User talk:Rsrikanth05/Archive September 2015

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Rsrikanth05. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Please comment on Talk:Anglo-Saxons

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Anglo-Saxons. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

West Mesa murder

Hello Rsrikanth05!

I corrected dates on the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Mesa_murders , while the article had wrong years mentioned, according to the information police have given for public about the murder case. Soon after I had made the corrections, you edited my corrections and returned the wrong dates. Any reason for this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JSaviola (talk • contribs) 17:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

I undid your edit because the lead sentence said 2009 and not 2005. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Out of copyright in 2013

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Out of copyright in 2013. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Huh? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Wildside (Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch song)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Wildside (Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch song). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia

News and notes: Flow placed on ice

Discussion report: WMF's sudden reversal on Wiki Loves Monuments

Featured content: Brawny

In the media: Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage

Traffic report: You didn't miss much

Technology report: Tech news in brief

Please comment on Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

I reward you this kitten for you, for being a great user!

- Minionlover2015 (talk) 16:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:03, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Obergefell v. Hodges

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Obergefell v. Hodges. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Al Hirt songs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Al Hirt songs. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Trojan tagline

You undid my change to the Trojan (brand) page. The tagline of Trojan brand condoms is real.good.sex. I am not vandalizing a page, I am correcting it.

See: http://www.trojancondoms.com/Resources/AboutUs.aspx

The "For her pleasure" refers to "for her pleasure" condoms which are a specific product line of Trojan.

See: http://www.trojancondoms.com/Product/her-pleasure-lubricated-condoms.aspx

I understand I am a novice at editing but I am just trying to make a legitimate correction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PewterPenguin (talk • contribs) 02:13, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@PewterPenguin: Nowhere on the page does it mention that it is the tagline. It is jut mentioned there. Unless explicitly mentioned, it can't be treated as a valid source. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@Rsrikanth05: there is a mention of the use of it as a tagline here:

http://www.adweek.com/adfreak/trojans-new-ads-are-subtle-playful-and-even-safe-kids-155251

(Last paragraph of the article)

Trojan themselves never explicitly claim a tagline, though they do use it in the maner a tagline by definition is used. The other 2 phrases they use as a tagline are "pleasure of protection" (all lowercase, as seen on most Trojan brand Twitter posts) and "Trojan. Pleasure you want. Protection you trust." Which seems to be the tagline from a previous advertising campaign around 2010.

So the modern tagline should either be "real.good.sex." or "pleasure of protection". The prior is still in use on the trojan website and the latter is constantly used by Trojan on their Twitter page.

While there is no first hand source of Trojan explicitly claiming their tagline, Trojan does use the two phrases above in the way a company would use a tagline. And while a man may not explicitly claim what is in his hand is a hammer, when he starts swinging it at nails, it is safe to assume that is what it is.

If the requirement is Trojan explicitly saying publicly "My tagline is..." for something to be a credible source then the tagline section on the Trojan brand page should be removed, along with the tagline on 95% of company Wikipedia pages, as the business/advertising term "tagline" really is only used internally. --PewterPenguin (talk)

If you had the adweek source, you should have inserted it in the first place. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:B'Day (Beyoncé album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:B'Day (Beyoncé album). Legobot (talk) 00:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2015)

Two high divers in mid-air

Hello, Rsrikanth05.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

High diving

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Plain dress • Historic house

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Regarding your vandalism claims. You seem to have not seen the reference which meets WP:RS guidelines. I am quoting her word and provided the place to forward to. It's a Dutch TV documentary in which she willingly gave an interview. She knew at the time of the interview that the documentary was on her. It's the original documentary and there is ton of references on WP using YT. Kindly explain the real reason or revert you undo because I am not doing anything without precedent. NiceAdam (talk) 23:09, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Please discuss on talk. I reverted because others also did the same. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3

WikiProject Good Articles's 2015 GA Cup - Round 3

Greetings, all! We hope that everyone had a nice summer.

