User talk:Reaper Eternal/Archive 4
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Something to Make You Laugh!
I note that you're a grammar-hunter. Advise you sit down, and ensure you are neither drinking anything, nor in need of a loo-break, before you visit the unofficial WikiZoo's first resident. Hope you like! ThatPeskyCommoner (talk) 16:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
User page: Cpl Syx
Cheers for the reverts! :) Cpl Syx [talk] 00:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
IRC invitation
Because I have noticed you commenting at the current RfC regarding Pending Changes, I wanted to invite you to the IRC channel for pending changes. If you are not customarily logged into the IRC, use this link. This under used resource can allow real time discussion at this particularly timely venture of the trial known as Pending Changes. Even if nothing can come from debating points there, at least this invitation is delivered with the best of intentions and good faith expectations. Kind regards. My76Strat 08:32, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Arch / usernames
Heh; yes, sorry about the 'rapid archiving'. I was moving old threads to keep the size down, and it seemed kinda 'done'. But also, possibly, I was trying to avoid the ongoing "you should be an admin" stuff! I mean...yes, it'd be useful if I was, but I'm just not certain I can handle the drama of it; also, whether I can be bothered to go through all my contribs and dig up all the necessary things (to show I've done so-many-hundred AFC's, so-many-hundred username reports) and getting good examples together. I really should, but mostly I don't because I find something better/more interesting to do. Chzz ► 16:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Ohio Interstates map
Morning. Just added the source and date for the Ohio Interstate map as requested in the peer review. Would have marked it there, but it wouldn't format right. 25or6to4 (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Admin Mentoring...
Thank you for your patience!
I apologise for the delay in responding to your last replies - I didn't expect it to be that long before I could do so!
I was on holiday from work, and ironically had less time on Wikipedia - family stuff, which I normally can't do as I work at night and sleep during the day! - and then work has been hectic!
Thankfully I have a night off tonight (but will be working the next 6 nights), so I have responded to your answers, and left some more questions.
I have been impressed with your answers so far - you seem to be putting in some thought to it, which is good to see!
I might not get to respond again for almost a week, as I said I'm working 6 nights, but personally I think it's going well, even if slower than we might initially have thought!
Regards, PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 01:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- (responding in order)
- That's fine, I don't mind waiting!
- Yuck...night shift.
:/
- Thank you! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Citadel of Damascus
Hi. Can you put this on hold as the writer has some improvements to make still.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:55, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- That's fine! I can wait! Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your support!
Hi Reaper,
You were the first user to support me in my RfA and you were the first to congratulate me on its success. Considering that I don't recall interacting with you on Wikipedia before, I am very grateful for your confidence in me.
Happy editing,
Neelix (talk) 21:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Adopt me
Hi Reaper Eternal, can you "adopt" me? Secrets floating in the sea (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Certainly! I'd be happy to adopt you! :) I'm just interested in one thing though: What would you like to do? There are many things you can do here, such as fixing grammar mistakes in articles, adding reliable sources to unsourced statements in articles, or adding information to articles that interest you. Additionally, what are your interests, as it is a lot more fun to edit articles that interest you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I see these orange boxes on top of articles saying "this article needs references." I would like to fix that. or something I just found that sounds easy, "wikifying". --Secrets floating in the sea (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Oops, my "edit summary" (whatever it's called) said "ew" I meant "re". Secrets floating in the sea (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I enjoy wikifying articles too! You can see a list of them at Category:Articles that need to be wikified. The way you wikify articles is by adding relevant internal links to other Wikipedia pages, and you add them by doing just what you did above: adding
[[ ]]
characters around the word that needs to be linked. However, just one note: you don't need to link common words like "finger", and you don't commonly need to link them more than once. And don't worry about typos in the edit summary, everybody messes up now and then. (I once typed the "re", which is short for "reply" as "er".) Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:13, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I enjoy wikifying articles too! You can see a list of them at Category:Articles that need to be wikified. The way you wikify articles is by adding relevant internal links to other Wikipedia pages, and you add them by doing just what you did above: adding
- Oops, my "edit summary" (whatever it's called) said "ew" I meant "re". Secrets floating in the sea (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I see these orange boxes on top of articles saying "this article needs references." I would like to fix that. or something I just found that sounds easy, "wikifying". --Secrets floating in the sea (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for wasting an hour of my time, sockpuppet. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:04, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Texas Chain Saw Massacre
Hi Reaper, and thank you for participating in the GOCE Backlog elimination drive again this month. I just wanted to let you know that articles from the Requests page count double only for the basic barnstar, and not for the leader board or for a 10-k rather than a 5-k article. Thanks for taking this article; I have edited it many times so fresh eyes are needed. It was very close to passing FA last time. --Diannaa (Talk) 02:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for letting me know! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:52, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for copy editing the article. IF it's possible, could you voice any other issues that you see on the FAC page (if there are any)? As of right now, it's stalling because only one person, other than myself, has really said anything and they are threatening to close for inactivity. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:00, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Barrons
Thanks for taking on the review. If you're still up, I've replied to a few of your points on the review page. I'll see what I can do about the paragraphs at a more sociable hour. Btw, do you mind my asking roughly where you are? Feel free to take the conversation off-wiki, but you might not be too far from my neck of the woods. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- In the sort-of-rural suburbs of the city of Cincinnati with its wonderful ISP www.fuse.net and the wonderful neighborhood of Over-the-Rhine. (I'm across the ocean
;)
.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)- You have a curious interest in Somerset for someone who's thousands of miles away... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- And, while I'm here, I've reworked some of the paragraphs on Barrons. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look when you get a minute. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- Heheh, my ancestors came from Somerset, Northern Scotland, and Ireland. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:06, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Done - Passed as GA! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:06, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- Very much obliged. If you want a slightly easier review to log for the drive, I have another military biography waiting for a review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- It appears somebody already reviewed it.
