User talk:ReyBrujo/Archive 12
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
PC Engine/Turbografx16 external link page
ooookkkk,i'll be good,i promise12scolsrud 01:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi ReyBrujo, You've kept removing my site from the external link page on the PC Engine/Turbografx16 page and I still wonder why. You mention that it is a new site. But the site is well active and has been around for 4 years now with 260 games reviewed for the system and thousand of screenshots and scans. You adviced to post a message on the discussion board and I did, and people have replied that the site was reliable and very interesting, and deserved to be in the list. If you had removed all the other 'fan' sites from the list I would have understood, but you haven't. Thanks for your help :)--Lkermel 05:21, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, my bad, the URL I added was wrong and pointed to a dead link, indeed. The correct URL is www.vgden.com ... --Lkermel 06:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks a lot for fixing the link and adding it back to the page :) I initially said 'pirates' because I have several pc engine bootlegs reviewed on my site (http://www.vgden.com/vgden_pi.htm) and I thought it was ok to mention it to illustrate the article (One section actually talk about unofficial variations). Maybe I shouldn't have used 'pirates' but 'bootlegs' or 'unofficial' instead. Either way, thanks for fixing it, you rule :).--Lkermel 17:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
an:wiki
Hi, your bot has been approved in an:wikipedia. Now you must request for the bot flag in meta. Regards --Willtron (?) 
19:10, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
dumps on tet:
Hello,
is tet:User:ReyBrujo a bot / the RBSpamAnalyzerBot? I think so because ReyBrujo (and not RBSpamAnalyzerBot) edited the tet:User:ReyBrujo/Dumps. If so, your bot doesn't meet our rules for bots; the 2nd and 3rd. Best regards, tet:User:MF-Warburg 17:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Image question
I don't know if you will know the answer, but you might. I was wondering, if images are in the Commons area, it is ok to put them in image categories here, correct? Example Image:Ogle County Burlington Chicago and Quincy depot Oregon Il.jpg is in the Commons, but I have tagged it to a category here on the Wikipedia. I see other projects have done that, so I was doing it with them all that I found on Illinois. Just want to make sure that I am doing it right. Also put a project tag on the talk page.--Kranar drogin 00:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
WEDI (Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange
Hello ReyBrujo: i tried to edit the revised page with the incorrect title and the system would not let me change the title. so i created a new title (which is the correct title). i now plan to delete the page with the incorrect title so that we have one page. gratias. joebrophyjoe 03:49, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Dear ReyBrujo
i read your policy statement. but the name of the organization is WEDI and has used that name exclusively since 1991. Yes, it stands for workgroup for electronic data interchange but that itsname is WEDI. joebrophyjoe 03:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
WEDI
ReyBrujo; please go to http://wedi.org and view the website, and its advertising and its publications. Its name is Wedi. joe 04:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC) joebrophy
Fellowship of Friends March 31 page
Hola ReyBrujo, please don't delete User:Mario_Fantoni/FoF_March_31 (see the Talk page to see why it's needed). Also, you are welcome to help with the page - it is quite messy at the moment. Thanks! Mario Fantoni 04:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [7] -- ReyBrujo 04:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- I got it - thanks for the explanation. Mario Fantoni 05:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Warrior Angel
Is there any reason it is not in the list of Margaret Weis' books? I asked on the discussion page but no one replies> Jamhaw 20:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)jamhaw
Third opinion needed
ReyBrujo, I hope this is okay to do, but we need as third opinion in the Mr.Children discography talk [9] page. One of the editors refuses to, I guess, bend the rules and allow tables and such to be use to list the artists discography and the method used to source sales data. You can see the revision I had made in the discography history for reference. A third opinion would be greatly appreciated. --24.233.167.16 10:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Merging
I found this article Prairie du Rocher, Illinois that needs another article merged into it when you have a chance. It has been posted up for awhile. Thanks!--Kranar drogin 03:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I tagged this with a clean up Fred Hampton, but it seems that it was removed. Do you feel this article is biased, or was it just from my view of it?--Kranar drogin 10:39, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
I worked on cleaning up the Category:People from Illinois, and am about to work on Category:People from Chicago. I was wondering, the sub categories under Chicago, is there a way I can changed the names of a few of them so instead of one being "Chicago writers", it will instead be "Writers from Chicago"? Same with the others: Chicago baseball players - Basball players from Chicago Chicago golfers - Golfers from Chicago Chicago musicians - Musicians from Chicago Chicago politicians - Politicians from Chicago Chicago writers - Writers from Chicago I wanted to know now, before I start going through all these names and organizing them a bit better than having a huge among of people in a category. Do I just get ahold of you about changing them?--Kranar drogin 03:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Request your comments
I created a proposal. Please comment here.
