User talk:Rishikaditi

February 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Template:Alchon Huns—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at History of Asmara, you may be blocked from editing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ramagupta. GA-RT-22 (talk) 22:46, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Co existence

why it is utmost importance to follow the notion of co-existence? With plants and animals along with rest of us Rishikaditi (talk) 19:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ramagupta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ramagupta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability and reliable sources

Please see WP:V and WP:RS, and go through Help:Introduction if you haven't already. When you add content to Wikipedia, you must cite reliable sources. utcursch | talk 21:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]