Saturday saw the end of Round 2. Things went relatively smoothly this month. The top 2 from 4 pools, plus the top participant (the wildcard, or "9th place") of all remaining competitors, moved onto Round 3. We had one withdrawal early in Round 2, so he was replaced by the next-highest scorer from Round 1. Round 2's highest scorer was Pool D's Tomandjerry211, who earned an impressive 366 points; he also reviewed the most articles (19). Close behind was Zwerg Nase, also in Pool D, at 297 points and 16 articles. The wildcard slot went to Good888. Congrats to all!

Round 3 will have 9 competitors in 3 pools. The key to moving forward was reviewing articles with the longest nomination dates, as it has been in every round up to now. For example, 2 competitors only needed to review 2 articles each to win in their pools, and each article were either from the pink nomination box (20 points) or had languished in the queue for over 5 months (18 points). The GA Cup continues to be a success in many ways, even with fewer competitors this time. For some reason, the competitors in the 2015 GA Cup have reviewed fewer articles in Round 2, which has made the judges scratch their head in confusion. We've speculated many reasons for that: the summer months and vacations, our competitors are saving their strength for the final rounds, or they all live in the Pacific Northwest and the heavy wildfire smoke has affected their thinking. Whatever the reason, Round 2 competitors reviewed almost 100 articles, which is a significant impact in the task of reviewing articles for GA status. We've considered that the lower participation this competition is due to timing, so we intend to discuss the best time frame for future GA Cups.

For Round 3, participants have been placed randomly in 3 pools of 3 contestants each; the top editor in each pool will progress, as well as the top 2 of all remaining users. Round 3 will start on September 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on September 28 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here.

Good luck to the remaining contestants, and have fun!

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6 and Jaguar, and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Good articles by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Quds Day

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Quds Day. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
388	Vinayak Damodar Savarkar (talk)	Add sources
39	Frank Merrill (talk)	Add sources
1,401	Dead Sea (talk)	Add sources
527	Nashik (talk)	Add sources
32	Government College University (Lahore) (talk)	Add sources
74	Trunk (car) (talk)	Add sources
67	Rape in Pakistan (talk)	Cleanup
12	Tamil executives and businesspeople (talk)	Cleanup
5	Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights (talk)	Cleanup
5,775	Israel (talk)	Expand
596	Five Nights at Freddy's 2 (talk)	Expand
175	Puri (talk)	Expand
87	Central Railway zone (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
49	Gender segregation and Muslims (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
105	Rajneeshpuram (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
25	75th Infantry Regiment (Ranger) (talk)	Merge
77	Secretary (title) (talk)	Merge
5	Walnut Street Prison (talk)	Merge
17	Florimond Claude, Comte de Mercy-Argenteau (talk)	Wikify
35	Green Signal (talk)	Wikify
2	N. Selvaraj (talk)	Wikify
9	Fleet media (talk)	Orphan
1	Marisol Grondin (talk)	Orphan
6	Guangzhou Symphony Youth Orchestra (talk)	Orphan
800	Barbershop 3 (talk)	Stub
7	LaFlora, the Princess Academy (talk)	Stub
511	Nushrat Bharucha (talk)	Stub
1,741	Kis Kisko Pyaar Karu (talk)	Stub
9	George Chryssides (talk)	Stub
12	WAPDA Town (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:48, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: Today's dose of vandalism

I think it would better if you could grab the IPs, Red users who messed up Mindless Behavior and OMG (group) and block them. Would save a lot of us a whole bunch of hassle. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Re your message: Check my block log. I just haven't posted the notices yet. When I go on a blocking spree on an attack, I hand out all of the blocks first and then go back to issue the notices. Getting the blocks in is more important than notification. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Sounds Good enough. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 05:57, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

All done. 25 blocks handed out and two other targeted articles semi-protected. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:05, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Years Past Matter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Years Past Matter. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scanian dialect

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Scanian dialect. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Community portal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Community portal. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

Gallery: Being Welsh

Featured content: Killed by flying debris

Op-ed: DYK, or proudly displaying incorrect information on the Main Page with alarming regularity