Note: Please analyze each proposal on their own validity - do not reject a proposal just because you rejected a different one. - A Link to the Past (talk) 19:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [14] -- ReyBrujo 22:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- You know, I was just having a crazy and probably impossible idea - is there any way that you know where one could set an article's title up to change depending on the viewer's region? - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Requesting a review
Sorry to bother you again about an Editor Review, but I really think that this may be my last one. Can you spare a few moments to write a review at my latest ER? Thanks x 187437892594375. --tennisman 04:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. --ST47Talk 14:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:GC ViewtifulJoe RedHotRumble.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:GC ViewtifulJoe RedHotRumble.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:DAT promo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DAT promo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:08, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Hey Rey, couple of your admin buds have totally messed up Moccasin, Illinois. There are suppose to be two different pages, one for Moccasin, Illinois, and another for Moccasin Township, Effingham County, Illinois. I think they merged them, and redirected. They are two different bodies of government. One is a village overseen by a Village President, and the other is a township overseen by a Township Supervisor. Is there any way you could unmerged these please? If you have questions, let me know.--Kranar drogin 16:34, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- Canel the request.--Kranar drogin 16:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
RE: Protection requests for Italian Army Ranks and Ranks and Insignia of NATO Armies/OF/Italy
Problem user seems to fit the description on WP:LTA/Roitr. – Steel 00:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Reference? These are the ranks in use as the Italian Army presents them on its homepage:
- Generals
- higher officers
- officers
- NCO's
- soldiers and the rank "Maresciallo d'Italia" doesn't show up anywhere! Furthermore I was a member of the Italian Army for 4 years (2000-2004) and I can tell you for sure that a) the rank "Maresciallo d'Italia" was abolished on June 2nd, 1946 (it was a rank used by the fascists in WW2 and bringing it back would be like Germany introducing SS-ranks and insignia today) and b) the insignia user:Horemsa created (Image:210px-IT-Army-OF10.png) is ludicrous as it combines a 4- star generals rank with the golden wall symbol of the colonel rank, something that is and has never been in use or even contemplated by the Italian Army! So what is there to discuss??? user:Horemsa is trying to include false information into the article, he has been told so three times on talkpages and only as it became clear that he does ignore talkpages has he been told about his error in edit summaries! Still he continues to ignore the facts and reinserts his images in articles and gives as reason: "I have all right for it." or "I have put it here only for acquaintance. What it is difficult for you to understand? It not officially, but for the general knowledge" or "It is simple for the general knowledge and all. We have claim that is only Conjectural Design and it is not official". Conjectural Design???? And on top of that user:Horemsa is one of the 13 (!) socketpups of User:Roitr. Therefore I will not waste my time and discuss with one of the worst vandals on wikipedia, but rather continue to work on my projects: create all Coat of Arms of the Italian Army, create structural graphics of all active Armies and create articles about all 88 Alpini battalions. Anyway- thanks for protecting the articles. --noclador 00:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Reference? These are the ranks in use as the Italian Army presents them on its homepage:
- Ok- I thought you know and still asked me to be reasonable! Anyway- he uploaded the images and vandalized as User:Horemsa and also as: User:Yomar, User:Iormar and User:Yormar. I think it would be wise to make a checkuser test on the later three. --noclador 00:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Book
Hi Rey, yesterday I created a new page, Murder By Tejuana & Treachery By Bush And The Supreme Court. You sent me a message yesterday regarding this page. I have since cleaned up a bit. I have added a reference. I have rewritten a great deal more objectively. I have rearranged the structure of the page to fit the guidelines of Wikipedia. I trust that these changes will suffice for now. I do plan to fix up the page a great deal more in the near future. Please contact me with your thoughts. Also could you catagorize the page? Thanks. Smith lucas 20:34, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi Reybrujo, thanks for your advise and your editing skill. Smith lucas 23:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Deleting free images because of personality rights?