;)
Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- It appears somebody already reviewed it.
- Very much obliged. If you want a slightly easier review to log for the drive, I have another military biography waiting for a review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- And, while I'm here, I've reworked some of the paragraphs on Barrons. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look when you get a minute. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- You have a curious interest in Somerset for someone who's thousands of miles away... HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
I Am... Sasha Fierce
Reaper, i hope you still remember me. I am Jivesh. You have copy-edited a bunch of articles for me in late 2010. I really need you help this with I Am... Sasha Fierce. The article needs a nice c/e for sections "Release", "Promotion", "Critical Reception", "Accolades" and "Commercial performance". Please do not let me down. I came to you with lots of hope. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I'll do it now! (I had a bunch of other things that needed doing, so I'm a little late, but I hope you don't mind!) Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
- No. Thank you for having started the work. Jivesh • Talk2Me 19:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Done - How do you like it? Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Reaper, thank you wholeheartedly. You made me so happy. You did a flawless job. Thank you once again, especially for having formatted the reference. Can i nominate it for GA now? Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:43, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- No. Thank you for having started the work. Jivesh • Talk2Me 19:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Spare time to compare a photo?
If you have a minute could you please take a quick look at the pic under the heading "Stratford" at [1] and compare with [2].
I think that they are the same photo but one is a cropped version of the other. I have concerns because all of the photos at University of East London display the characteristics of having been taken by a professional and the person who is claiming ownership of most of them on Commons is an editor who, until my recent work, appears to have committed numerous copyvios in that article. Of course, the editor in question could be a pro photographer but the tone of language used by him/her suggests to me that s/he is a student there (eg: the person left a msg on my talk page - User_talk:Sitush#What_the_hell_are_you_doing.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21.21
UEL claim copyright so even if the editor did take the thing, and UEL used a cropped version, then it is a bit worrying to me, AGF or no AGF.
Thanks - Sitush (talk) 16:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'd talk to somebody more knowledgeable than myself. I can agree that those to images are part of the same image, but I don't know how to check for a copyvio, and I don't even know if both images weren't ripped off some third, undisclosed source. You should probably ask User:Moonriddengirl or User:VernoWhitney for advice. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:13, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- That's fine, thanks. I'm clueless about what the options and implications (if any) are here & will refer to the users you mention. - Sitush (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Being sorted now. Bulk delete being proposed and she has been blocked from Commons. I can't get an ambulance as fast as this. - Sitush (talk) 19:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Doh
See [3] - edit summary should explain it, I hope!. Thanks! Chzz ► 18:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Haha! I thought it was the newbie! :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your message
Hey Reaper Eternal - Thanks for help. Yeah, you're spot on. The difference between "no context" and "no content" might arguably be seen as a very minimal... but I should still have known better. Thanks again! --Shirt58 (talk) 11:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- That's fine! Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
caption for pic on List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset
Thanks for responding to my issues on List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset. Just one initial question what makes you think the lead image was taken from a plane?— Rod talk 16:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed. I had initially thought it looked like it had been taken from high up in the air; thanks for catching that! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Lupin/Badwords
Hey, I can't edit this file because it is either protected or sprotected, but your recent edit is causing some problems when I run Lupin's script (warnings about lines 730-740 ish on startup, but seems to work fine after). Names are hard to think of (talk) 20:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- Somebody else already fixed it. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello Reaper, I just reviewed another one of your GA nominations, which was Cirrus cloud. You will need only a small amount of revisions before it meets the GA criteria, IMO.--12george1 (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
GAN Citadel of Damascus
Hi Reaper Eternal, Citadel of Damascus is more or less complete now. So as far as I am concerned, bring it on! ;) -- Zoeperkoe (talk) 05:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
François Asselineau
Hello, I saw that you add a "refimproveBLP" flag on François Asselineau's article even though the sources are all coming from most famous French Newspapers such as Les_Échos_(France), Libération, Le Monde, Le Parisien and Le Figaro. I don't understand how they can be considered "unreliable" as the flag is explaining. --Lawren00 (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
- They are not unreliable. The tag is there since the entire "Personal life" section is unreferenced. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:06, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
All right, I added the reference in the "Personal Life". It was mentioned in many of the references, so I just picked up one and did a multiple citations of the same reference. Thank you for your help --Lawren00 (talk) 23:32, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify's March Mini Drive
WikiProject Wikify's March Mini! Hello, I thought you would be interested in the March Mini, a coordinated effort by WikiProject Wikify members to eliminate the 2008 backlog of articles tagged with {{wikify}} and/or {{dead end}}. Come join in the fun! There are only three prizes to be won, including a special barnstar created just for this drive! Regards, |
![]() |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 04:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC).
