User talk:Ritukaapur

AfD[edit]

Only Administrators are empowered to close an active Article for Deletion. Removing an AfD tag from an article is considered vandalism. David notMD (talk) 11:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arunpawargere, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

casualdejekyll 14:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Arunpawargere per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arunpawargere. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ritukaapur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been a new user, and this page appeared, so i checked why it is up for deletiton. Then i started reading Afd and when i opened the references they were actually right and were correct. So then i studied how to remove page from deletiton, and then i did the same. If i have done wrong then let me know. I have seen all of the users have nominated page for deletiton but only the user who has created page jas opposed. So i studied and supported by checking the page only. If any user has doubt can go to the wikipedia pages and check their references and content. Youthistaan, People News Chronicle Ritukaapur (talk)

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've fixed the unblock request template for you, but I should advise you that I made the connection between your accounts using technical logs that store information about your device when you edit any page; it was not based on your shared interest in those articles. I am confident that another checkuser will be able to confirm my findings. Girth Summit _(blether) 17:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]