A user at the Korean Wikipedia deleted free images of Ayumi Hamasaki and Namie Amuro citing personality rights as a reason. I never heard of such a thing. Is this a valid reason? mirageinred 17:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks a lot. Unfortunately the user that removed the images only seem to speak a little Korean and my Korean language skills have deteriorated a bit also. But I will be sure to discuss that with the user. Thank you. mirageinred 03:59, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:Momusu live2007.jpg
I moved the aforementioned image (which we were extremely lucky to get, given the tight-ass restrictions at Morning Musume concerts) to the Commons. If there's anything else to do, I'll leave it in your hands. Thanks. -- Cjmarsicano 04:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
This image has not been deleted as there is discussion on the talk page regarding whether it is replaceable or not. GDonato (talk) 14:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
My RfB
 |
Thank you, ReyBrujo, for participating in my RfB, which ended unsuccessfully with a final tally of (80/22/3). |
Estilo Musical de Nightwish
Hola como estas? Espero que bien. Yo próximamente, empezare a traducir el articulo de Nightwish al español, aunque tengo que buscar a alguien que me ayude porque no entiendo mucho el ingles, pero mi pregunta para ti es, ¿por que decidieron que Nightwish pertenece al genero Power Metal Sinfónico? lo que pasa es que en la Wikipedia en español no hay un acuerdo, porque se la pasan cambiando su genero, agregando y quitando géneros, y aunque yo también creo que pertenece a Power Metal Sinfonico, no sabría como debatirlo en la pagina de discusión porque no se "demasiado" sobre esos temas. Te pediria que ayudaras de alguna forma si puedes, nos vemos.
--AS990 19:47, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:VanTomiko.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:VanTomiko.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Bureaucrat
Thanks for your comments. I am Wikipedia's newest bureaucrat. I will do my best to keep your concerns in mind as I perform my duties. Andre (talk) 07:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:DAI_ShinjitsuNoUta.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DAI_ShinjitsuNoUta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Image:DAI_8_Heart.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DAI_8_Heart.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 17:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Richard Purdie
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Richard Purdie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 16:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Dear Witch King! :)
_-_A_Little_Coaxing_(1890).jpg) |
Smile a little, smile a little, all along the road; Smile upon the troubled pilgrims whom you pass and meet; Smile upon your undone labour; not for one who grieves
Phaedriel |
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship. Unfortunately the nomination did not succeed, but please rest assured that I am still in full support of the Wikipedia project, and I'll try again in a few months! If you ever have any questions or suggestions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best wishes, --Elonka 03:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:GBA DragonBallZ BuusFury.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:GBA DragonBallZ BuusFury.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jay32183 04:39, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Another question as always
Hi, ReyBrujo. I finally found free pictures of Korean artists at Flickr. Can I upload any images I find there? I know I have to use some sort of a bot but other than that, can I or do I have to ask the user's permission? mirageinred 04:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Digg - Technology.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Digg - Technology.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Thank you very much for your support and your lovely comments at my RfA. Regards, Jogers (talk) 09:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Re: en:Image:DSC04491.jpg
Hi! I already uploaded the photo to wikimedia commons: commons:Image:Kwonboa.jpg. I didn't know the e-mail needs to be forwarded to ORTS. What is the e-mail adress i should forward it to? Thanks! --Schwans 00:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately
Too bad you can't hear me applauding this, because I am. Brilliantly said, really. -- But|seriously|folks 06:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Monica
I have explained here why I conisder fair use is appropriate.
--Barateiro 21:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- I do not agree with that rule.--Barateiro 21:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [26] -- ReyBrujo 21:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- When rules are absurd, one does not discuss them; one fight them either through revolution, riot or civil disobedience. And STOP changing the messages I send you. One does not change others' correspondence. It is just a matter of politeness.--Barateiro 21:25, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [26] -- ReyBrujo 21:21, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- I do not agree with that rule.--Barateiro 21:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Your diplomatic and polite approach to this user's conduct is admirable, but I'm afraid there was good cause to step in and bite. I hope that you don't mind my rebuffing of this user, I think that it is better to flatly discourage stupid behavior and if he followed your suggestion to discuss things at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content, it would only waste time for others and encourage more negative feedback. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 21:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Unprotecting List of best-selling video games
Hey ReyBrujo. Now that we have a formal discussion for whether the list should be split up, can we go back to semi-protection status so that it may be regularly edited again? Thanks. -Zomic13 20:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Message
thank you for ur kind message.i don't sign on here very much,but i sign on my youtube page alot i am tryin to get views,and i always love to meet new people.i also like to make everyone laugh,so stop on by. oh,and the reason why i was "editing"those peeps messages is cuz i'm tryin to get noticed,btw12scolsrud 01:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [29] -- ReyBrujo 01:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- man,your just a do gooder,aren't u?i bet inside ur steaming at the moment,but u gots to be nice cuz if not u'll get in trouble.well,agree to see my youtube page,and i'll stop advertising12scolsrud 01:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [30] -- ReyBrujo 01:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- u need to lighten up,i'm just having fun,so SMILE!12scolsrud 01:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- ooookkkk,i'll be good,i promise12scolsrud 01:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [30] -- ReyBrujo 01:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- man,your just a do gooder,aren't u?i bet inside ur steaming at the moment,but u gots to be nice cuz if not u'll get in trouble.well,agree to see my youtube page,and i'll stop advertising12scolsrud 01:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
sandbox = porn hell
There is too much porn there!