News and notes: The Swedish Wikipedia's controversial two-millionth article

Traffic report: Mass media production traffic

Technology report: Tech news in brief

In the media: Calling all scientists!; More Wikipedia editors in the Netherlands than all of Africa combined

Please comment on Talk:List of best-selling girl groups

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of best-selling girl groups. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Monsanto legal cases. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians/Categorization

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musicians/Categorization. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2015)

Transection of a human head

Hello, Rsrikanth05.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Head

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: High diving • Plain dress

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:11, 14 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Some changes to article titles

Hi, I was wondering if you could help me. I was moving Eastern Arabic numerals to Arabic-Indic numerals as per WP:COMMONNAME but some seem to not have liked it for other reasons. Pretty sure Eastern Arabic numerals is a recently invented term. I did the move again but it may be undone soon.Filpro (talk) 00:53, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Not too sure if related but a decade ago Hindu Arabic numerals was moved to Arabic Numerals, so maybe you could have a look at the discussion. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jones & Jury (TV series)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jones & Jury (TV series). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Alban Gerhardt

Hi Rsrikanth05, I am trying to update the wikipedia entry for myself (Alban Gerhardt) and you are somehow switching it back to a slightly wrong and very incomplete version. I want it to read my newest biography, not some quotes from some newspaper article where the journalist misunderstood me. I have never "supported" the Green Party, have voted for them a couple of times, but not in recent years. Also I was not artist in residence in Oregon from 2002 until 2015 but from 2012-2015, and lots of things are missing. My first teacher was Marion Vetter, not Götz Teutsch, whom I am usually not mentioning because I don't feel that I have learnt much from him. I would be very grateful if you could stop reversing my changes! Thank you and best wishes, Alban Gerhart — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albancello (talk • contribs) 15:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@Albancello:. Hi, I undid your edits because they are unsourced. Please note that Wikipedia is not a platform for you to showcase yourself. Your edits show that you have a conflict of interest. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:36, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@Rsrikanth05:. Thank you, I understand, but at the same time I am the only one who knows what is true. To source some articles in a wrong way is not really helpful. I for example never said that my cello belonged to Mussolini - the person who sold it to me said it, but I have very strong doubts and absolutely no prove that it really belonged to Mussolini. Seeing it there on Wikipedia makes it almost a fact. What can I do about these things? I did mention that story in an article, but this is not a fact, it's nothing more than a rumor, and I did mention it like one. My biography is not really a showcase but just a selection of parts of my professional life. To mention my concert and a rather bad review from a mediocre journalist from 22 years ago is not really representative nor any "truth", just a personal opinion... Thanks for your help, best wishes --albancello

@Albancello: If you feel there are genuine issues with the article, please discus them on Talk:Alban Gerhardt. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement

Hello Rsrikanth05:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by User:Northamerica1000 using mass messaging

The Lloyd Pye article does not speak to the whole truth. There are many facts not mentioned. I can reference places if it will be left in the article when i do — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrandonAlan1117 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jesus

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jesus. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Mumbai etymology

My comment has been removed by you .. "Marathi the mother tongue of koli" .. Why is it so .. Could you explain , elaborate this to me ... I have given a perfect/authentic link to you http://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/nfile/1064

In this they have clearly mentioned language that koli speak..

Any way I am reverting your commit .. If any thing is wrong please elaborate it .. Prshntsathe (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Please word it properly. It sounds very tacky. -_Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:21, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Administrators

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Administrators. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Stop reverting my edits

Can you please read what I'm doing before reverting. It was discussed on Template talk:Singlechart, a new template has been made for the South Africa's chart for better access. All I'm doing is replacing the citations with the template! Why are you reverting this and how is this unconstructive!? 178.239.82.6 (talk) 06:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Please learn to be civil. Abusive edit summaries will get you nowhere and will just antagonise others. If you were polite, I wouldn't have reverted you. Also, please explain your edits in the edit summary rather than why the fuck are you reverting. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

It would help if you took the time to see what change was being made. Think before you revert. 178.239.82.6 (talk) 06:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

It would also help if you explained. For an uninvolved party like me, if a ref is being removed, the next step is to undo. -_Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