Thanks for tidying up my clumsy attempt to make a disambig page. I had intended it as a redirect page and realised too late that it should have been a disambig. Thanks again.--Storye book (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I try to clean up the new pages that flow in—tagging the bad ones for deletion and fixing up the good ones. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Please take a look at Talk:Pat_Tillman#Hew_to_the_source and chime in on the discussion as to how the "Offensive material" guidelines apply. The disagreement is whether the word fucking is germane to the section in question or whether it is gratuitous and therefore in opposition to this guideline. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- Replied on the talk page that the word "fucking" should be included in the quote from Pat's brother. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Prehistoric Mammals
Why might this qualify for speedy deletion? What is wrong with it?Pinguinus (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- I moved the page to Wikipedia space, since that is the location for all WikiProjects. The page has been moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Prehistoric Mammals, and I tagged the resulting redirect for speedy deletion. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- I see. Thank you for your assistance.Pinguinus (talk) 21:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- I see. Thank you for your assistance.Pinguinus (talk) 21:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Re. Pat Tillman, and the quotation/censorship debate,
In order to clarify, I am asking users to briefly, clearly state which version of the quotation they support or oppose.
Please see Talk:Pat_Tillman#Clarifying_for_consensus
I am sending this message to everyone who has previously participated in the discussion; I do not wish to make any assumptions of the previous opinion.
I want to show clear consensus, so the issue can be resolved and edit-warring can be prevented.
Thanks,
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Chzz (talk) at 00:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC).
Thank you, a much better solution than my redirect.Paste Let’s have a chat. 18:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- That's fine! I move userpages created in article space to their userpages, then leave a note explaining what I did on their talk pages. I then tag the resulting redirect for
{{db-r2}}
. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:40, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
My editor review
I've given a (somewhat lengthy) response to your review of me. I very much appreciate your feedback; there were a couple things I clarified in my response that may slightly sway your opinion. Thanks again!! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:09, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
re: redirects to Pi
In an RfD discussion, you asked "Out of curiosity, then, why don't we have the numbers between these two, such as 3.141592653589793238462643383279503 or 3.1415926535897932384626433832795029?"
If I had to guess, it's because of the quirky "magic" of round numbers. The first redirect has 35 digits after the decimal. The second has 30 digits including the three. Somebody probably did type those numbers in somewhere - either in an old article page or on some external webpage and someone else thought that they were significant enough to link.
Of course, that begs the question why there aren't variations at 25 digits, 45 digits, etc. The answer there (I hope) is that experienced editors continue to quietly coach new users that, while it's not deletable, it's generally unnecessary and that they should focus their editing time on other things. As you know, deletion of a contribution that you think you made in good faith is a pretty harsh introduction to the project. Turning marginal pages into redirects and tolerating marginal redirects is part of a softer approach. At least, that's my opinion...
Hope that helps. Rossami (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ahhh, I see then; it is per WP:BITE. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
TCM copy edit
I remember seeing that you did a copy edit on The Texas Chain Saw Massacre for its current FAC. One of the delegates is saying that the article is still "buggy" and wants to keep it open a little longer to have these issues addressed. Would it be possible for you to do another quick pass over it (I think there were edits since yours that corrupted the consistency in the writing) again? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 02:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- It'd be great if you could, not sure why the delegate feels the article is still buggy, but I don't think it's anything major. Thanks, --Tærkast (Communicate) 20:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) (I was actually replying to this!) I will get on it! Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! I really dunno what's going to happen with this FA, most support, those who don't, ah well, some of the concerns I don't really agree with but, that's FA for you. Once again, thanks!--Tærkast (Communicate) 14:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I don't understand the complaint about the use of the word "film". The only words usable are: "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre", "film", and "it"! "Movie" and "show" are imprecise. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! I really dunno what's going to happen with this FA, most support, those who don't, ah well, some of the concerns I don't really agree with but, that's FA for you. Once again, thanks!--Tærkast (Communicate) 14:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
for your message and your support. Just installed Twinkle and trying to work out what some of it does without having a disaster. ("15,000 edits and never used a tool - probably has to wind his computer up every day...") Have retreated into my cave for one or two days to digest all the policies I've been reading. Or forget them again... Peridon (talk) 23:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- Heheh! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:04, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
GOCE / Mid-drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 backlog elimination drive
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 Backlog elimination drive! Here is your mid-drive newsletter.