and we cant do anything about it —Preceding unsigned comment added by The7ruth (talk • contribs) 00:11, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Zune
Changing the image to that of the older model Zune reduces the quality of the article in that it doesn't display the entire Zune line, which is what the article is about. Please stop changing it. Charles 03:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [31] -- ReyBrujo 03:55, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
- The POV you are taking is that there is no difference between two different models of a product (i.e. there are 4, 8, 30, and 80 GB models, and your image only shows the 30GB). This very obviously detracts from the article. Also, NPOV dictates that your opinion on a product (which appears to be a factor here, in that for some reason you see no difference between the new and old models) stays out of the matter. Charles 03:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Please add this to list of wii games
Theres a game called Sadness for the wii i dont know how to add it but i have all the links that prove its a real game. heres the link http://www.gamestop.com/product.asp?product%5Fid=t000382 --FrosticeBlade 22:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
i'm sorry if i have to bug you do to it if you don't want to do it you dont have to.--FrosticeBlade 14:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Morning Musume image
I tried to e-mail him on something else unrelated a week ago and got a similar error. Wish I knew what to tell you. CJ Marsicano 19:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
The only time I've ever seen the featured get a protect is when it's taking an absolutely massive pounding
And by that I mean literally moment by moment vandalism. But there are just as many people watching the featured article as there are editing it. I used to think the featured should be protected, too, but anything that happens won't last seconds on a good day. HalfShadow 04:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
DP
Can you take over reverting for me, then? Seriously, that kid needs to be blocked. All he's done his entire career is engage in disputes over what genre a video game is. That, or some other tiny thing he needs to throw a tantrum about.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 04:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Stephen A. Douglas
Just to let you know, I am unwatching the Stephen A. Douglas page. It took me 15 minutes to detect and fix all of the vandalism on that page. Since you don't think that the page warrants semi-protection, you can spend the time fixing the vandalism that isn't noticed for days. I don't have time for this crap. I am pretty sick of Wikipedia catering to vandals and children. IvoShandor 13:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- As a note, I have no idea how long the vandalism I fixed remained but it was several days. I am not even sure who added it, it was not a simple matter of a revert though. Have fun with that. IvoShandor 13:55, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry if my comments are taken as harsh, personal or mean. They aren't meant to be, just to show my genuine frustration with the party of processes that don't work on Wikipedia. This place is a bureaucratic hell hole sometimes. IvoShandor 14:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [37] -- ReyBrujo 01:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I am not worried about it enough to request a second opinion. You probably know what you are doing. I was obviously a bit annoyed this morning, my apologies. IvoShandor 01:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [37] -- ReyBrujo 01:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I am sorry if my comments are taken as harsh, personal or mean. They aren't meant to be, just to show my genuine frustration with the party of processes that don't work on Wikipedia. This place is a bureaucratic hell hole sometimes. IvoShandor 14:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Link
hi! sorry, i was not trying to promote my link when I a link to digpicz.com page. digg users have been wanting picture section real long and i made it for them! can i add it back, please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.198.226.118 (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, but Wikipedia guidelines about external links state that, if your site is noteworthy, it will be added by someone else, not the owner. Also, the site is rather new and is still not that important. Maybe in a couple of years. -- ReyBrujo 19:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [38] -- ReyBrujo 19:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Hi! You told me that digpicz page, I was adding to digg's wikipedia page was not noteworthy. I would like to tell you that Digg's community has been begging for picture section for months. (just like video page has small items, they wanted [pics] have a section was well, with thumbnails). So I helped them out with digpicz.com.
