User talk:Rudra Choudhary

March 2021

Hello, I'm Escape Orbit. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nithin Kamath have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 10:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Rajdeep Bijarniya. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Rajdeep Bijarniya, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:06, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Rajdeep Bijarniya. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at RajdeepBijarniya. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rudra Choudhary, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:21, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GirthSummit _(blether) 14:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

On review of your contributions to date, I have made this block indefinite. GirthSummit _(blether) 15:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Rajesh121skr per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajesh121skr. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:55, 2 March 2021 (UTC)