Jump to content

User talk:Rupnik17

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Rupnik17, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 15:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I need to delete a page I erroneously created while compiling the draft

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Philippe Bober.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Philippe Bober.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 15:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Philippe Bober.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Philippe Bober.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 16:46, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Philippe Bober.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Philippe Bober.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

[edit]

Please help me with...

The copyright of the picture Philippe_Bober.jpg that I uploaded yesterday. I do have the rights to make it circulate on Wikipedia but I can't seem to update its status with the

tag

Rupnik17 (talk) 08:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file has been listed for discussion because the same picture has already been published elsewhere, casting some doubt as to whether you are the copyright holder of the file, and thus authorized to release the image under a free license (or into the public domain). Note that even if the photographer (and/or subject) gave you permission to use the file on Wikipedia, this is not sufficient. See WP:DONATEIMAGE for more information. Regards, decltype (talk) 09:04, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Philippe Bober.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wcam (talk) 19:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coproduction Office (October 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 22:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Rupnik17, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 22:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coproduction Office has been accepted

[edit]
Coproduction Office, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Primefac (talk) 16:25, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Michelangelo Frammartino) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Michelangelo Frammartino, Rupnik17!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for one issue.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 21:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Philippe Bober

[edit]

Hello, Rupnik17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philippe Bober".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:37, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Philippe Bober

[edit]

Hello, Rupnik17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philippe Bober".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 15:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rupnik17. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. kingboyk (talk) 15:57, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Philippe Bober

[edit]

Hello, Rupnik17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Philippe Bober".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 11:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Il Dono moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Il Dono, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheChronium 16:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Il buco

[edit]

Hi. Please don't copy and paste text from other websites as you did on this article, per WP:COPYVIO. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Il Dono

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Rupnik17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Il Dono, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Il Dono

[edit]

Hello, Rupnik17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Il Dono".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:18, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]