid Al Habtoor article, as a condition for unblocking the IP address, and must adhere to that agreement as a condition for their new accounts remaining unblocked. Any changes to the article must be proposed on the article's talk page. They must further create separate accounts and declare their conflict of interest on their respective user pages. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anachronist, thanks for messaging me. I completely agree to the conditions that you mentioned in above message. I shall abide by the following regulations : 1. I Rashid Al Habtoor and My media person will never again make any substantive change to the Rashid Al habtoor Article.

             2. Any changes to the article would be presented on article's talk page first. 
             3. I Rashid Al habtoor and My media person will have a separate account
             4. I will not use my article for Promotion and advertisement purpose
             5. I will run my account myself and keep it confidential too.

However if i make a mistake , please advice me in your talk page before i publish changes.

Thanking you !

I have restored your ability to create a new account. Please reply here to let us know what it is, and please disclose your conflict of interest on your user page of the new account (that goes for your media person too). ~Anachronist (talk) 16:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anachronist, Thanks for restoring it. Since my page is protected , could you please help me to unprotect this page.

Dear Anachronist , I am rashid al habtoor and I would like to create an article for me. it is possible ? if yes, Do i need to create a whole new account. And what precaution i need to take while writing an article. I would like to submitted the article work with you first before publishing it. please guide me through.

Dear Anachronist, kindly also guide me how to diclose my conflict of interest on my user page of the new account. I already had lot of trouble that I don't want to repeat. Another question is about writing two article !!! I think I am not suppose to write about the topic that already exists. since Rashidalhabtoor page is already there and protected too. How i can write another article for rashid al habtoor. or is it ok to go ahead with new article and old article will then be deleted automatically. please guide me.

DEar Anachronist, I am thinking to write a new article with new username ( create new account ). The article structure is mentioned below. Could you please advice me whether i can go to write a new article ? if yes, then what would be the guideline to write an article as per wikipedia policies. thanks.

Dear Anachronist, Could you please help me to learn if what to avoid while writing a new article as I do not want to be blocked next time.

Dear Anchronist, this is rashid al habtoor and this is my new user name chasun6354 . This user name is created by me upon your instructions. To avoid any conflict of interest, I hereby declare to you that this username is not compromised at all and completely in my control. Can I now go ahead to write an article with this username. Would you please mind giving me useful advice before i start editing. Thanks and waiting for your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chasun6354 (talk • contribs) 06:04, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]