User talk:Relzap

Welcome!

Hello, Relzap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Yakov M. Rabkin. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 20:54, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please do not use Wikipedia for editorializing . Ad Orientem (talk) 00:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

← ZScarpia 02:36, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Renewal of DS alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 15:59, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have repeated this alert as they must be less than 12 months old and the last one had expired. Edits like this are against our neutrality policy. This area is particularly divisive and under discretionary sanctions. Please try to write from a neutral tone and if you think an edit may be controversial seek consensus for it on the talk page first. Repeated disruption can result in a topic ban from the area. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 16:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Max Blumenthal

Your edits at that page violate a number of Wikipedia policies, notably WP:NPOV, WP:RS, and WP:BLP. More pertinently, it violates an arbitration decision that prohibits accounts with less than 500 edits from editing in the Arab-Israeli topic area, see WP:ARBPIA3#500/30. Please feel free to edit other topic areas on Wikipedia so that you can get more accustomed to the editing policies here. If you continue to edit this topic area you may be reported and potentially blocked from editing. Thank you. nableezy - 21:28, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone kept erasing factual sections from this page and would not allow for well-established information to be put in Can someone make sure that the integrity of this page is kept and that its not just a propaganda page?

The sections being erased are not factual, they are polemic and based on sources not suitable for a biography of a living person on this website. Further, your account may not edit in the Arab-Israeli topic area as you do not meet the requirements of 500 edits and 30 days tenure. Please do not continue editing in this topic area until you have reached those requirements and please familiarize yourself with the content policies of Wikipedia, such as WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:OR, and WP:BLP. Thank you. nableezy - 22:16, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Max Blumenthal Elie Wiesel Affair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Max Blumenthal Elie Wiesel Affair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Blumenthal Elie Wiesel Affair until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Dream out loud (talk) 22:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Max Blumenthal Elie Wiesel Affair

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Max Blumenthal Elie Wiesel Affair, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Max Blumenthal. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Max Blumenthal, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not vandalize my user page again, as you did with this edit. Vandalism will lead to your being blocked from editing. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 15:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't vandalize it

I just posted the information that seems to make you biased and unqualified to make decisions about Max Blumenthal's page considering the fact that you are ideologically aligned with him and thus defend him

Please don't use Wikipedia as a propaganda platform or I will make sure that you are removed.

I replied to your rant on my talk page. Do not threaten to "have me removed" when it's clear you don't know what you're talking about. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:07, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]