I can have any Digg power user add the link to Digg. I think Digg power users (tamar, msaleem, suxmonkey or ilker, or mrbabyman) can assure you that is a great site to have added to wikipedia. Should I ask them to add it? They'll be more than happy to help me. And they have all the rights to do it, because they are power users. Then at least you won't be able to tell me that I am promoting my site. Because there is nothing to promote, it's a picture site for entertainment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.198.226.118 (talk) 21:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- That is not enough for Wikipedia. What I can offer you is to post a note at the Digg talk page to ask whether the external link is suitable. Personally, that Digg has an article does not mean a site trying to "fill a void" in the article subject is notable enough, but maybe they will agree with you. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
DS Homebrew Planet Dev-Scene
Sorry, but you removed a site (http://planet.dev-scene.com/) from the external links page on November 13th due to your deeming it a link added mostly to "promote a site". I do not think this was needed, and am adding it again. I have no affiliation with this site, but think it is a useful site, containing no adverts or malware, people deserve to know about. Please be more careful with your future reversions or the page may be locked by an administrator again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monsterfrog (talk • contribs)
Anette Olzon
I just realized when i uploaded what a bad name it was :O. I have uploaded the bigger resolution pic under a different name, could you delete or request to get the smaller version deleted? thanks. M3tal H3ad 03:45, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Thx spam
 
|
DragonBall
I noticed that you were the person who categorized Dragonball. Should the same be done for DragonBall? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 07:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: User talk:ReyBrujo
are you ALWAYS on,or is that an automated response to anything i do? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12scolsrud (talk • contribs)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [41] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- so did u ever visit my youtube? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12scolsrud (talk • contribs)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [42] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- well,in the time it takes u to track down all the crap i put on here,u couldve been there,done that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12scolsrud (talk • contribs)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [43] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- well,then i could make like a million wiki page thingys and post messages all over the place-it would be like a treasure hunt!!!!!(ive been told im difficult,but i don't believe it);) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12scolsrud (talk • contribs) 01:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [44] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- fine.believe it or not,im smart,too.im in T.A.G. (Talented And Gifted)and i test out at a college level(Im only 13)i just don't like to talk like a robot;i like to let loose and have fun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12scolsrud (talk • contribs) 01:44, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [44] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- well,then i could make like a million wiki page thingys and post messages all over the place-it would be like a treasure hunt!!!!!(ive been told im difficult,but i don't believe it);) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12scolsrud (talk • contribs) 01:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [43] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- well,in the time it takes u to track down all the crap i put on here,u couldve been there,done that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12scolsrud (talk • contribs)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [42] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- so did u ever visit my youtube? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12scolsrud (talk • contribs)
Re: WP:PTX
I've replied on the talk page. Cheers! east.718 at 02:32, December 17, 2007
Nightwish
Nightwish has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Thank you,
Burningclean [Speak the truth!] 04:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
article of games with over 1 million sold
Hey ReyBrujo, I just wanted to give you a heads up that a lot of Sony fanboys from GameTrailers are coming over and editing the Playstation 3 section and then citing VGChartz. So far they have added Assassin's Creed, Call of Duty 4, and changed the Resistance numbers all with a citation to VGChartz. I know referencing to VGChartz is not allowed and seen as an unreliable source so I just wanted to let you know that you might have to police that article. I've informed an Admin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.22.89 (talk) 21:05, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
So what do those pages say? E_dog95' Hi ' 00:27, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on the user's talk page. [45] -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
- OK - sounds fine. I understand about having links no matter what the language now. Thanks. I didn't consider these two links were that valuable because they (at the very least) weren't set up as references; just (external) links to outside pages. Having said that, I can appreciate your fix. Thanks again. :D E_dog95' Hi ' 03:59, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Uhm...
Why the hell am I being warned? I was reverting not for the edit war but because of percieved wikistalking; I'm completely neutral in the matter. Will (talk) 02:50, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
SqueakBox reverted your warning
Are we finally clear on who the real problem editor in the whole "co-" issue is? SB has a distinct POV that he's trying to enforce, and he doesn't care to be warned against reinserting it. Mr Which??? 05:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Its considered bad form to send template warnings to experienced users, please do not add templates to my user page again, ReyBrujo. Who exactly are you implying is a problem, Mr Which. Somebody has being adding this dispute as a ref and the co- as fact to almost any article that Wales is mentioned in, which is clearly an NPOV violation, Slashdot being a good example and one has to wonder why certain editors want to engage in defending this kind of off topic POV insertions. Its one think to add this material to wikipedia or the Walkes and Sanger articles but to add it to any article merely because Wales is mentioned is not okay, we have NPOV and BLP policies to cover this kind of stuff. In my opinion Jimbo got it right here. Thanks for your attention. Thanks, SqueakBox 05:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)