![]() So far, 79 people have signed up for this drive. Of these, 64 have participated. Interest is high due to a link to our event from the Watchlist page, and many new and first-time copy editors have joined us for the drive. If you signed up for the drive but haven't participated yet, it's not too late! Try to copy edit at least a few articles. Remember, if you have rollover words from the last drive, you will lose them if you do not participate in this drive. If you haven't signed up for the drive yet, you can sign up now. Many thanks to those editors who have been helping out at the Requests page. We have assisted in the promotion of seven articles to Good article status so far this month.
We have already achieved our target of reducing the overall backlog by 10%; however, we have more work to do with the 2009 backlog. We have almost eliminated May 2009 and we only have some 700 articles left from 2009. It is excellent progress, so let's concentrate our fire power on the remaining months from 2009. Thank you for participating in the March 2011 drive. We anticipate it will be another big success!
The UtahraptorTalk to me has decided to step down from his position as project coordinator due to real-life issues. Your drive coordinators – S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk) and Tea with toast (Talk) |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 04:47, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Question about company entry
Hello. I hope you are well, and that you can help. I work for a company called GDS International. We have a page on Wikipedia that I recently updated to reflect changes at the company. The page was created by someone at GDS a while ago, and they no longer work here (hence I have no-one to ask, and why I am contacting you). I removed a paragraph at the bottom of the page that related to a court case against GDS for 'sexual and racial discrimination'. And another contributor has added it again. My question is this: the case was thrown out of court, but this was not reported (the allegations being far more 'newsworthy' than the reality). Therefore, I cannot provide a counter reference. I'm not sure that the story is relevant to GDS anyway, but I know the contributor in question and know he has an axe to grind with the company. That's fair enough (and outside the point of this question). What can I do? Can I remove the paragraph in question? Or should I rewrite it so that it is correct, but lacking a key reference? Thank you for your time and attention. Bristolstaff (talk) 16:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
- I have removed the poorly-sourced information in the controversy section as YouTube and somebody's personal blog are not reliable sources. I have also removed mention of the lawsuit as the New York Post was the only news outlet that mentioned it, and it was covered in a highly sensationalist, tabloid-style manner. (The New York Post has been noted for this type of journalism.)
- However, there are some things I would like to point out. It appears that you are trying to promote GDS International, and I have had to clean up some of the language used. As you mentioned, you work for the company, and thus you have a conflict-of-interest when it comes to editing that article. Wikipedia strongly discourages people from editing where they have a conflict-of-interest, as it tends to introduce biases into the article. Additionally, as the tags at the top of the article point out, the article may not be notable per WP:CORP.
- Finally, your username does not meet Wikipedia's username policy, as it implies that your account is used by a group of people, and this is not allowed. Thus I would encourage you to follow the instructions outlined at Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple to change your username to a username that represents only you.
- Sorry to throw so many links at you, and, after your username is changed, I encourage you to continue editing other articles! It's fun! Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
GAN Citadel of Damascus 2
Hi, do you know when you intend to do the review? I am asking because I have books from the library that I might need if I need to make any changes, but if you're not planning on doing it any time soon, I'll just return them. -- Zoeperkoe (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- I will start it today. Since you were not ready when I had planned on starting the review (that's fine!), I went ahead and reviewed somebody else's GAN. I should be back soon with my review! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- Cool! I didn't want to rush you, but this is my most ambitious GAN to date so I am obviously interested to see how it turns out! -- Zoeperkoe (talk) 15:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:35, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Music
Thank you so much sir for your help. Now its clear that i need more informations. I'm actually new here, I created my account a few hours ago and its my first time to create a page. I did some more edits and I'm also needing help on how am I going to know if the the when that speed nomination will be removed? or how can i remove it with out violating anything. Im sorry i just need to know. Actually im not done with the article but I put some more informations to make it more notable. I just need an advise sir. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misskoto (talk • contribs) 17:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you so much sir for your help. Now its clear that i need more informations. I'm actually new here, I created my account a few hours ago and its my first time to create a page. I did some more edits and I'm also needing help on how am I going to know if the the when that speed nomination will be removed? or how can i remove it with out violating anything. Im sorry i just need to know. Actually im not done with the article but I put some more informations to make it more notable. I just need an advise sir. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misskoto (talk • contribs) 17:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Ball lightning
Good day! I need an advise of you. I tried add an external link in article ball lightning. This link was such: Videos Films, depicting the fireballs (in Russian). It was deleted. I tried to explain my position at Talk:Ball lightning in section About two new external links. During Revision as of 19:28, 17 March 2011 (edit) Daffydavid changed the link to the form: Video of Ball Lightning,Lightball Video Two amateur videos of suspected Ball Lightning. The videos also are available in zip-archive, and may be seen with the help of VLC media player.
