Jump to content

User talk:Rushilsharmichael

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Nik Shahr, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 06:06, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm DreamRimmer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Nikhil Sharma—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:23, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was citing the sources. Nikhil Shah (Sharma) is me, its an Indian name. That was a photo of a white guy. Rushilsharmichael (talk) 14:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nikhil Sharma, you may be blocked from editing. – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalizing. Good thing these logs show as proof so we can see who is behind these messages. It's pointless to drag this issue out please. Please respect me as I respect you. Rushilsharmichael (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikhil Shah (December 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rushilsharmichael! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
there should be no reasonable basis for this deletion. i'm going to revert your deletion and challenge you to prove or refute any information I've provided for Nikhil Shah as not true. it's none of your business if the information is 100% factual and true and of good sources. if it isn't, i'll show you numerous sources throughout wikipedia of the same exact thing. Rushilsharmichael (talk) 19:16, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nikhil Shah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nik Shah, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Squeakachu (talk) 20:03, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop. Please read WP:Notability, WP:Reliable sources, and WP:Autobiography before continuing to edit. Your blogs are not sufficient sources for an article. If you persist you're going to end up being blocked. Squeakachu (talk) 20:12, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia is not for telling the world about oneself

[edit]

You are, of course, very welcome to start making contributions to the encyclopaedia, in line with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, on subjects other than yourself, in a neutral way, if you are interested in doing so. However, if you wish to publicise yourself, then there are many web sites which provide that sort of service, but Wikipedia is not one of them. In addition, while you may have come to Wikipedia sincerely believing that posting self-promotional material would be acceptable, it is difficult to believe that you honestly thought that it would be all right to do so by hijacking existing articles and replacing their content with material about yourself. If you continue in the same way, you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 15:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]