You are blind reverting and are in the wrong. You should apologize! I'm trying to help Wikipedia and then you go and blind revert my edits on Summer (Calvin Harris song), I Need Your Love (Calvin Harris song), Burn (Ellie Goulding song) which were constructive and then warn me for unconstructive editing even after I explained! The citation removed was replaced with a template which automatically generates the same citation! How hard is that for you to understand? I can't believe someone can be so blind and rude to someone actually making a positive contribution to this place... 178.239.82.157 (talk) 06:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm being rude? You're the one who used an abusive edit summary here. I'm being super polite here. But yeah, have it your way. I don't care. I'm not going bother editing articles on songs anymore. You don't need to respond to this. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ahmed Mohamed (student) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Mohamed (student) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Mohamed (student) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Action Hero Shoot! 10:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I expected this. I'm now waiting for the emails accusing me of being a muslim terrorist. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Paul Singer (businessman). Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Make article.

My link has its own wikipedia entry. It is obviously encyclopedia worthy. I referenced make in my college papers and is an authority on DYI projects which relate to the article.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Make_(magazine) --RaymondLull.

Nowheree on the article does it specify that the clock was purchased. Also, existence of an Wikipedia article doesn't mean it is worthy of use as a source. Please read WP:SYNTH. It seems like the only reason the link was added was to advertise for Make. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=makezine.com&title=Special%3ASearch&go=Go

Make has already been used as a source a multitude of times within wikipedia on popular topics such as Arduino, Super Nintendo, amongst others. It is a reliable news source as per definition of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources

The article does specify that the clock was purchased. "more so as simply the guts of a standard digital alarm clock" --RaymondLull

Just because it has been used as a source, doesn't mean it can be used over and over again. Right now, it is the only source that makes such a claim. Please discuss on the article talk page as it is a major controversial change. Gain consensus before adding it. Also, please sign your posts with ~~~~ --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

1. It gives credence to the fact that Makezine is a recognized reliable source within wikipedia. 2. I did not believe it was a controversial change nor do I believe I require multiple sources to make a claim for a reliable news source. Since your complaint was the nature of the citation. I changed it to a "better citation" tag and took the discussion to talk. RaymondLull (talk) 11:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

@RaymondLull: You should stop making up stuff (no pun intended). There are no sources that describe that the clock was purchased. Of course, parts were purchased, but that is not the point. Stop the nonsense, please. - Cwobeel (talk) 14:26, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Contributions to Adith Arun

Rsrikanth05 This is regarding the upload on article Adith Arun, as the picture represents the face of article. And as I am officially representing Adith Arun I request you to undo the changes. Itsmeesathya (talk) 12:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC), 12:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Please discuss this on the talk page first. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hi, thanks for creating article Petlawad explosion. It is also featured on "Main page" in "in the news" section. Really good work. I'm also feeling nice because I have some role in renaming the article. Thanks again.-- Human3015^TALK 13:20, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Heya @Human3015: Thank you very much. It means a lot to me. Also, thank you for pointing out my mistake about the naming. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

Editorial: No access is no answer to closed access

News and notes: Byrd and notifications leave, but page views stay; was a terror suspect editing Wikipedia?

In the media: Is there life on Mars?

Featured content: Why did the emu cross the road?

Traffic report: Another week

Technology report: Tech news in brief

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

AFD Stats

Where is this AFD Stats link you referred to?

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 23:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Cirt:, it's the AfD Vote Counter whose link is present on the very first line of the page, below the Not a Majority Vote box. Here is a link. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 23:58, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Ah okay thanks. FWIW, I've added a bit more to the article 2007 Boston Mooninite panic, I found some sources reflecting back on the incident in a historical context. It's most interesting to see what books and media sources say about the overreaction years later. — Cirt (talk) 23:59, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps someone should put up a note for future participants at the AfD. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 03:07, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

I would like to thanks for corrections you made and cleared my doubts actually I am new and thought title names in local languages can be added I didn't added them in official language but will stop doing that, replying late as I just saw your post, thanks once again Mukhaiyar (talk) 21:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:WGN-TV

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:WGN-TV. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2015)

"Boy on white horse" by Theodor Kittelsen

Hello, Rsrikanth05.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Scottish mythology

Please be bold and help to improve this article!