But then Beach drifter deleted the link. Moreover at 20 March 2011 he deleted also this information:
- Fedosin S.G. and Kim A.S. proposed (2000) Electron-ionic model.[1] ,
which was in section Other hypotheses. Now I don't know what to do in such situation. Fedosin (talk) 07:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- The video links that you wish to add are discouraged by Wikipedia's policy on linking to sites you own due to the inevitable conflict-of-interest. Additionally, linking to rich media content is discouraged because many users cannot see the content, and the videos may also qualify as original research. The other link was removed because Beach drifter considered it to be irrelevant.
- I would strongly encourage you to read Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest guideline, particularly the section on citing yourself, to understand why many editors will be particularly averse to you adding the links. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:16, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks for explanation.
Fedosin (talk) 16:55, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Govind_Kumar_Singh
Hi, I notice that you tried to help out User:Wnfck on the above article. I've now restored it to the state it was a few hours ago after my clean up edits. The contributor you were helping had basically added back all the dross I had removed, including ridiculous number of sections etc. Hope this is ok. I'm now going to tag it for citations. - Sitush (talk) 19:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, the help was for Vermapriya1986 (talk · contribs). It's fine to revert my edits, though. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, now I suspect that user (Vermapriya) may have COI. I've had a word about this with them. - Sitush (talk) 19:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
Hi.
Hi. My name is Bobby. I live in New Orleans. Wanna come see me? It's lonely out here! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Needforediting4321 (talk • contribs) 18:04, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Jealous
I never get invitations like that... I deleted Monica as vandalism, not nonsense. Nonsense is a bit more specific at WP than in everyday life. Even some surrealist poetry would pass the nonsense test. Something like "Squoog de flagles sinooot pan ve hutxer" wouldn't, once you'd checked to see if it were some obscure language from the Rhodope mountains. (If the more interesting words don't come up on Google, it won't be...) Keep up the good work. (Second thoughts: Is Bobby M or F? Lonely in New Orleans?!?) Peridon (talk) 20:55, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not certain what you are refering to. I checked my CSD log (it's useful for letting me know whether my speedies are declined or not!), and I cannot find any "Monica" page. Would you please link to it, as I cannot see my own deleted contributions? Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:03, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- Monica; thethirdreel was the one. Teen drivel. (Should be a csd category for it as such. Or am I just feeling hungry?) Peridon (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- From the talk page of the creator, it appears that I was not the person who tagged it (see User talk:Miss-fittz). (BTW, you forgot to delete the talk page.)
;)
Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)- My apologies - you reverted something. Ignore all that, delete it or preserve it as an example of the fallibility of admins. Should have known you wouldn't make that mistake. Talk page deleted now. Peridon (talk) 21:16, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
- From the talk page of the creator, it appears that I was not the person who tagged it (see User talk:Miss-fittz). (BTW, you forgot to delete the talk page.)
- Monica; thethirdreel was the one. Teen drivel. (Should be a csd category for it as such. Or am I just feeling hungry?) Peridon (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Task force
Pursuing the task force idea ... would you be interested in participating, and if so, would it be possible for you to round up some people who share your views and keep in touch with them as the task force makes recommendations? - Dank (push to talk) 21:05, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Deletion of content
Hundred of Hoo website
The source is a national newspaper which clearly names the school additionally a local paper carriers the same story. http://www.kentonline.co.uk/medway_messenger/news/2011/march/21/teacher_arrested.aspx What additional evidence would be required? Moz1992 (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
- The affair was alleged, and in the article it was being passed off as if it were known fact. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:34, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Again Vandalism on my user page Help me please
Dear Brother,
I am very disappointed due to this act of vandalism on my user page, after the help of User:JamesBWatsonyour who semi protected my user page I was very happy and satisfied that now I can write and edit Wikipedia articles but few days ago some one vandalized my user page again I want to report this user User:Sajjadhunzai to be deleted as he insulted me by typing given below comments on my main user page due to these comments few people in my social circle insulted me I was never encourage to write for Wikipedia but still i keep writing for Wiki but these comments honestly made me grief, I am too sad honestly therefore I would like to request with you to BLOCK this user because if he can leave these comments on my main user page he can do this with everyone and please Full protect my page please so I and Admins only can edit my user page because I love this place and I am Wikipedia addicted now he insulted and disrespect me with given below comments which he wrote on my user name kindly tell me IS it good?
below is the story of RETARDED PERSON, please join me in saying a BIG LOL :)))
THIS GUY NEEDS SOME SERIOUS HELP, HIS ENGLISH IS TOO HARD FOR ME TO UNDERSTAND, BUT GOOD SCRIPT TO MAKE ME LAUGH AFTER WORK
I will be very helpful to you if you help me to protect my own page which is my property and honestly help me in this major concern because it’s not only my insult but also insult of all wikipedians.
