User talk:Royankitkumar

Welcome!

Hello, Royankitkumar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 22:21, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Larry Hockett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Larry Hockett (Talk) 07:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shamsheer Vayalil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shamsheer Vayalil, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shamsheer Vayalil. Serols (talk) 16:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:47, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't really tell if this is malice or incompetence. Should you return in 31 hours with the same kind of disruptive edits, we're probably going to decide it was malice, since you now have an opportunity to read over your edits and the responses they garnered. Drmies (talk) 16:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 15:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Royankitkumar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Few months earlier I was new to wikipedia I didn't know that how it works,in that duration of time I made various mistakes which lead to vandalism but my intention was not to vandalise wikipedia.When I was blocked during that duration of time(approx a year) I analysed work of different wikipedia editors and I found the correct way of editing wikipedia.So,I request all administrators to give me a last chance to prove myself trustworthy.

Decline reason:

These weren't mistakes. you didn't need to analyse the work of others to determine what you were doing was wrong. You were clearly deliberately setting out to harm Wikipedia. Over and over again. Despite multiple warnings. Despite multiple blocks. Yamla (talk) 00:01, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Appeal extracted by Hoary (talk) from botched attempt immediately above, 23:54, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]