Previous selections: Head • High diving

Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: EuroCarGT (talk) 00:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Please comment on Talk:Waldorf education

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Waldorf education. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Rsrikanth05 reported by User:Winkelvi (Result: ). Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 20:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Exactly, what are you trying to prove here? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joke

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Joke. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Ahmed Mohammed

Noticed you rolled back my edit on Ahmed_Mohamed_(student) regarding the city of Irving of in which the article said: "Irving, Texas reportedly has had a long history of Islamophobia and racial profiling." That statement was linked to http://mic.com/articles/125404/texas-city-where-ahmed-mohamed-was-arrested-has-a-long-disturbing-history-of-islamophobia

Said article is full of conjecture and memes but offers no real substance to the issues of Irving, Texas. Not really factual and more of an opinion piece and POV biased. So why did you revert it?

Heyyouoverthere (talk) 21:55, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

If you read the statement which the source was backing up, it said reportedly. If you feel there are errors, please discuss. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The article itself offers no substance of Islamophobia and racial profiling. Based on what the author wrote, they compiled info in order to make the case and obvious they did not partake in Irving city council meetings at the time and more than likely does not live in Irving. And I take it you do not either. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 22:39, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Are you trying to imply that I'm not qualified to edit the article because I don't lie in Irving? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 22:40, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

A few questions:

Do you live in Irving?

Do you live in the DFW area?

Do you live in the United States?

Do you feel you are qualified to edit the article based on what is reported?

Do you feel you will be able to continue to edit the article 30 days-6 months from now when an update happens?

Will you be able to update the article when Channel 5 does the update during a live segment at the State Fair and the tie-in to the science fair exhibit when people display items similar to the clock? State Fair opens in about 5 days.

Will you be able to update the article when additional information comes out later on. Not necessarily reported on in international news but locally, such as in the local community paper.

Will you be able to pop out your front door, pick up said community paper that was tossed on your front lawn, read the new story and update the article?

                For the above questions a simple Yes or No is all that is required.

The reason that I ask is if an event, for example a massive explosion at a chemical plant, were to happen in India and made international news do you think someone outside of India is best to edit an article on it? Sure articles would be written and and headlines splashed across websites and someone could summarize the info but the actual content, the nitty gritty might be missed.

Would they be in the best position to update it later on? Such as 1-2 months later on that chemical plant has been rebuilt and the total number of killed and injured is finally tallied. Would that be reported in international news? Perhaps. Would it garner the same attention as when it first happened? Probably not. Would someone not from that area even hear about it? More than likely not.

Heyyouoverthere (talk) 17:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

I am NOT obliged to answer your nonsensical questions. Please learn to be civil. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

I am being civil. I did not cuss. I did not call you names. I asked simple, clear cut questions. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 21:45, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Whatever. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 04:54, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm Omnipresent. Better? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

No, you are not Omnipresent I am still asking that you answer the above questions. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 13:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

And I'm still telling you that I'm not going to bother. I am not obliged to answer your questions. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) If Rsrikanth05 is making a BLP claim of being Omnipresent, he is omnipresent. If you disagree, the onus is on you to bring in WP:RS that contract it. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Repeatedly pinging me on Talk:Ahmed Mohamed clock incident‎

Not sure if this would count as WP:CANVASSing, but it's kind of annoying. The article is on my watchlist, I'm giving it as much attention as I feel like giving it. If somebody makes an unreasonable edit and your talk comment about it gets no response after a while (either from the disagreeing editor, or a third party), go ahead and revert "per talk". --McGeddon (talk) 12:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi @McGeddon: I am extremely extremely sorry about that. I won't do it again. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 12:51, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. The main problem is that it can give the impression that there's a little tag-team WP:CABAL who'll back each other up to keep content they don't like out of a particular article, which doesn't look great from the outside. You should be able to rely on passing editors responding to questions or bad edits. --McGeddon (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)