Yours Truly,
Wikipedian --Faizanalivarya (talk) 03:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- JamesBWatson blocked the other account for a month. Anyway, I would ignore the attacks of vandals, as they show up to disrupt userpages every now and then, and report them to WP:AIV if it gets bad.
- Also, I am not a sysop, so I cannot protect your userpage or block vandals. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the review!--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 16:07, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Translation
A cheat I use at times is to Google for a short bit, then look at where the blogs/Facebooks are from... A not bad translator is http://www.freetranslation.com/ (but even that won't do Marathi). Get it to translate, then use the Google translate link on it for a check. Peridon (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to ask some questions about the endorsements idea without distracting from the "Eureka" thread ... I've posted a question on this temporary talk page. Thanks. - Dank (push to talk) 00:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK! Watchlisted. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks...
...for doing this. Didn't know I was supposed to do that. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • Coor. Online Amb'dor • 17:44, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I'm sorry, but I had to oppose your RFA based on your relatively recent drama-ish nature. I think that maybe 4-6 months of staying mostly away from ANI would help you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:40, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
You're fast
You beat me out in reporting User:Blackpplsmell to UAA. Fast work! --NellieBly (talk) 01:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset
Could you take another look at List of hill forts and ancient settlements in Somerset. It is getting close to FLC but there are a few queries/outstanding issues on the Talk page I'd appreciate your help with or comment on.— Rod talk 12:10, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Tofutwitch
Tofu's sock block was very short, and based entirely on circumstantial evidence and IMO he was blocked just in case he were a sock. His explanations were reasonable, and I personally believe that he would be the last person to do something so silly. RfA is not the place to discuss other editors, and that's one of the reasons we are currently working seriously now towards a reform of the process. --Kudpung (talk) 03:16, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I had already been planning on redacting my unnecessary comments the next time I got online, before I had even seen this post. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
5W Public Relations
Please review 5W_Public_Relations years of comments and discussions being ignored by user: Ravpapa. Pls assist on talk or in edits. Emetemet13 (talk) 22:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Just a friendly reminder that you posted here :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Links for Andrea Elizabeth Michaels
Dear Reaper Eternal: I left you a message on my talk page in response to your comment to me about 0 links on the above page. Please read and respond when you have time. Thank you! Cmckibben (talk) 20:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
Munger
You are welcome to tell us about Munger's theories in greater detail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 12:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Look at this. It appears that Charlie Munger did coin the term "Lollapalooza Effect", and I will go source it now. In any event, adding "Who wrote this stupid drivel?" to an article constitutes vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
(moved from above)
do you work for wikipedia or your are a volunteer? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schidlow (talk • contribs) 02:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- I volunteer, as do most of the people here. :) Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Your vandalism revert didn't catch it all
Thanks for your effort in making this revert of vandalism. Unfortunately, you only caught the last three vandalist edits and missed the one before those three, probably because it was done by a different editor. Please take a look at the edit history when reverting vandalism. Many times, multiple edits by different anon IP editors indicate vandalism by multiple editors. In such cases, simple "Undo" of the most recent vandal doesn't get rid of all the vandalism. Thanks for your vigilance and keep up the good work. --Pseudo-Richard (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Yes, that is because I use antivandalism tools (in this case STiki), and they only show the most recent diff, not the edits beforehand or the edit history. Multiple IP edits are normally not an indication of multiple vandalism, except in /b/ raids or when the IPs are from the same subnet—an IP-hopping vandal. I know about undo, but I only use rollback since it is much quicker and easier. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:07, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 backlog elimination drive report
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors March 2011 Backlog elimination drive. Thank you for participating in the March 2011 drive! This newsletter summarizes the March drive and other recent events.
![]() There were 99 signups for the drive; of these, 70 participated. Interest was high mainly due to a link to our event from the Watchlist page. We had a record-breaking 84 articles listed on the Requests page in March; 11 of these have been promoted to Good article status so far. Several of our recent efforts have received Featured Article status as well, and the GOCE is becoming a solid resource for the Wikipedia community. Many thanks to editors who have been helping out at the Requests page and by copy editing articles from the backlog.
Remarkable progress was made in reducing the backlog this month, as we now have fewer than 500 articles remaining from 2009. We are well under the 4,000-article mark for the total number remaining in the queue. Since our backlog drives began in May 2010 with 8,323 articles, we have cleared more than 53% of the backlog. A complete list of results and barnstars awarded can be found here. Barnstars will be distributed over the next week. If you enjoyed participating in our event, you may also like to join the Wikification drives, which are held on alternate months to our drives. Their April drive has started.
