User talk:Royroydeb/Archive 14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your GA nomination of Nawa-I-Barakzayi District

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nawa-I-Barakzayi District you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:00, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Michel/Ñíguez

Vasco already took care of it. Cheers, MYS77 15:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hindal Mirza

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hindal Mirza you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johanna -- Johanna (talk) 04:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review of Shisha Gumbad

Hello Royroydeb, you recently reviewed GA nomination of Shisha Gumbad here. Thanks for your time but it would be helpful if you can explain the reason behind the decline (as none was provided in article talkpage). Cheers, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Hello Royroydeb, Since you have not yet replied, I am still wondering as to what is the problem with the GA nomination of Shisha Gumbad article that you failed. Neither have I seen any feedback from you (anywhere) nor any intimation to myself that you started the review and / or the reason behind the decline. What steps did you take for the GA review? If you think you made a mistake in reviewing, kindly revert the change and let someone else review the page. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:16, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ranjitsinhji

The article Ranjitsinhji you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ranjitsinhji for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Relentlessly -- Relentlessly (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Serdar Tasci

The article Serdar Tasci you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Serdar Tasci for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 00:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bahadur Shah I

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bahadur Shah I you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Royroydeb. You have new messages at AKS.9955's talk page.
Message added 10:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 10:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bahadur Shah I

The article Bahadur Shah I you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bahadur Shah I for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Zwerg Nase -- Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month is COMING!

Hi Royroydeb ,

The Wikipedia Asian Month will begin in less than an hours, and once again, thank you for signing up! Let's help the world know more about Asia! Below are a few reminders for you:

  1. Please check out the rules here. Some rules have been adjusted—the most important being that on the English Wikipedia, stubs may be expanded with some limitations.
  2. Do take the time to read the Q&A if you have any questions, or ask on the talk page.
  3. The list of participants has been alphabetized so you can more easily find your name and report your contributions.
  4. There is a template that you can use on your user page. {{Template:User Asian Month‎}}

Enjoy the Wikipedia Asian Month :) --AddisWang (talk)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

2015 GA Cup Wrap-Up

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Finals/Wrap-Up



The second-ever GA Cup is now over! The competition officially ended Thursday. Congrats to everyone who participated, and especially to our finalists.

The winner of the 2nd GA Cup is Zwerg Nase! He earned 408 points, over 100 points more than he earned in all previous rounds. He tied with our second-place winner, Sturmvogel 66 with 367 points, in number of articles reviewed (24), and they earned almost the same points for reviewing articles that were in the queue the longest (Zwerg with 322, Sturmvogel with 326). Basically, they tied in points, but what made the different for Zwerg was the advantage he had in reviewing longer articles. It seems that the rule change of earning more realistic points for longer articles made a difference. All of our contestants should be proud of the work they were able to accomplish through the GA Cup. Congrats to these worthy opponents!

Our third and fourth place winners, Johanna and Tomandjerry211, also ran a close race, with 167 points and 147 points respectfully. We had one withdrawal; we found it interesting that competitors dropped out in Round 2 and 3 as well. One of the original judges and co-creator of this competition, User:Dom497 stepped down as judge during Round 3; as stated previously, we will miss his input and wish him the best.

The judges were pleased with our results, even though fewer users competed this time compared to our inaugural competition. We recognize that this might be due to holding the competition during the summer months. We intend on looking more closely when we should conduct this contest, as well as other aspects of the GA Cup. We've set up a feedback page for everyone's input about how we should conduct the contest and what rule changes should be made. If you have any ideas about how we can improve things, please visit it and give us your input.

Again, thanks to all and congratulations to our winners! Please stay tuned for the start of GA Cup #3.

Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar and MrWooHoo.

A barnstar for you!

The Invisible Barnstar
The judges would like to congratulate you for making the 2nd round being in the top 16! Although you didn't make the top 9 of Round 2, we appreciate that you participated in the 2nd Annual GA Cup. We hope to see you next year! MrWooHoo (talk) 23:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nawa-I-Barakzayi District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shamalan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Hi ! I want to be your friend. Ciphers00 (talk) 14:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015: The results

WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.

This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. Belarus Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.

Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to United States Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.

A full list of our award winners are:

We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.

Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup Award

Awarded for participating in the 2015 WikiCup. Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 19:34, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Jajau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wazir. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Bahadur Shah I

Hello! Your submission of Bahadur Shah I at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Lahore (1752), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wazir. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Understanding the sources

Hello there, from Portugal,

Jorge Alonso: 1 - he did not score three goals in 36 games in his first season with UD Salamanca, he scored ZERO in ONE game; 2 - CD Leganés is in Segunda División now, yes sir, but when he signed they competed in Segunda División B. Don't worry, I have already duly cleaned up article.

Attentively --84.90.219.128 (talk) 20:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes, I understand the franchise bit, but to keep everything coherent I choose this approach (FC Goa plays the same sport as, let's say, Arsenal, do they not? Hence, "club" is universal, and Atlético K (or FC Goa, etc) is from India so "Indian club" is 100% correct). The leagues (in this case the ISL or the I-L) should be dealt with in the proper storyline.

Cheers --84.90.219.128 (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

  • I'll take care of that storyline, later today. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 16:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Done, you can add the chart now if you want, it will have been a good teamwork. Thanks. --84.90.219.128 (talk) 23:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Bahadur Shah I

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Jorge Alonso

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Lahore (1752)

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Masjid an-Nabawi

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Al-Masjid an-Nabawi you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of D'SuperHero -- D'SuperHero (talk) 13:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

GA Notice

GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Al-Masjid an-Nabawi in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

D'SuperHero (talk) 13:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
· · ·

Please consider this your requested ping to return to your review here. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Royroydeb, you opened this review page on November 16, but you haven't yet begun the actual review. Please give this your attention as soon as possible. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Please note that I plan to close this review at the end of December 24 UTC if you have not posted the start of it by then. You've already had a month and a week to start it, and I'm allowing you two weeks from the above review. It really isn't far to the nominator to claim a review but not do it. I hope to see your post there in the next 32 hours. Many thanks for your attention to this matter. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Do address about the issues on the article and update yourself regarding it. Denial in addressing issues may lead to the quick-fail of the article nomination. Thank you. D'SuperHero (talk) 07:10, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Masjid an-Nabawi

The article Al-Masjid an-Nabawi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Al-Masjid an-Nabawi for things which need to be addressed. D'SuperHero (talk) 08:40, 17 December 2015 (UTC)