Jump to content

User talk:Rattify

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Speedy deletion of Indochine Estates Coffee[edit]

A tag has been placed on Indochine Estates Coffee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster (talk) 15:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did try to write a neutral article but obviously have failed. However, Indochine coffee is a sizeable producer in Vietnam having significant impact on its coffee production methods, and I think it should be represented here. I would very much appreciate someone else taking a stab at the article and perhaps doing a better job of it. It is possible to write neutral encyclopedic articles about commercial entities, as evidenced by the many articles already created, but I may not be the one to do it. I hesitate to try doing it myself again lest I make a bad name for myself and Indochine by failing to write the article properly a second time. Rattify (talk) 17:58, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Rattify[reply]