On March 21, SMasters appointed Chaosdruid (talk) and Torchiest (talk) as Guild coordinators to serve in place of The Utahraptor, who recently stepped down. Please feel free to contact any coordinator if you have any questions or need assistance. Your drive coordinators – S Masters (talk), Diannaa (Talk) and Tea with toast (Talk) |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 14:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Work It Out (Beyoncé Knowles song)
Hi Reaper. Can you please copy-edit "Work It Out (Beyoncé Knowles song)". Please do it or else it will fail GA. The GA review may give you an idea of what needs to be done. Please. Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:36, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:32, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- So can i ask the reviewer (Jezhotwells) to do it? He failed the GA just because of that. Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:48, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- No you can't make the GA reviewer copyedit the article. I regularly do, but that is just a courtesy for the nominator.
- BTW, maybe I should have rewritten the prose after the content was all changed. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Will you be able to do it now? I mean it does not matter if the article has already failed. It can be re-nominated. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:41, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- So can i ask the reviewer (Jezhotwells) to do it? He failed the GA just because of that. Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:48, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:41, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Haha nice
You got me with the "You have new messages" bar. Sweet user page too. :) BurtAlert (talk) 02:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Haha, thanks! I had just gone to somebody's userpage when the bar popped up concerning this edit, and I had to hover over the link using popups before I was willing to click it! You can copy the bar if you want. Reaper Eternal (talk | contribs | block) 02:22, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Nice one on your user page. I will copy your bar. :) SMasters (talk) 05:53, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Got me, too! Love the user page as well. Clever :o) Pesky (talk) 07:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Glad you guys liked it! ;) Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Got me, too! Love the user page as well. Clever :o) Pesky (talk) 07:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
D'arcy Wretzky
Hi, as a sporadic contributator I'm not so familiar with Wikipedia's policies and such, but I've seen you're willing to offer editor assistance, so I've chosen to contact you. Would you be able to keep an eye on the article about D'arcy Wretzky? There seems to be some very subtle vandalism by an IP editor. Maybe the page could be protected for a while or something like that.
Here are the edits I'm talking about.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D%27arcy_Wretzky&diff=next&oldid=421609100
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D%27arcy_Wretzky&diff=next&oldid=421610004
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D%27arcy_Wretzky&diff=next&oldid=421627355
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=D%27arcy_Wretzky&diff=prev&oldid=421927406
Obviously John Shanahan has nothing to do with Joe Shanahan. Likewise it's well-known that D'arcy mostly played a Jazz Bass.
Best regards! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.49.244.252 (talk) 07:14, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'll keep an eye on the page. However, the content in question appears to be poorly sourced. Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you. I think you mean the question about the bass type is poorly sourced. In this case I have to agree reluctantly. Nevertheless the Jazz Bass seems to be mentioned in the article for some time and it's also the type of instrument that can be seen in countless pictures and videos around the net. The info on Joe Shanahan can be sourced in this release though: http://www.discogs.com/Smashing-Pumpkins-Fully-Illustrated-Book-Interview-Disc-The-Unauthorised-Edition/release/1910746 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.181.211.153 (talk) 05:32, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
March 2011 Copy Edit Drive Awards
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
For copy editing the most articles on the first day of the March 2011 GOCE Backlog Elmination Drive (an amazing 21!), I present Reaper Eternal with the Original Barnstar. Way to come roaring out of the gate! —Torchiest talkedits 04:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
For copy editing during the March 2011 GOCE Backlog Elmination Drive totaling over 12,000 words, I present Reaper Eternal with this barnstar. Nice work! —Torchiest talkedits 04:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Troller derby
The Userpage Shield | ||
Thanks for spanking the troll off my userpage! Cheers—Binksternet (talk) 03:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC) |
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:34, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Yay!
I've been attacked by Zsfgseg (talk · contribs)! Must mean I'm doing a good job here. Seriously though, thanks for the talk page revert. --Dylan620 (t • c) 00:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
hello
this is from the berendale school student,can we aloow to fix the page what every user did? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.45.119.21 (talk) 04:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I don't know what you mean. Yes, you are allowed to edit. No, you may not vandalize. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Edit test cleanup bot
Hi there. I have started a discussion at the Village Pump regarding a proposed bot that would clean up the "example.jpg"-type edit tests discussed in edit filter discussion you initiated. Your input is invited! 28bytes (talk) 17:26, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Steven_L._Newman
Hi, I've just reverted Steven_L._Newman due to some weird edits since your own last reversion. However, I have also commented out a section that I feel is grossly POV/unencyclopedic in its wording. I don't know anything about this guy or his company & so am a little reluctant to try to fix the issue, although there is a cite there. Suspect that you may have been just hosing down the flames yourself but if not then might you check it out please? - Sitush (talk) 06:00, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Sexy Slang
Hi Reaper Eternal! Thank you for responding to my "Help". I have added sources and I wanted you to please check as to whether they are considered reliable being that one is from an interview (although one party is a news channel). Thanks! Sampack (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Hi! Joe Decker's advice on your talk page is good! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for your participation in the March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/94/Symbol_support_vote.svg/70px-Symbol_support_vote.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/20/2011_GAN_drive.png/350px-2011_GAN_drive.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/2011_GAN_elimination_drive_results.png/300px-2011_GAN_elimination_drive_results.png)
On behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, we would like to take the time and thank you for your contributions made as part of the March 2011 Good articles backlog elimination drive. Awards and barnstars will go out shortly for those who have reviewed a certain number of articles.
