User talk:Roberthutch

Roberthutch, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Roberthutch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vesco[edit]

Hello Roberthutch,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vesco for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 13:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Roberthutch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Vesco, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:59, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article notability for Draft:Vesco – The story of the biggest securities fraud of modern times - the looting of IOS[edit]

Hey there,

I was perusing the submissions at WP:AFC today and came across the draft you submitted for the book Draft:Vesco – The story of the biggest securities fraud of modern times - the looting of IOS. As part of finding out whether the topic is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia, we must evaluate how significant the coverage is in references. The book needs to have been discussed by at least two independent sources whose coverage of the book (and not of the Vesco fraud itself) is non-trivial. While the second reference includes substantial coverage of the book, the third reference only mentions the book trivially (it's a single sentence that, although praises the book, does not cover it substantially. It is probably using the book as reference material for the article, but that's more coverage of Robert Vesco than of the book per se) I have also been unable to locate the first source.

As reviewers for Articles for Creation, our goal is to make sure that potential concerns are addressed in these articles so that they don't get deleted when published. As such, I was wondering if you perhaps had other sources that cover the book, as well as more information on the book itself.

If you do find some, you can add them to the references in the draft, contact me at my talk page, or ask for help in the live help channel.

Best, Acebulf (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vesco – The story of the biggest securities fraud of modern times - the looting of IOS (April 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Robert Vesco. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The book isn't notable in its own right. There could be a new section about the book in the Robert Vesco article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vesco – The story of the biggest securities fraud of modern times - the looting of IOS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vesco – The story of the biggest securities fraud of modern times - the looting of IOS, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at User:Roberthutch/sandbox. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:35, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:Roberthutch/sandbox has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Roberthutch/sandbox. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]