User talk:Riley Cohen

Riley Cohen, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Riley Cohen! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

February 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. An edit you recently made to Neil Gorsuch seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:52, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Your browser/editor

Appears to have replaced all incidents of "/" with "%2F". i.e. <ref name=nlj/> became <ref name=nlj%2F> Please use wp:preview to verify your changes. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:55, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk: Richard B. Spencer for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Memetic Engineering Page

Please stop adding unsourced claims. The source is NOT in the body. As well Leveious Rolando and John Sokol has stated that he did not work with Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff. You added this info without proof. Leveious, John Sokol and Gibron never worked with them. I question your motive behind this edit. Please stop adding unsourced claims or I will file a complaint with the Wiki admin.

Murder of Seth Rich

Please don't try closing controversial move requests. Thanks.Volunteer Marek (talk) 22:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

William LeGate

You have already been reverted once before by an editor claiming the material you added was undue, and sourced to a non-RS source, so per WP:BRD discuss it on the talk page of the article, and get support from other editors for it, before adding it again! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 19:12, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Thomas.W It was a different source when you reverted. Riley Cohen (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

The new source isn't any better than the previous one, it's also undue on a WP:BLP since it's only intended to humiliate the subject of the article. Don't forget that this is an encyclopaedia, not a blog or a forum... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 19:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

ANI-notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

• Did you honestly think noone would notice? - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:01, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

I've done it before ;) Will go a bit slower next time. Riley Cohen (talk) 23:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

So this isn't your first account? Would you care to elaborate? - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Extended confirmed status revoked

And, also, you've ensured that there are many eyes on your editing as well. Here's a suggestion; stay well away from any BLP articles in the future. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 23:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

No thank you. Riley Cohen (talk) 23:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

It wasn't a suggestion, it was a "suggestion". BLP-violators usually have a very short career here... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 23:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Carole Delga

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Carole Delga, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:14, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hermann Schützenhöfer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Hermann Schützenhöfer, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Mlpearc (open channel) 23:15, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Indef blocked

As you've made it clear you have gamed the system before to get past extended protection, I'm blocking you for both disruptive editing and behavior, and the high likelihood of being a sock of someone. Feel free to read WP:GAB. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 23:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Dennis Brown User:Ks0stm Lessen the block please. How about one week? Riley Cohen (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

NippLeGate listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NippLeGate. Since you had some involvement with the NippLeGate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Move review for Damn (Kendrick Lamar album)

An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 12:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)