During the backlog drive, in the month of March 2011,
- 522 GA nominations were undertaken.
- 423 GA nominations passed.
- 72 GA nominations failed.
- 27 GA nominations were on hold.
We started the GA backlog elimination drive with 378 GA nominations remaining, with 291 that were not reviewed at all. By 2:00, April 1, 2011, the backlog was at 171 GA nominations, with 100 that were left unreviewed.
At the start of the drive, the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 101 days (Andrei Kirilenko (politician), at 20 November 2010, reviewed and passed 1 March 2011); at the end of the drive the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 39 days (Gery Chico, at 24 February 2011, still yet to be reviewed as of this posting).
While we did not achieve the objective of getting the backlog of outstanding GA nominations down to below 50, we reduced the GA backlog by over half. The GA reviews also seemed to be of a higher quality and have consistently led, to say the least, to marginal improvements to those articles (although there were significant improvements to many, even on the some of the nominations that were failed).
If you would like to comment on the drive itself and maybe even make suggestions on how to improve the next one, please make a comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/March 2011#Feedback. Another GA backlog elimination drive is being planned for later this year, tentatively for September or October 2011. Also, if you have any comments or remarks on how to improve the Good article process in general, Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles can always use some feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles.
Again, on behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, thank you for making the March 2011 GA backlog elimination drive a success.
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:51, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Ellie Goulding singles discussion
I would appreciate it if you took part in this discussion about the deletion of all of the articles of Ellie Goulding's singles. Thank you so much! ℥nding·start 00:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- It is not a good idea to canvass the talk pages of people who you know will agree with you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:48, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
U r a great wikipedian
and remember if u get congratulated by a vandal u must b doing something wrong. 190.51.165.24 (talk) 13:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Requesting a copy-edit
Hello, I was wondering if you could help me with a copy-edit on the article Halo (Beyoncé Knowles song). It is currently at FAC, and well some people oppose in articles as soon as possible, and was recently opposed because it needs a copy-edit. Time ago, you helped Jivesh with one at Ego (Beyoncé Knowles song), so I thought you may help me here too. I am not hurry with this, Halo's 3rd FAC will always be there, won't it? So if you are busy, would you recommend me another GOCE? Thank you so much. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 02:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'll get on it in the morning, as I was just heading to bed! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:47, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, and sorry. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 02:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I really cannot manage to get this done within a reasonable time. Classes, homework, and things of that nature are preventing me from getting a good solid couple hours to really go through it to prepare it for FAC. Maybe another GoCE editor would be available. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- OK, any quick recommendation (a personal recommendation to avoid to list it a GOCE). Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 03:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- OK, I've gotten the initial run done. I'll be back in a couple hours to re-review my edits and clean up any more. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- OK, any quick recommendation (a personal recommendation to avoid to list it a GOCE). Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 03:47, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I really cannot manage to get this done within a reasonable time. Classes, homework, and things of that nature are preventing me from getting a good solid couple hours to really go through it to prepare it for FAC. Maybe another GoCE editor would be available. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:27, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, and sorry. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 02:50, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Oh well, its FAC was closed by the most disruptive FA director. So, it is not needed for pressuring you. If you want to continue copy-editing, you are mostly welcome. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 03:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Need Help
I need to put info on a page but u keep deleting my info —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.199.5.233 (talk) 02:44, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- With this edit, you added an unsourced claim of being gay. Per the biography of living persons policy, any such claim MUST have reliable sources to back it up. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- i have a video of the fox 5 interview... would that help? how can i post it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.199.5.233 (talk) 02:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- You can source it to the Fox interview by adding the content with a citation to the interview (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for how to create a citation/reference). Be sure to include a link to the video in your reference too, so other people can verify what you wrote. Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- i have a video of the fox 5 interview... would that help? how can i post it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.199.5.233 (talk) 02:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Thanks(:::::::::::: <3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.199.5.233 (talk) 02:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- You're welcome. :) (By the way, please sign your posts with ~~~~ when posting on talk pages.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:57, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
I apologise
I apologise for accidental reverting of your revert of vandalism of the Battle of Stalingrad article. I didn't noticed initially that you reverted a vandal. Sorry about that.--Paul Siebert (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- That's fine! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- ^ Fedosin S.G., Kim A.S. The Physical Theory of Ball Lightning. Applied Physics , No. 1, 2001, P. 69 – 87; Electron-ionic model of ball lightning